Prognostic factors in lymph node metastases of prostatic cancer patients: the size of the metastases but not extranodal extension independently predicts survival

被引:41
作者
Fleischmann, A. [1 ]
Schobinger, S.
Markwalder, R.
Schumacher, M. [2 ]
Burkhard, F. [2 ]
Thalmann, G. N. [2 ]
Studer, U. E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Inst Pathol, Dept Pathol, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Dept Urol, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
extranodal extension; metastasis; prognosis; prostatectomy; prostatic cancer;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.03129.x
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Aims: To analyse tumour characteristics and the prognostic significance of prostatic cancers with extranodal extension of lymph node metastases (ENE) in 102 node-positive, hormone treatment-naive patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended lymphadenectomy. Methods and results: The median number of nodes examined per patient was 21 (range 9-68), and the median follow-up time was 92 months (range 12-191). ENE was observed in 71 patients (70%). They had significantly more, larger and less differentiated nodal metastases, paralleled by significantly larger primary tumours at more advanced stages and with higher Gleason scores than patients without ENE. ENE defined a subgroup with significantly decreased biochemical recurrence-free (P = 0.038) and overall survival (P = 0.037). In multivariate analyses the diameter of the largest metastasis and Gleason score of the primary tumour were independent predictors of survival. Conclusions: ENE in prostatic cancer is an indicator lesion for advanced/aggressive tumours with poor outcome. However, the strong correlation with larger metastases suggests that ENE may result from their size, which was the only independent risk factor in the metastasizing component. Consequently, histopathological reports should specify the true indicator of poor survival in the lymphadenectomy specimens, which is the size of the largest metastasis in each patient.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 475
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: Impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Allaf, ME ;
Palapattu, GS ;
Trock, BJ ;
Carter, HB ;
Walsh, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (05) :1840-1844
[2]   Extracapsular spread in the clinically negative neck (NO): Implications and outcome [J].
Alvi, A ;
Johnson, JT .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1996, 114 (01) :65-70
[3]   Prognostic factors and survival in node-positive (N1) prostate cancer -: A prospective study based on data from a Swedish population-based cohort [J].
Aus, G ;
Nordenskjöld, K ;
Robinson, D ;
Rosell, J ;
Varenhorst, E .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 43 (06) :627-631
[4]   Is a limited lymph node dissection an adequate staging procedure for prostate cancer? [J].
Bader, P ;
Burkhard, FC ;
Markwalder, R ;
Studer, UE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (02) :514-518
[5]   Disease progression and survival of patients with positive lymph nodes after radical prostatectomy. Is there a chance of cure? [J].
Bader, P ;
Burkhard, FC ;
Markwalder, R ;
Studer, UE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (03) :849-854
[6]   Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era [J].
Boorjian, Stephen A. ;
Thompson, R. Houston ;
Siddiqui, Sameer ;
Bagniewski, Stephanie ;
Bergstralh, Erik J. ;
Karnes, R. Jeffrey ;
Frank, Igor ;
Blute, Michael L. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (03) :864-870
[7]   The role of lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer [J].
Burkhard, FC ;
Studer, UE .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2004, 22 (03) :198-202
[8]   Cancer volume of lymph node metastasis predicts progression in prostate cancer [J].
Cheng, L ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Cheville, JC ;
Slezak, J ;
Corica, FA ;
Zincke, H ;
Blute, ML ;
Bostwick, DG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1998, 22 (12) :1491-1500
[9]   Extranodal extension in lymph node-positive prostate cancer [J].
Cheng, L ;
Pisansky, TM ;
Ramnani, DM ;
Leibovich, BC ;
Cheville, JC ;
Slezak, E ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Zincke, H ;
Bostwick, DG .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2000, 13 (02) :113-118
[10]  
Cheng L, 2001, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V91, P66, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010101)91:1<66::AID-CNCR9>3.0.CO