Treatment of aniline contaminated water by a self-designed dielectric barrier discharge reactor coupling with micro-bubbles: optimization of the system and effects of water matrix

被引:24
作者
Liu, Yanan [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Xue [1 ]
Sun, Jihui [1 ]
Li, Pan [3 ]
Zhang, Ai [1 ]
机构
[1] Donghua Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, 2999 North Renmin Rd, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Inst Pollut Control & Ecol Secur, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, State Key Lab Control & Resource Reuse, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
dielectric barrier discharge (DBD); micro-bubbles technology (MB); aniline; water matrix; active species; PULSED CORONA DISCHARGE; WASTE-WATER; AQUEOUS-SOLUTION; DEGRADATION; OXIDATION; REMOVAL; SOIL; REMEDIATION; MINERALIZATION; PH;
D O I
10.1002/jctb.5796
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND A self-designed dielectric barrier discharge reactor coupling with micro-bubbles (DBD/MB) system is proposed as a promising method to remove aniline in waste water. The optimum geometric dimensions of the reactor and the operating parameters of the DBD/MB system as well as the influence of the water matrix (including cations, anions, and coexisting organics) were investigated. The functional mechanisms of the DBD/MB system were explored. RESULTS By setting the double-dielectric barrier discharge reactor (DDBD) with electrode gap as 5 mm, discharge voltage as 50 kV, and air intake flow of the MB generator as 40 mL min(-1), the aniline removal efficiency reached 82% within an hour. The removal efficiency could be promoted by the presence of metal ions (Cu2+, Fe2+ and Mn2+), while it was also found that with the presence of certain anions (CO32-, Cl-, NO3- and SO42-), the degradation process was inhibited by more than 40%. The coexisting organics did not influence aniline removal. Active species (center dot OH, H2O2 and O-3) generated in the DDBD/MB treatment and micro-bubbles played important roles in the aniline degradation process. CONCLUSIONS This study provides fundamental information for the application of a DDBD/MB system to effectively remove aniline from water. (c) 2018 Society of Chemical Industry
引用
收藏
页码:494 / 504
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Comparative study on 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 2,4-dichlorophenol removal from aqueous solutions via ozonation, photocatalysis and non-thermal plasma using a planar falling film reactor [J].
Aziz, Kosar Hikmat Hama ;
Miessner, Hans ;
Mueller, Siegfried ;
Mahyar, Ali ;
Kalass, Dieter ;
Moeller, Detlev ;
Khorshid, Ibrahim ;
Rashid, Muhammad Amin M. .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2018, 343 :107-115
[2]   Mineralization of aniline in aqueous solution by electro-activated persulfate oxidation enhanced with ultrasound [J].
Chen, Wen-Shing ;
Huang, Chi-Pin .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2015, 266 :279-288
[3]  
ELIASSON B, 1987, HELV PHYS ACTA, V60, P241
[4]   Corona above water reactor for systematic study of aqueous phenol degradation [J].
Grabowski, LR ;
van Veldhuizen, EM ;
Pemen, AJM ;
Rutgers, WR .
PLASMA CHEMISTRY AND PLASMA PROCESSING, 2006, 26 (01) :3-17
[5]   Low frequency US and UV-A assisted Fenton oxidation of simulated dyehouse wastewater [J].
Grcic, Ivana ;
Maljkovic, Marija ;
Papic, Sanja ;
Koprivanac, Natalija .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2011, 197 :272-284
[6]  
HUIE RE, 1991, RADIAT PHYS CHEM, V38, P477
[7]   Review on electrical discharge plasma technology for wastewater remediation [J].
Jiang, Bo ;
Zheng, Jingtang ;
Qiu, Shi ;
Wu, Mingbo ;
Zhang, Qinhui ;
Yan, Zifeng ;
Xue, Qingzhong .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2014, 236 :348-368
[8]   Effect of pH on the ultrasonic degradation of ionic aromatic compounds in aqueous solution [J].
Jiang, Y ;
Pétrier, C ;
Waite, TD .
ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 9 (03) :163-168
[9]  
Jing Z, 2015, J CHEM, V2015, P905
[10]   Catalytic ozonation of dye in a microbubble system: Hydroxyl radical contribution and effect of salt [J].
Khuntia, Snigdha ;
Majumder, Subrata K. ;
Ghosh, Pallab .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 4 (02) :2250-2258