The joint impact of entrepreneurial orientation and market orientation in new product development: Studying firm and environmental contingencies

被引:76
作者
Morgan, Todd [1 ]
Anokhin, Sergey Alexander [2 ]
机构
[1] Haworth Coll Business, Dept Management, 600 Mar Ave, Kalamazoo, MI 49006 USA
[2] St Cloud State Univ, Herberger Business Sch, Dept Management & Entrepreneurship, 720 4th Ave S, St Cloud, MN 56301 USA
关键词
Entrepreneurial orientation; Market orientation; NPD performance; Environmental turbulence; Firm size; Services; Strategic orientation; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; CORPORATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP; PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP; STRATEGIC ORIENTATIONS; BUSINESS PERFORMANCE; VALUE APPROPRIATION; MODERATING ROLE; VALUE CREATION; INNOVATION; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.019
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Previous research has suggested important environmental and firm factors may be involved in the individual and joint implementation of entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and market orientation (MO). In a sample of 179 SMEs, we examine firm-level and environmental-level contingencies regarding EO and MO's joint impact on new product development performance. This study provides further context to which firms should avoid or pursue an EO-MO dual implementation. Contrary to our arguments, the results show that larger firms may be more adept at managing EO and MO simultaneously, whereas inefficiencies may arise with smaller firms. In support of our arguments, we empirically show that firms that focus on services rather than goods benefit from the joint impact of EO and MO. Additionally, environmental turbulence and industries characterized by high technological intensity provide benefits for EO-MO implementation due to opportunities in volatile environments aligning with EO and hedging risk by staying close to customers.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 138
页数:10
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Ahire SL, 1996, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V34, P1
[2]  
Alqahtani N., 2017, P GLOBAL RES S MARKE, P36
[3]   Technological arbitrage opportunities and interindustry differences in entry rates [J].
Anokhin, Sergey ;
Wincent, Joakim .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2014, 29 (03) :437-452
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, REGIONAL FRONTIERS E
[5]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[6]  
Attuahene-Gima K, 2001, ORGAN SCI, V12, P54
[7]   Does market orientation facilitate balanced innovation programs? An organizational learning perspective [J].
Baker, William E. ;
Sinkula, James M. .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2007, 24 (04) :316-334
[8]   The Complementary Effects of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Profitability in Small Businesses* [J].
Baker, William E. ;
Sinkula, James M. .
JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2009, 47 (04) :443-464
[9]   Benefiting from economic crisis? Strategic orientation effects, trade-offs, and configurations with resource availability on SME performance [J].
Beliaeva, Tatiana ;
Shirokova, Galina ;
Wales, William ;
Gafforova, Elena .
INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2020, 16 (01) :165-194
[10]   To serve or create? Strategic orientations toward customers and innovation [J].
Berthon, P ;
Hulbert, JM ;
Pitt, LF .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1999, 42 (01) :37-+