The effects of age, viewing distance, display type, font type, colour contrast and number of syllables on the legibility of Korean characters

被引:22
作者
Kong, Yong-Ku [2 ]
Lee, Inseok [3 ]
Jung, Myung-Chul [4 ]
Song, Young-Woong [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Daegu, Dept Occupat Hlth, Gyongsan 712702, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Syst Management Engn, Suwon 440746, South Korea
[3] Hankyong Natl Univ, Dept Safety Engn, Ansung 456749, South Korea
[4] Ajou Univ, Dept Ind & Informat Syst Engn, Suwon 443749, South Korea
关键词
age; display type; font type; Korean character; Number of syllables; viewing distance; VISUAL PERFORMANCE; AMBIENT ILLUMINATION; PAPER; FATIGUE; SIZE; TEXT; LUMINANCE; VDT;
D O I
10.1080/00140139.2011.568635
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This study evaluated the effects of age (20s and 60s), viewing distance (50 cm, 200 cm), display type (paper, monitor), font type (Gothic, Ming), colour contrast (black letters on white background, white letters on black background) and number of syllables (one, two) on the legibility of Korean characters by using the four legibility measures (minimum letter size for 100% correctness, maximum letter size for 0% correctness, minimum letter size for the least discomfort and maximum letter size for the most discomfort). Ten subjects in each age group read the four letters presented on a slide (letter size varied from 80 pt to 2 pt). Subjects also subjectively rated the reading discomfort of the letters on a 4-point scale (1 = no discomfort, 4 = most discomfort). According to the ANOVA procedure, age, viewing distance and font type significantly affected the four dependent variables (p < 0.05), while the main effect of colour contrast was not statistically significant for any measures. Two-syllable letters had smaller letters than one-syllable letters in the two correctness measures. The younger group could see letter sizes two times smaller than the old group could and the viewing distance of 50 cm showed letters about three times smaller than those at a 200 cm viewing distance. The Gothic fonts were smaller than the Ming fonts. Monitors were smaller than paper for correctness and maximum letter size for the most discomfort. From a comparison of the results for correctness and discomfort, people generally preferred larger letter sizes to those that they could read. The findings of this study may provide basic information for setting a global standard of letter size or font type to improve the legibility of characters written in Korean.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 465
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, 1001988 ANSI HFS, V6, P17
[2]   Reading words, seeing style: The neuropsychology of word, font and handwriting perception [J].
Barton, Jason J. S. ;
Sekunova, Alla ;
Sheldon, Claire ;
Johnston, Samantha ;
Iaria, Giuseppe ;
Scheel, Michael .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2010, 48 (13) :3866-3877
[3]  
Bernard M., 2001, CHI 01 EXTENDED ABST, P175, DOI [DOI 10.1145/634067.634173, 10.1145/634067.634173]
[4]   Comparing the effects of text size and format on the readibility of computer-displayed Times New Roman and Arial text [J].
Bernard, ML ;
Chaparro, BS ;
Mills, MM ;
Halcomb, CG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2003, 59 (06) :823-835
[5]  
BRAUN CC, 1992, PROCEEDINGS OF THE HUMAN FACTORS SOCIETY, 36TH ANNUAL MEETING, VOLS 1 AND 2, P926
[6]   Age, luminance, and print legibility in homes, offices, and public places [J].
Charness, N ;
Dijkstra, K .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1999, 41 (02) :173-193
[7]   READING FROM MICROFICHE, A VDT, AND THE PRINTED PAGE - SUBJECTIVE FATIGUE AND PERFORMANCE [J].
CUSHMAN, WH .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1986, 28 (01) :63-73
[8]  
Darroch I, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3585, P253, DOI 10.1007/11555261_23
[9]   READING FROM PAPER VERSUS SCREENS - A CRITICAL-REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE [J].
DILLON, A .
ERGONOMICS, 1992, 35 (10) :1297-1326
[10]   AGING AND HUMAN CONE PHOTOPIGMENTS [J].
ELSNER, AE ;
BERK, L ;
BURNS, SA ;
ROSENBERG, PR .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1988, 5 (12) :2106-2112