Techno-economic evaluation of methanol production via gasification of vacuum residue and conventional reforming routes

被引:13
作者
Al-Rowaili, Fayez Nasir [1 ,2 ]
Khalafalla, Siddig S. [1 ]
Al-Yami, Dhaffer S. [2 ]
Jamal, Aqil [2 ]
Ahmed, Usama [1 ,3 ]
Zahid, Umer [1 ,4 ]
Al-Mutairi, Eid M. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Chem Engn Dept, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[2] Saudi Aramco, Res & Dev Ctr, Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Hydrogen & Energy Stora, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Membranes & Water Secur, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[5] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Refining & Adv Chem, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Methanol; Carbon capture and utilization; Vacuum residue gasification; Economic analysis; Process simulation; NATURAL-GAS; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; FUEL-OIL; SIMULATION; CO2; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cherd.2021.11.004
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The continuous rise of global carbon emissions demands the utilization of fossil fuels in a cleaner and sustainable way. Gasification is a potential technology that can convert the dirty fossil fuels for the production of clean and environment friendly fuels in an economical manner. In this study, vacuum residue is employed as a feedstock to produce high grade methanol. A vacuum residue to methanol (VRTM) process is simulated using Aspen Plus for a methanol production capacity of 90 t/h with 99.9 wt.% purity. The developed VRTM process is bench-marked with the conventional steam reforming to methanol (SRTM) process through energy, environmental and economic analysis. The performance of vacuum residue gasifier, natural gas reformer and the methanol synthesis reactor are validated against the plant data and the simulation results are found to be in good agreement. The results showed that the VRTM process offers a process energy efficiency of 49.5% which is 1.6% higher than the SRTM process. The unit cost of methanol product from the VRTM process is $ 317/tCH(3)OH which is 14% lower compared to the SRTM process. In terms of environmental analysis, SRTM process emits less carbon emissions than the VRTM process. However, the VRTM process offers a high purity captured CO2 stream that can be utilized for another application that can further offset the methanol production cost. (C) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 375
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[21]   An evaluation of the cost-competitiveness of maritime fuels - a comparison of heavy fuel oil and methanol (renewable and natural gas) in Iceland [J].
Helgason, Rafn ;
Cook, David ;
Davidsdottir, Brynhildur .
SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2020, 23 :236-248
[22]  
Inkwood Research, 2019, GLOBAL METHANOL MARKET FORECAST 2019-2027
[23]   Investigation and optimization of a new hybrid natural gas reforming system for cascaded hydrogen, ammonia and methanol synthesis [J].
Ishaq, H. ;
Dincer, I. .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 148
[24]   Simultaneous methanol production and separation in the methanol synthesis reactor to increase methanol production [J].
Keshavarz, A. ;
Mirvakili, A. ;
Chahibakhsh, S. ;
Shariati, A. ;
Rahimpour, M. R. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2020, 158
[25]   Conceptual Design Development of Coal-to-Methanol Process with Carbon Capture and Utilization [J].
Khalafalla, Siddig S. ;
Zahid, Umer ;
Jameel, Abdul Gani Abdul ;
Ahmed, Usama ;
Alenazey, Feraih S. ;
Lee, Chul-Jin .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (23)
[26]   Novel efficient process for methanol synthesis by CO2 hydrogenation [J].
Kiss, Anton A. ;
Pragt, J. J. ;
Vos, H. J. ;
Bargeman, G. ;
de Groot, M. T. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2016, 284 :260-269
[27]   Nanocrystalline zirconia as catalyst support in methanol synthesis [J].
Liu, XM ;
Lu, GQ ;
Yan, ZF .
APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL, 2005, 279 (1-2) :241-245
[28]   4-E analysis of heavy oil-based IGCC [J].
Markadeh, Rasoul Shahsavan ;
Arabkhalaj, Arash ;
Ghassemi, Hojat ;
Ahmadi, Pouria .
ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2020, 42 (07) :849-863
[29]   Syngas production from gasification of high sulfur fuel oil using a CO2 sorbent [J].
Miri, M. ;
Shahraki, S. ;
Motahari-Nezhad, M. .
PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 37 (17) :1931-1937
[30]   Exergoeconomic comparison of syngas production from biomass, coal, and natural gas for dimethyl ether synthesis in single-step and two-step processes [J].
Nakyai, Teeranun ;
Saebea, Dang .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 241