The impact of Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) Phases on Project Performance: A Case of Large-scale Residential Construction Project

被引:59
作者
Kabirifar, Kamyar [1 ]
Mojtahedi, Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Fac Built Environm, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
EPC projects; project Performance; triple constraints; TOPSIS; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS; MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE; DECISION-MAKING; DELAY CAUSES; SUSTAINABILITY; DESIGN; COST; TIME; INTEGRATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.3390/buildings9010015
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The Construction Industry is a complex and fragmented industry worldwide with regards to its supply chain, products, and processes, and is faced with a similar dilemma as faced by manufacturers during its time in past decades. Scope, time, and cost are the triple constraints of project management and leading factors in defining the project performance. Productivity and efficiency of each construction project is measured through its triple constraints, therefore the factors that affect project success are significantly important. Despite the importance of understanding project performance indicators, few empirical studies have been conducted over the last decade in terms of analyzing the factors that determine the performance of high-rise buildings in Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) projects. Hence, the aim of this paper is to analyze and rank EPC critical activities across large-scale residential construction projects in Iran, by using the TOPSIS method as a multi-attribute group decision-making technique. Results indicate that engineering design, project planning and controls are significant factors contributing to the project performance. In addition, engineering has a pivotal role in project performance and this significance is followed by the construction phase. On the contrary, all believe procurement is more important than Construction phase.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   Environmental Parametric Cost Model in Oil and Gas EPC Contracts [J].
Abbaspour, Madjid ;
Toutounchian, Sanaz ;
Dana, Tooraj ;
Abedi, Zahra ;
Toutounchian, Solmaz .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (01)
[2]  
Abolhasani A, 2012, ASSESSMENT SUCCESS F
[3]  
Ahmad Zaini A., 2010, P INT C CONSTR PROJ
[4]   Design for Deconstruction (DfD): Critical success factors for diverting end-of-life waste from landfills [J].
Akinade, Olugbenga O. ;
Oyedele, Lukumon O. ;
Ajayi, Saheed O. ;
Bilal, Muhammad ;
Alaka, Hafiz A. ;
Owolabi, Hakeem A. ;
Bello, Sururah A. ;
Jaiyeoba, Babatunde E. ;
Kadiri, Kabir O. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 60 :3-13
[5]  
Albliwi SA, 2017, INT J QUAL RELIAB MA, V34, P508, DOI 10.1108/IJQRM-09-2015-0138
[6]   Assessing Understanding of Planning and Scheduling Theory and Practice on Construction Projects [J].
AlNasseri, Hammad ;
Aulin, Radhlinah .
ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 27 (02) :58-72
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CONSTRUCTION CORRUPT, DOI DOI 10.1596/1813-9450-4271
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2017, PROJECT MANAGEMENT S
[9]   Effect of organizational culture on delay in construction [J].
Arditi, David ;
Nayak, Shruti ;
Damci, Atilla .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2017, 35 (02) :136-147
[10]   Exploring delay causes of road construction projects in Egypt [J].
Aziz, Remon F. ;
Abdel-Hakam, Asmaa A. .
ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2016, 55 (02) :1515-1539