Transperitoneal left laparoscopic pyeloplasty with transmesocolic access to the pelvi-ureteric junction: technique description and results with a minimum follow-up of 1 year

被引:17
作者
Porpiglia, Francesco [1 ]
Billia, Michele [1 ]
Volpe, Alessandro [1 ]
Morra, Ivano [1 ]
Scarpa, Roberto M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, San Luigi Hosp, Dept Urol, I-10143 Turin, Italy
关键词
transmesenteric; pyeloplasty; laparoscopy; kidney;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07323.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To describe and evaluate the safety and outcome of transperitoneal left laparoscopic pyeloplasty (TLLP) with a direct approach to the pelvi-ureteric junction (PUJ) through the mesentero-colic space, which avoids mobilization of the descending colon. From March 2005 to June 2006, 18 consecutive patients underwent TLLP with direct access. For each patient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), hospital stay, skin-to-skin operative time, time from incision of the posterior peritoneum to dissection of the PUJ, blood loss, time to resumption of oral intake and complications were recorded. Statistical analysis was used to assess whether the body habitus (BMI < 25 kg/m(2) or > 25 kg/m(2)) affected the outcomes. There were no complications during or after surgery and no conversions to open surgery were needed. The mean (SD) time to resumption of oral intake was 1.36 (0.5) days. The mean hospital stay was 3.3 (0.67) days and the mean follow-up was 17.4 (4.7) months. There was no statistical difference between patients with BMI higher or lower than 25 kg/m(2) (P = 0.42). The success rate at 1 year after surgery was 100%. TLLP with direct access to the PUJ through the mesentero-colic space is a safe and effective technique. This approach should be considered for all patients with left primary PUJ obstruction who are eligible for a LP and especially for slim patients or patients with a large renal pelvis.
引用
收藏
页码:1024 / 1028
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Transmesocolic approach: Faster and safe for laparoscopic surgery on the left side [J].
Andreoni, C ;
Gattas, N ;
Araujo, M ;
Ortiz, V ;
Srougi, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04) :318-318
[2]   Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO):: Solving the technical difficulties [J].
Bachmann, A ;
Ruszat, R ;
Forster, T ;
Eberli, D ;
Zimmermann, M ;
Müller, A ;
Gasser, TC ;
Sulser, T ;
Wyler, S .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (02) :264-272
[3]   Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Assessment of objective and subjective outcome [J].
Bauer, JJ ;
Bishoff, JT ;
Moore, RG ;
Chen, RN ;
Iverson, AJ ;
Kavoussi, LR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (03) :692-695
[4]   Transmesocolic pyeloplasty: Experience of a single center [J].
Castillo, Octavio A. ;
Vitagliano, Gonzalo ;
Alvarez, Juan Manuel ;
Pinto, Ivan ;
Toblli, Jorge .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 (04) :415-418
[5]  
Cisek LJ, 2004, J ENDOUROL S, V18, pA219
[6]   Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction [J].
Davenport, K ;
Minervini, A ;
Timoney, AG ;
Keeley, FX .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 48 (06) :973-977
[7]   Retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy using the holmium:YAG laser [J].
Giddens, JL ;
Grasso, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (05) :1509-1512
[8]   Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The first 100 cases [J].
Jarrett, TW ;
Chan, DY ;
Charambura, TC ;
Fugita, O ;
Kavoussi, LR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (03) :1253-1256
[9]   Laparoscopic reconstructive urology [J].
Kaouk, JH ;
Gill, IS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (04) :1070-1078
[10]   Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction [J].
Klingler, HC ;
Remzi, M ;
Janetschek, G ;
Kratzik, C ;
Marberger, MJ .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 44 (03) :340-345