Techno-economic evaluation of methanol production via gasification of vacuum residue and conventional reforming routes

被引:11
|
作者
Al-Rowaili, Fayez Nasir [1 ,2 ]
Khalafalla, Siddig S. [1 ]
Al-Yami, Dhaffer S. [2 ]
Jamal, Aqil [2 ]
Ahmed, Usama [1 ,3 ]
Zahid, Umer [1 ,4 ]
Al-Mutairi, Eid M. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Chem Engn Dept, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[2] Saudi Aramco, Res & Dev Ctr, Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Hydrogen & Energy Stora, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Membranes & Water Secur, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[5] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Refining & Adv Chem, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Methanol; Carbon capture and utilization; Vacuum residue gasification; Economic analysis; Process simulation; NATURAL-GAS; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; FUEL-OIL; SIMULATION; CO2; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cherd.2021.11.004
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The continuous rise of global carbon emissions demands the utilization of fossil fuels in a cleaner and sustainable way. Gasification is a potential technology that can convert the dirty fossil fuels for the production of clean and environment friendly fuels in an economical manner. In this study, vacuum residue is employed as a feedstock to produce high grade methanol. A vacuum residue to methanol (VRTM) process is simulated using Aspen Plus for a methanol production capacity of 90 t/h with 99.9 wt.% purity. The developed VRTM process is bench-marked with the conventional steam reforming to methanol (SRTM) process through energy, environmental and economic analysis. The performance of vacuum residue gasifier, natural gas reformer and the methanol synthesis reactor are validated against the plant data and the simulation results are found to be in good agreement. The results showed that the VRTM process offers a process energy efficiency of 49.5% which is 1.6% higher than the SRTM process. The unit cost of methanol product from the VRTM process is $ 317/tCH(3)OH which is 14% lower compared to the SRTM process. In terms of environmental analysis, SRTM process emits less carbon emissions than the VRTM process. However, the VRTM process offers a high purity captured CO2 stream that can be utilized for another application that can further offset the methanol production cost. (C) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 375
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Techno-economic evaluation of a combined biomass gasification-solid oxide fuel cell system for ethanol production via syngas fermentation
    Ma, Shuai
    Dong, Changqing
    Hu, Xiaoying
    Xue, Junjie
    Zhao, Ying
    Wang, Xiaoqiang
    FUEL, 2022, 324
  • [22] Techno-economic and environmental assessment of CO2 conversion to methanol: Direct versus indirect conversion routes
    Haghighatjoo, Fatemeh
    Rahimpour, Mohammad Reza
    Farsi, Mohammad
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2023, 184
  • [23] Techno-economic optimization of shale gas to dimethyl ether production processes via direct and indirect synthesis routes
    Mevawala, Chirag
    Jiang, Yuan
    Bhattacharyya, Debangsu
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 238 : 119 - 134
  • [24] Techno-economic evaluation of methanol production using by-product gases from iron and steel works
    Gao, Ruxing
    Zhang, Chundong
    Kwak, Geunjae
    Lee, Yun-Jo
    Kang, Seok Chang
    Guan, Guofeng
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 213 (213)
  • [25] Comparative techno-economic analysis of biohydrogen production via bio-oil gasification and bio-oil reforming
    Zhang, Yanan
    Brown, Tristan R.
    Hu, Guiping
    Brown, Robert C.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2013, 51 : 99 - 108
  • [26] Techno-economic evaluation of a mechanical pulp mill with gasification
    He, Jie
    Engstrand, Per
    Bjorkqvist, Olof
    Zhang, Wennan
    NORDIC PULP & PAPER RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2013, 28 (03) : 349 - 357
  • [27] A techno-economic evaluation of the energy generation by proton exchange membrane fuel cell using biogas reforming
    Cozendey da Silva, Hector Napolea
    Prata, Diego Martinez
    Alves Lima, Gilson Brito
    Zotes, Luis Perez
    Mattos, Lisiane Veiga
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 200 : 598 - 608
  • [28] Techno-economic analysis of hydrogen production from dehydrogenation and steam reforming of ethanol for carbon dioxide conversion to methanol
    Khamhaeng, P.
    Laosiripojana, N.
    Assabumrungrat, S.
    Kim-Lohsoontorn, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (60) : 30891 - 30902
  • [29] Techno-economic evaluation of the integrated polygeneration system of methanol, power and heat production from coke oven gas
    Kim, Sunghoon
    Kim, Minsoo
    Kim, Yong Tae
    Kwak, Geunjae
    Kim, Jiyong
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 182 : 240 - 250
  • [30] Techno-economic analysis of methanol and electricity poly-generation system based on coal partial gasification
    Ye, Chao
    Wang, Qinhui
    Zheng, Youqu
    Li, Guoneng
    Zhang, Zhiguo
    Luo, Zhongyang
    ENERGY, 2019, 185 : 624 - 632