Bibliometric and Content Analyses of Articles Related to Science Education for Special Education Students

被引:1
作者
Tosun, Cemal [1 ]
机构
[1] Bartin Univ, Fac Educ, Dept Sci Educ, Bartin, Turkey
关键词
Bibliometric analysis; content analysis; science education; specific education; LEARNING-DISABILITIES; INSTRUCTION; TEACHERS; ADOLESCENTS;
D O I
10.1080/1034912X.2021.2016659
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to reveal trends of articles related to science education for special education students published in the SSI journals. For bibliometric analysis, 'Education & Educational Research' and 'Education Specific' categories and SSCI journals were selected in WoS database and a total of 193 articles were accessed. In addition, content analysis of 100 articles was performed in the present study. The results of the bibliometric analysis showed that the most used keywords were science education, science, instruction, universal design for learning, special education, science instruction, learning disabilities, high school, students with disabilities, reading, dyslexia and inclusive education. The most productive authors were M.A. Mastropieri and T.E. Scruggs. The most cited journals was Remedial and Special Education, On the other hand, the most preferred research methods in the content analysis articles were experimental and literature review. Many of the articles focused on students with learning disabilities and various disabilities. The most preferred sample groups in these articles were middle school students and teachers. The sample size was between 31 and 100 for content analysis articles. In addition, analysis results showed that the sample size of general education students was higher than that of special education students.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 369
页数:18
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, MAINSTREAMING PRACTI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, 11 DEV PLAN 2019 202, P140
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, NAT SCI ED STAND
[4]   TEACHERS PERCEPTIONS OF MAINSTREAMING IN AN INQUIRY ORIENTED ELEMENTARY SCIENCE PROGRAM [J].
ATWOOD, RK ;
OLDHAM, BR .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 1985, 69 (05) :619-624
[5]   SCIENCE INSTRUCTION FOR THE MILDLY HANDICAPPED - DIRECT INSTRUCTION VERSUS DISCOVERY TEACHING [J].
BAY, M ;
STAVER, JR ;
BRYAN, T ;
HALE, JB .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 1992, 29 (06) :555-570
[6]   An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field [J].
Cobo, M. J. ;
Lopez-Herrera, A. G. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. ;
Herrera, F. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2011, 5 (01) :146-166
[7]   A bibliometric and descriptive analysis of inclusive education in science education [J].
Comaru, Michele Waltz ;
Lopes, Renato Matos ;
Braga, Luiza Amara Maciel ;
Batista Mota, Fabio ;
Galvao, Cecilia .
STUDIES IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2021, 57 (02) :241-264
[8]  
Demirdag S., 2014, International Journal of Teaching and Education, V2, P168
[9]   A Meta-Analytic Review of Graphic Organizers and Science Instruction for Adolescents with Learning Disabilities: Implications for the Intermediate and Secondary Science Classroom [J].
Dexter, Douglas D. ;
Park, Youn J. ;
Hughes, Charles A. .
LEARNING DISABILITIES RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2011, 26 (04) :204-213
[10]  
Education Reform Initiative, 2011, KAYN BUT YOL EG DUN