Similar proportions of women lose bone mineral density with raloxifene or alendronate treatment

被引:5
作者
Adachi, JD
Adami, S
Kulkarni, PM
Wong, M
Stock, JL
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, St Josephs Hosp, Hamilton, ON L8N 1Y2, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Verona, I-37100 Verona, Italy
[4] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Res Labs, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
关键词
least significant change; raloxifene; alendronate; bone mineral density;
D O I
10.1385/JCD:8:3:273
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The ISCD recommends that bone mineral density (BMD) be monitored in patients undergoing antiresorptive therapy to identify patients with a significant BMD loss. This analysis compares the proportions of postmenopausal women treated with raloxifene 60 mg/d (n = 82) or alendronate 10 mg/d (n = 83) who had significant BMD loss in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that assessed changes in lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD from baseline to 1 yr, measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. According to ISCD criteria, significant BMD loss was defined as greater than the least significant change, calculated as precision multiplied by 2.77 (95% confidence interval). Assuming a 1% precision at the lumbar spine, the proportions of women with a loss of BMD greater than the least significant change (3%) were similar (p > 0.05) between the raloxifene (3%) and alendronate (2%) groups. Assuming 2% precision at the femoral neck, the proportions of women with a loss greater than the least significant change (6%) were similar (p > 0.05) between the raloxifene (1%) and alendronate (2%) groups. In conclusion, similar proportions of women did not respond to raloxifene or alendronate therapy, as by changes in lumbar spine or femoral neck BNID, when precision error was taken into account.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 277
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Current controversies in bone densitometry [J].
Bonnick, SL .
CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2002, 14 (04) :416-420
[2]   Importance of precision in bone density measurements [J].
Bonnick, SL ;
Johnston, CC ;
Kleerekoper, M ;
Lindsay, R ;
Miller, P ;
Sherwood, L ;
Siris, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2001, 4 (02) :105-110
[3]   Risk of fracture among women who lose bone density during treatment with alendronate. The Fracture Intervention Trial [J].
Chapurlat, RD ;
Palermo, L ;
Ramsay, P ;
Cummings, SR .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 16 (07) :842-848
[4]   Clinical use of bone densitometry - Scientific review [J].
Cummings, SR ;
Bates, D ;
Black, DM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (15) :1889-1897
[5]   Improvement in spine bone density and reduction in risk of vertebral fractures during treatment with antiresorptive drugs [J].
Cummings, SR ;
Karpf, DB ;
Harris, F ;
Genant, HK ;
Ensrud, K ;
LaCroix, AZ ;
Black, DM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 112 (04) :281-289
[6]   Relationship between changes in bone mineral density and fracture risk reduction with antiresorptive drugs: Some issues with meta-analyses [J].
Delmas, PD ;
Li, ZQ ;
Cooper, C .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2004, 19 (02) :330-337
[7]   Is the paradigm shifting? [J].
Heaney, RP .
BONE, 2003, 33 (04) :457-465
[8]  
Hochberg MC, 1999, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V42, P1246, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(199906)42:6<1246::AID-ANR22>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-U
[10]   Changes in bone density and turnover explain the reductions in incidence of nonvertebral fractures that occur during treatment with antiresorptive agents [J].
Hochberg, MC ;
Greenspan, S ;
Wasnich, RD ;
Miller, P ;
Thompson, DE ;
Ross, PD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2002, 87 (04) :1586-1592