Techno-economic evaluation of methanol production via gasification of vacuum residue and conventional reforming routes

被引:11
|
作者
Al-Rowaili, Fayez Nasir [1 ,2 ]
Khalafalla, Siddig S. [1 ]
Al-Yami, Dhaffer S. [2 ]
Jamal, Aqil [2 ]
Ahmed, Usama [1 ,3 ]
Zahid, Umer [1 ,4 ]
Al-Mutairi, Eid M. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Chem Engn Dept, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[2] Saudi Aramco, Res & Dev Ctr, Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Hydrogen & Energy Stora, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Membranes & Water Secur, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[5] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Refining & Adv Chem, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Methanol; Carbon capture and utilization; Vacuum residue gasification; Economic analysis; Process simulation; NATURAL-GAS; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; FUEL-OIL; SIMULATION; CO2; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cherd.2021.11.004
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The continuous rise of global carbon emissions demands the utilization of fossil fuels in a cleaner and sustainable way. Gasification is a potential technology that can convert the dirty fossil fuels for the production of clean and environment friendly fuels in an economical manner. In this study, vacuum residue is employed as a feedstock to produce high grade methanol. A vacuum residue to methanol (VRTM) process is simulated using Aspen Plus for a methanol production capacity of 90 t/h with 99.9 wt.% purity. The developed VRTM process is bench-marked with the conventional steam reforming to methanol (SRTM) process through energy, environmental and economic analysis. The performance of vacuum residue gasifier, natural gas reformer and the methanol synthesis reactor are validated against the plant data and the simulation results are found to be in good agreement. The results showed that the VRTM process offers a process energy efficiency of 49.5% which is 1.6% higher than the SRTM process. The unit cost of methanol product from the VRTM process is $ 317/tCH(3)OH which is 14% lower compared to the SRTM process. In terms of environmental analysis, SRTM process emits less carbon emissions than the VRTM process. However, the VRTM process offers a high purity captured CO2 stream that can be utilized for another application that can further offset the methanol production cost. (C) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 375
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Methanol production via integrated methane reforming and chemical looping combustion: Process simulation and techno-economic assessment
    Labbaf, Babak
    Tabatabaei, Mojgan
    Mostafavi, Ehsan
    Tijani, Mansour
    Mahinpey, Nader
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2021, 148 : 1346 - 1356
  • [12] Techno-economic modeling of an integrated biomethane-biomethanol production process via biomass gasification, electrolysis, biomethanation, and catalytic methanol synthesis
    Menin, Lorenzo
    Benedetti, Vittoria
    Patuzzi, Francesco
    Baratieri, Marco
    BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2023, 13 (02) : 977 - 998
  • [13] Techno-Economic and Carbon Footprint Analyses of a Coke Oven Gas Reuse Process for Methanol Production
    Portha, Jean-Francois
    Uribe-Soto, Wilmar
    Commenge, Jean-Marc
    Valentin, Solene
    Falk, Laurent
    PROCESSES, 2021, 9 (06)
  • [14] A techno-economic analysis (TEA) of a combined process of torrefaction and gasification of lignocellulose biomass (bagasse) for methanol and electricity production
    Fajimi, L., I
    Chrisostomou, J.
    Oboirien, B. O.
    BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2024, 14 (11) : 12501 - 12516
  • [15] Steam reforming of methanol for ultra-pure H2 production in a membrane reactor: Techno-economic analysis
    Kim, Sehwa
    Yun, Su-Won
    Lee, Boreum
    Heo, Juheon
    Kim, Kihyung
    Kim, Yong-Tae
    Lim, Hankwon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (04) : 2330 - 2339
  • [16] Methanol fuel production from solar-assisted supercritical water gasification of algae: a techno-economic annual optimisation
    Rahbari, Alireza
    Shirazi, Alec
    Pye, John
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & FUELS, 2021, 5 (19) : 4913 - 4931
  • [17] Thermodynamic and Techno-Economic Performance Comparison of Methanol Aqueous Phase Reforming and Steam Reforming for Hydrogen Production
    Hu, Changsong
    Xu, Chao
    Xi, Xiaojun
    He, Yao
    Wang, Tiejun
    ENERGIES, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [18] Methanol production via pressurized entrained flow biomass gasification - Techno-economic comparison of integrated vs. stand-alone production
    Andersson, Jim
    Lundgren, Joakim
    Marklund, Magnus
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2014, 64 : 256 - 268
  • [19] Techno-economic and environmental assessment of methanol steam reforming for H2 production at various scales
    Byun, Manhee
    Lee, Boreum
    Lee, Hyunjun
    Jung, Seungkyo
    Ji, Hyunjin
    Lim, Hankwon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (46) : 24146 - 24158
  • [20] Piggery waste to sustainable fuels via indirect supercritical water gasification and membrane reforming at 600 °C: a techno-economic assessment
    Bardwell, Louise
    Rahbari, Alireza
    Wang, Ye
    Amidy, Martin
    Pye, John
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & FUELS, 2024, 8 (13): : 2869 - 2879