Adhesive capsulitis: Contrast-enhanced shoulder MRI findings

被引:31
作者
Gokalp, Gokhan [1 ]
Algin, Oktay [2 ]
Yildirim, Nalan [1 ]
Yazici, Zeynep [1 ]
机构
[1] Uludag Univ Med Fac, Dept Radiol, Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
[2] Ataturk Training & Res Hosp, Dept Radiol, Bilkent, Turkey
关键词
adhesive capsulitis; contrast enhancement; magnetic resonance imaging; FROZEN SHOULDER; ARTHROGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; TEARS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02215.x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Evaluation of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) findings in cases clinically diagnosed as adhesive capsulitis (AC). Methods: CE-MRI images of 12 cases diagnosed as AC (13 shoulder joints) and nine control cases were retrospectively evaluated. AC diagnosis was established based on the history and clinical symptoms. MR signal intensity changes in the axillary pouch, rotator interval, biceps anchor and anterior-posterior capsules were analysed with regard to the presence of abnormal soft tissue and contrast enhancement. Capsular and synovial thickening were measured in the axillary recess and rotator interval on coronal oblique CE T1-weighted images. Patient and control groups were compared by Fisher's exact and McNemar tests in terms of signal intensity changes and contrast enhancement in the described areas. Results: Comparison of the group with AC and the control group regarding intensity changes showed a statistically significant difference in the axillary pouch (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the rotator interval, biceps anchor and anterior-posterior capsules (P > 0.05). Comparison of AC and control groups in terms of contrast enhancement revealed statistically significant differences in the axillary pouch, rotator interval, biceps anchor and anterior-posterior capsules (P < 0.001). A significant difference was determined between the AC and control groups with regard to thickening in axillary pouch and rotator interval (P < 0.001). Conclusion: CE studies are useful for diagnosis of AC as it demonstrates thickening of specific soft-tissue areas like joint capsule and synovium.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 125
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Idiopathic adhesive capsulitis Of the shoulder: a review [J].
Brue, S. ;
Valentin, A. ;
Forssblad, M. ;
Werner, S. ;
Mikkelsen, C. ;
Cerulli, G. .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2007, 15 (08) :1048-1054
[2]   THE PATHOLOGY OF FROZEN SHOULDER - A DUPUYTREN-LIKE DISEASE [J].
BUNKER, TD ;
ANTHONY, PP .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1995, 77 (05) :677-683
[3]  
Carrillon Y, 1999, REV RHUM, V66, P201
[4]   Adhesive capsulitis: role of MR imaging in differential diagnosis [J].
Connell, D ;
Padmanabhan, R ;
Buchbinder, R .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (08) :2100-+
[5]  
EKELUND AL, 1992, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P105
[6]   ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS OF THE SHOULDER - MR DIAGNOSIS [J].
EMIG, EW ;
SCHWEITZER, ME ;
KARASICK, D ;
LUBOWITZ, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 164 (06) :1457-1459
[7]   Indirect MR arthrography of the shoulder: Use of abduction and external rotation to detect full- and partial-thickness tears of the supraspinatus tendon [J].
Herold, T ;
Bachthaler, M ;
Hamer, OW ;
Hente, R ;
Feuerbach, S ;
Fellner, C ;
Strotzer, M ;
Lenhart, M ;
Paetzel, C .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 240 (01) :152-160
[8]   Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: evaluation with MR arthrography [J].
Jung, JY ;
Jee, WH ;
Chun, HJ ;
Kim, YS ;
Chung, YG ;
Kim, JM .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (04) :791-796
[9]   Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder - Diagnosis using magnetic resonance arthrography, with arthroscopic findings as the standard [J].
Lee, MH ;
Ahn, JM ;
Muhle, C ;
Kim, SH ;
Park, JS ;
Kim, SH ;
Kim, SM ;
Kang, HS .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2003, 27 (06) :901-906
[10]   Magnetic resonance imaging of shoulders with idiopathic adhesive capsulitis:: reliability of measures [J].
Lefevre-Colau, MM ;
Drapé, JL ;
Fayad, F ;
Rannou, F ;
Diche, T ;
Minvielle, F ;
Demaille-Wlodyka, S ;
Mayoux-Benhamou, MA ;
Fermanian, J ;
Poiraudeau, S ;
Revel, M .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2005, 15 (12) :2415-2422