Uncrowded Hypervolume-Based Multiobjective Optimization with Gene-Pool Optimal Mixing

被引:2
作者
Maree, S. C. [1 ,2 ]
Alderliesten, T. [3 ]
Bosman, P. A. N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Ctr Wiskunde & Informat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
Multiobjective optimization; black-box optimization; hypervolume indicator; ALGORITHM; SELECTION; INDICATORS; ADAPTATION; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1162/evco_a_00303
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Domination-based multiobjective (MO) evolutionary algorithms (EAs) are today arguably the most frequently used type of MOEA. These methods, however, stagnate when the majority of the population becomes nondominated, preventing further convergence to the Pareto set. Hypervolume-based MO optimization has shown promising results to overcome this. Direct use of the hypervolume, however, results in no selection pressure for dominated solutions. The recently introduced Sofomore framework overcomes this by solving multiple interleaved single-objective dynamic problems that iteratively improve a single approximation set, based on the uncrowded hypervolume improvement (UHVI). It thereby however loses many advantages of population-based MO optimization, such as handling multimodality. Here, we reformulate the UHVI as a quality measure for approximation sets, called the uncrowded hypervolume (UHV), which can be used to directly solve MO optimization problems with a single-objective optimizer. We use the state-of-the-art gene-pool optimal mixing evolutionary algorithm (GOMEA) that is capable of efficiently exploiting the intrinsically available grey-box properties of this problem. The resulting algorithm, UHV-GOMEA, is compared with Sofomore equipped with GOMEA, and the domination-based MO-GOMEA. In doing so, we investigate in which scenarios either domination-based or hypervolume-based methods are preferred. Finally, we construct a simple hybrid approach that combines MO-GOMEA with UHV-GOMEA and outperforms both.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 353
页数:25
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1998, Technical Report IMM-REP-1998-7
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, EVOALGOS 11 PYTHON P
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, Ph.D. thesis
  • [4] Auger A, 2009, FOGA'09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH ACM SIGRVO CONFERENCE ON FOUNDATIONS OF GENETIC ALGORITHMS, P87
  • [5] HypE: An Algorithm for Fast Hypervolume-Based Many-Objective Optimization
    Bader, Johannes
    Zitzler, Eckart
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2011, 19 (01) : 45 - 76
  • [6] jMetalPy: A Python']Python framework for multi-objective optimization with metaheuristics
    Benitez-Hidalgo, Antonio
    Nebro, Antonio J.
    Garcia-Nieto, Jose
    Oregi, Izaskun
    Del Ser, Javier
    [J]. SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2019, 51
  • [7] Convergence of set-based multi-objective optimization, indicators and deteriorative cycles
    Berghammer, Rudolf
    Friedrich, Tobias
    Neumann, Frank
    [J]. THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2012, 456 : 2 - 17
  • [8] SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume
    Beume, Nicola
    Naujoks, Boris
    Emmerich, Michael
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 181 (03) : 1653 - 1669
  • [9] On the Complexity of Computing the Hypervolume Indicator
    Beume, Nicola
    Fonseca, Carlos M.
    Lopez-Ibanez, Manuel
    Paquete, Luis
    Vahrenhold, Jan
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2009, 13 (05) : 1075 - 1082
  • [10] The balance between proximity and diversity in multiobjective evolutionary algorithms
    Bosman, PAN
    Thierens, D
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2003, 7 (02) : 174 - 188