Extracorporeal and intracorporeal approaches of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in children: is one superior to another?

被引:4
作者
Hsu, Yao-Jen [1 ]
Chang, Paul Chia-Yu [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Chin-Hung [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Fu-Yu [3 ]
Duh, Yih-Cherng [4 ]
机构
[1] Mackay Mem Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Pediat Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Mackay Med Coll, New Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Changhua Christian Hosp, Dept Pediat Surg, Changhua, Taiwan
[4] Mackay Mem Hosp, Dept Pediat Surg, Hsinchu, Taiwan
关键词
Laparoscopic appendectomy; Single incision; Children; Extracorporeal; Intracorporeal; Complicated appendicitis; ASSISTED APPENDECTOMY; PORT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.03.049
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery has been widely popularized for pediatric appendicitis. Various techniques have been proposed with two main approaches: extracorporeal and intracorporeal. The purpose of this study is to compare the result of different approaches in single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) in children. Material and methods: With IRB approval, patients less than 18 years of age who underwent SILA were enrolled from July 2012 to December 2015. The patients were divided into three groups based on surgical approach: extracorporeal (Extra), mixed (Mix), and intracorporeal (Intra) approaches. Parameters were retrospectively reviewed, including age, gender, white blood cell (WBC), operation time, operative findings, time to diet, length of hospital stay (LOS), and complications. Statistical analysis was performed separately for simple and complicated appendicitis. Results: There were 32, 32, and 24 patients with simple appendicitis in Extra, Mix, and Intra respectively. There were 27, 15, and 31 patients with complicated appendicitis in the three groups, respectively. No significant difference was noted in the mean age, gender distribution, or WBCs between the different groups. A higher percentage of patients with complicated appendicitis received intracorporeal approach than those with simple appendicitis (42.5% vs. 27.3%, p= 0.044). In simple appendicitis, the LOS was significantly longer in Extra as compared to Mix (p= 0.043). Otherwise, the mean LOS, time to diet, and complications were not significantly different. The mean operation time was similar between groups of simple appendicitis (56.5 +/- 19.5, 63.6 +/- 23.5, and 70.1 +/- 23.1 min, p= 0.08), whereas it was significantly shorter in Extra of complicated appendicitis (67.6 +/- 16.4, 86.6 +/- 19.0, and 89.9 +/- 23.4 min, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that intracorporeal approach is an independent factor for prolonged operation time in both simple and complicated appendicitis. Conclusions: Different approaches of SILA in children have similar outcomes for both simple and complicated appendicitis. Extracorporeal is the most time efficient; however, intracorporeal can be helpful to deal with complex situations. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1764 / 1768
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Comparison of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy versus single incision laparoscopic appendectomy in children: which is the better surgical option?
    Boo, Yoon Jung
    Lee, Yoon
    Lee, Ji Sung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2016, 51 (08) : 1288 - 1291
  • [2] Single-incision laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in children: exteriorization of the appendix is a key component of a simple and cost-effective surgical technique
    Deie, Kyoichi
    Uchida, Hiroo
    Kawashima, Hiroshi
    Tanaka, Yujiro
    Masuko, Takayuki
    Takazawa, Shinya
    [J]. PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 29 (11) : 1187 - 1191
  • [3] One-trocar appendectomy in pediatric surgery
    Esposito, C
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1998, 12 (02): : 177 - 178
  • [4] Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy (TUSPLA): Scarless Intracorporeal Appendectomy
    Hong, Tae Ho
    Kim, Hyung Lan
    Lee, Yoon Suk
    Kim, Jin Jo
    Lee, Keun Ho
    You, Young Kyoung
    Oh, Se Jeong
    Park, Seung Man
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 19 (01): : 75 - 78
  • [5] Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy is associated with lower costs compared to multiport laparoscopic appendectomy
    Kulaylat, Afif N.
    Podany, Abigail B.
    Hollenbeak, Christopher S.
    Santos, Mary C.
    Rocourt, Dorothy V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2014, 49 (10) : 1508 - 1512
  • [6] Single port laparoscopic appendectomy in children using glove port and conventional rigid instruments
    Lee, Seung Eun
    Choi, Yoo Shin
    Kim, Beom Gyu
    Cha, Seong-Jae
    Park, Joong-Min
    Chang, In Taik
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2014, 86 (01) : 35 - 38
  • [7] Appendectomy using single-incision pediatric endosurgery for acute and perforated appendicitis
    Muensterer, Oliver J.
    Nougues, Cecilia Puga
    Adibe, Obinna O.
    Amin, Sejal R.
    Georgeson, Keith E.
    Harmon, Carroll M.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (12): : 3201 - 3204
  • [8] Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted appendectomy in children: the results of a single-port, single-channel procedure
    Ohno, Yasuharu
    Morimura, Toshiya
    Hayashi, Shin-ichi
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (02): : 523 - 527
  • [9] PELOSI MA, 1992, J REPROD MED, V37, P588
  • [10] Early Experience with Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery in Children
    Ponsky, Todd A.
    Diluciano, Jennifer
    Chwals, Walter
    Parry, Robert
    Boulanger, Scott
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 19 (04): : 551 - 553