Lung isolation in the morbidly obese patient: a comparison of a left-sided double-lumen tracheal tube with the Arndt wire-guided blocker

被引:31
作者
Campos, J. H. [1 ]
Hallam, E. A. [1 ]
Ueda, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa Healthcare, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
anatomy; airway; equipment; tubes double-lumen; tubes endobronchial; obesity; thoracic anaes; TORQUE CONTROL BLOCKER; ENDOTRACHEAL-TUBE; THORACIC-SURGERY; ANESTHESIA; INTUBATION; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aes206
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Obese patients are at risk of complications during airway management including difficult tracheal intubation. There are no reports regarding the ease of intubation or efficiency of lung collapse with the use of lung isolation devices for the morbidly obese patient. We conducted a prospective, randomized study in morbidly obese patients undergoing one-lung ventilation. We compared the effectiveness and ease of placement of a left-sided double-lumen tube and the Arndt blocker. Fifty adult patients undergoing thoracic surgery were randomly assigned to a double-lumen tracheal tube (DLT) or standard single-lumen tracheal tube and an Arndt blocker. The primary endpoint was to record the number of times the tube/devices were successfully positioned at the first attempt and the time spent to achieve optimal position as verified by fibreoptic bronchoscopy. A secondary outcome was the adequacy of lung collapse. For the left-sided DLT group, there were three intubation failures on the first attempt. This group required an alternative method with an airway exchange catheter technique to advance the DLT. In the single-lumen tracheal tube with an Arndt blocker group, there were two intubation failures on the first attempt. After lung isolation devices were placed, lung collapse was clinically comparable in both groups. There is no overall advantage of one device over the other during intubation of the morbidly obese patient.
引用
收藏
页码:630 / 635
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Obesity in anaesthesia and intensive care [J].
Adams, JP ;
Murphy, PG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 85 (01) :91-108
[2]  
Brodsky J B, 2009, Br J Anaesth, V103 Suppl 1, pi66, DOI 10.1093/bja/aep262
[3]   Morbid obesity and tracheal intubation [J].
Brodsky, JB ;
Lemmens, HJM ;
Brock-Utne, JG ;
Vierra, M ;
Saidman, LJ .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 94 (03) :732-736
[4]   Which device should be considered the best for lung isolation: double-lumen endotracheal tube versus bronchial blockers [J].
Campos, Javier H. .
CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2007, 20 (01) :27-31
[5]  
Campos Javier H, 2005, Thorac Surg Clin, V15, P71
[6]   The incidence of right upper-lobe collapse when comparing a right-sided double-lumen tube versus a modified left double-lumen tube for left-sided thoracic surgery [J].
Campos, JH ;
Massa, FC ;
Kernstine, KH .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (03) :535-540
[7]   Devices for lung isolation used by anesthesiologists with limited thoracic experience -: Comparison of double-lumen endotracheal tube, Univent® torque control blocker, and Arndt wire-guided endobronchial Blocker® [J].
Campos, JH ;
Hallam, EA ;
Van Natta, T ;
Kernstine, KH .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 104 (02) :261-266
[8]   A comparison of a left-sided Broncho-Cath® with the torque control blocker univent and the wire-guided blocker [J].
Campos, JH ;
Kernstine, KH .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 96 (01) :283-289
[9]   Is there a better right-sided tube for one-lung ventilation? A comparison of the right-sided double-lumen tube with the single-lumen tube with right-sided enclosed bronchial blocker [J].
Campos, JH ;
Massa, FC .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (04) :696-700
[10]  
Candiotti K, 2009, Br J Anaesth, V103 Suppl 1, pi23, DOI 10.1093/bja/aep294