The evaluation of recovery rate associated with the use of thermal desorption systems for the analysis of atmospheric reduced sulfur compounds (RSC) using the GC/PFPD method

被引:30
作者
Kim, KH [1 ]
Ju, DW
Joo, SW
机构
[1] Sejong Univ, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Atmospher Environm Lab, Seoul, South Korea
[2] ITC21, Songnam, South Korea
[3] Soongsil Univ, Dept Chem, CAMDRC, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
GC/PFPD; reduced sulfur compound (RSC); hydrogen sulfide; recovery rate; peltier; thermal desorption;
D O I
10.1016/j.talanta.2005.04.048
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In this work, the recovery rate (RR) of preconcentration technique was examined using a combination of the Peltier cooling (PC) and thermal desorption (TD) system for the gas chromatographic (GC) analysis of reduced sulfur compounds (RSC) in air. The possible loss or gain of analytes resulting from the use of the PC/TD system was estimated by analyzing equimolar standards (10 ppm) of four S compounds including H2S, CH3SH, DMS, and DMDS in two different manners: (1) by injecting directly the four S compounds into the GC via injector and (2) by introducing them through the PC/TD system. When a series of tests were conducted on different types of gas media (ultrapure air versus N-2) and across varying relative humidity (RH), it was found that the RR values for the four S compounds vary from 80 to 110% range. The overall results of our study thus indicate that the RR for the PC/TD system is fairly good and that subtle differences in their RR values may reflect the combined effects of different factors investigated in this study such as types of gas media, RH change, and properties of target analytes (e.g., recovery rate of the least (H2S) versus the highest compound (DMDS)). (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:955 / 959
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   EMISSIONS AND CONCENTRATIONS OF HYDROGEN-SULFIDE IN THE AIR OF THE TROPICAL FOREST OF THE IVORY-COAST AND OF TEMPERATE REGIONS IN FRANCE [J].
DELMAS, R ;
BAUDET, J ;
SERVANT, J ;
BAZIARD, Y .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1980, 85 (NC8) :4468-4474
[2]   COMPARISON OF COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE ATOMIC EMISSION AND CHEMILUMINESCENCE DETECTORS FOR SULFUR-SELECTIVE GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHIC DETECTION [J].
ECKERTTILOTTA, SE ;
HAWTHORNE, SB ;
MILLER, DJ .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1992, 591 (1-2) :313-323
[3]  
Firor R.L., 2001, COMP SULFUR SELECTIV
[4]  
HOFFMANN U, 1992, ATMOS ENVIRON, V26, P2445
[5]   AN AUTOMATED INSTRUMENT FOR THE ANALYSIS OF ATMOSPHERIC DIMETHYL SULFIDE AND CARBON-DISULFIDE [J].
IVEY, JP ;
SWAN, HB .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1995, 306 (2-3) :259-266
[6]   Controlling variables for the uptake of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide by soil [J].
Kesselmeier, J ;
Teusch, N ;
Kuhn, U .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D9) :11577-11584
[7]   Performance characterization of the GC/PFPD for H2S, CH3SH, DMS, and DMDS in air [J].
Kim, KH .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 39 (12) :2235-2242
[8]   Characterization of malodorous sulfur compounds in landfill gas [J].
Kim, KH ;
Choi, YJ ;
Jeon, EC ;
Sunwoo, Y .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 39 (06) :1103-1112
[9]  
KIM KH, UNPUB ANAL CHEM
[10]   QUANTITATION OF THE LOSSES OF GASEOUS SULFUR-COMPOUNDS TO ENCLOSURE WALLS [J].
KUSTER, WC ;
GOLDAN, PD .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1987, 21 (08) :810-815