Patients' Willingness to Provide Their Clinical Data for Research Purposes and Acceptance of Different Consent Models: Findings From a Representative Survey of Patients With Cancer

被引:21
作者
Koengeter, Anja [1 ]
Schickhardt, Christoph [2 ]
Jungkunz, Martin [2 ]
Bergbold, Susanne [3 ]
Mehlis, Katja [1 ]
Winkler, Eva C. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Natl Ctr Tumor Dis, Dept Med Oncol, Sect Translat Med Eth, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] German Canc Res Ctr, Natl Ctr Tumor Dis, Sect Translat Med Eth, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] German Canc Res Ctr, Epidemiol Canc Registry Baden Wurttemberg, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Natl Ctr Tumor Dis, Dept Med Oncol, Sect Translat Med Eth, Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
secondary use; consent; data sharing; data access; research benefit and control of data; health data; clinical data; private sector; international data sharing; patient perspective; GENOMIC DATA; HEALTH-CARE; DONATE; VIEWS;
D O I
10.2196/37665
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Secondary use of clinical data for biomedical research purposes holds great potential for various types of noninterventional, data-driven studies. Patients' willingness to support research with their clinical data is a crucial prerequisite for research progress. Objective: The aim of the study was to learn about patients' attitudes and expectations regarding secondary use of their clinical data. In a next step, our results can inform the development of an appropriate governance framework for secondary use of clinical data for research purposes. Methods: A questionnaire was developed to assess the willingness of patients with cancer to provide their clinical data for biomedical research purposes, considering different conditions of data sharing and consent models. The Cancer Registry of the German federal state of Baden-Wurttemberg recruited a proportionally stratified random sample of patients with cancer and survivors of cancer based on a full census. Results: In total, 838 participants completed the survey. Approximately all participants (810/838, 96.7%) showed general willingness to make clinical data available for biomedical research purposes; however, they expected certain requirements to be met, such as comparable data protection standards for data use abroad and the possibility to renew consent at regular time intervals. Most participants (620/838, 73.9%) supported data use also by researchers in commercial companies. More than half of the participants (503/838, 60%) were willing to give up control over clinical data in favor of research benefits. Most participants expressed acceptance of the broad consent model (494/838, 58.9%), followed by data use by default (with the option to opt out at any time; 419/838, 50%); specific consent for every study showed the lowest acceptance rate (327/838, 39%). Patients expected physicians to share their data (763/838, 91.1%) and their fellow patients to support secondary use with their clinical data (679/838, 81%). Conclusions: Although patients' general willingness to make their clinical data available for biomedical research purposes is very high, the willingness of a substantial proportion of patients depends on additional requirements. Taking these perspectives into account is essential for designing trustworthy governance of clinical data reuse and sharing. The willingness to accept the loss of control over clinical data to enhance the benefits of research should be given special consideration.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Putting the Focus Back on the Patient: How Privacy Concerns Affect Personal Health Information Sharing Intentions [J].
Abdelhamid, Mohamed ;
Gaia, Joana ;
Sanders, G. Lawrence .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (09)
[2]   Who benefits and how? Public expectations of public benefits from data-intensive health research [J].
Aitken, Mhairi ;
Porteous, Carol ;
Creamer, Emily ;
Cunningham-Burley, Sarah .
BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 2018, 5 (02)
[3]   Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies [J].
Aitken, Mhairi ;
Jorre, Jenna de St. ;
Pagliari, Claudia ;
Jepson, Ruth ;
Cunningham-Burley, Sarah .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2016, 17 :1-24
[4]  
[Anonymous], DATA4LIFE
[5]   FALSE HOPES AND BEST DATA - CONSENT TO RESEARCH AND THE THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION [J].
APPELBAUM, PS ;
ROTH, LH ;
LIDZ, CW ;
BENSON, P ;
WINSLADE, W .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1987, 17 (02) :20-24
[6]  
Bildungsstand, STAT
[7]   Sharing Government Health Data With the Private Sector: Community Attitudes Survey [J].
Braunack-Mayer, Annette ;
Fabrianesi, Belinda ;
Street, Jackie ;
O'Shaughnessy, Pauline ;
Carter, Stacy M. ;
Engelen, Lina ;
Carolan, Lucy ;
Bosward, Rebecca ;
Roder, David ;
Sproston, Kylie .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (10)
[8]   Meta-consent for the secondary use of health data within a learning health system: a qualitative study of the public's perspective [J].
Cumyn, Annabelle ;
Barton, Adrien ;
Dault, Roxanne ;
Safa, Nissrine ;
Cloutier, Anne-Marie ;
Ethier, Jean-Francois .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2021, 22 (01)
[9]   Patient/family views on data sharing in rare diseases: study in the European LeukoTreat project [J].
Darquy, Sylviane ;
Moutel, Gregoire ;
Lapointe, Anne-Sophie ;
D'Audiffret, Diane ;
Champagnat, Julie ;
Guerroui, Samia ;
Vendeville, Marie-Louise ;
Boespflug-Tanguy, Odile ;
Duchange, Nathalie .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2016, 24 (03) :338-343
[10]  
EDPB, 2021, April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons With Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation)