Intrathecal drug delivery for treatment of chronic low back pain: Report from the National Outcomes Registry for Low Back Pain

被引:84
作者
Deer, T
Chapple, I
Classen, A
Javery, K
Stoker, V
Tonder, L
Burchiel, K
机构
[1] Ctr Pain Relief, Charleston, WV 25301 USA
[2] Carolina Pain Specialists, W Columbia, SC USA
[3] Trinity Pain Med Associates, Osteopath Med Ctr, Ft Worth, TX USA
[4] Metropolitan Hosp, Michigan Pain Consultants, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[5] Medtron Neurol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[6] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Neurol Surg, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
outcomes; registry; low back pain; intrathecal drug delivery;
D O I
10.1111/j.1526-4637.2004.04011.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective. To obtain data on patient demographics, clinical practices, and long-term outcomes for patients with chronic low back pain treated with implantable drug-delivery systems. Design. The National Outcomes Registry for Low Back Pain collected data at baseline, trialing, implant (or decision not to implant), and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Data were collected at all time points, regardless of implant status. Outcome Measaures. Numeric pain ratings and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability scores from implanted patients were compared among baseline and 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Patients were also asked to rate their quality of life and satisfaction with the therapy. Results. Thirty-six physicians enrolled 166 patients to be trialed for drug-delivery systems. The trialing success rate was 93% (154 patients). In all, 136 patients (82%) were implanted. In the implant group, numeric pain ratings dropped by more than 47% for back pain and more than 31% for leg pain at the 12-month follow-up. More than 65% of implanted patients reduced their Oswestry scores by at least one level at their 12-month follow-ups compared with baseline. At 12-month follow-ups, 80% of implanted patients were satisfied with their therapy and 87% said they would undergo the procedure again. Conclusions. Current clinical practices related to trialing of drug-delivery systems resulted in the majority of patients successfully trialed. At 12-month follow-ups, implanted patients experienced reductions in numeric back and leg pain ratings, improved Oswestry scores, and high satisfaction with the therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 13
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   A prospective study of long-term intrathecal morphine in the management of chronic nonmalignant pain [J].
Anderson, VC ;
Burchiel, KJ .
NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 44 (02) :289-300
[2]  
ANDERSON VC, 2003, IN PRESS NEUROMODULA
[3]   Cost-effectiveness analysis of spinal cord stimulation in treatment of failed back surgery syndrome [J].
Bell, GK ;
Kidd, D ;
North, RB .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1997, 13 (05) :286-295
[4]   Analysis of the French health ministry's national register of incidents involving medical devices in anaesthesia and intensive care [J].
Beydon, L ;
Conreux, F ;
Le Gall, R ;
Safran, D ;
Cazalaa, JB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 86 (03) :382-387
[5]  
Bigos S., 1994, Clinical practice guideline
[6]   Disease-specific and generic health outcomes: A model for the evaluation of long-term intrathecal opioid therapy in noncancer low back pain patients [J].
Brown, J ;
Klapow, J ;
Doleys, D ;
Lowery, D ;
Tutak, U .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1999, 15 (02) :122-131
[7]   Prospective, multicenter study of spinal cord stimulation for relief of chronic back and extremity pain [J].
Burchiel, KJ ;
Anderson, VC ;
Brown, FD ;
Fessler, RG ;
Friedman, WA ;
Pelofsky, S ;
Weiner, RL ;
Oakley, J ;
Shatin, D .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (23) :2786-2794
[8]  
COOMBS DW, 1983, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V250, P2336
[9]  
Fairbank J C, 1980, Physiotherapy, V66, P271
[10]   A prospective study of catheter-related complications of intrathecal drug delivery systems [J].
Follett, KA ;
Naumann, CP .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2000, 19 (03) :209-215