A comparison of pretreatment methods for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic materials

被引:134
作者
Conde-Mejia, Carolina [1 ]
Jimenez-Gutierrez, Arturo [1 ]
El-Halwagi, Mahmoud [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Tecnol Celaya, Dept Ingn Quim, Celaya 38010, Gto, Mexico
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Chem Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Bioethanol; Biorefineries; Pretreatment; Energy; Fermentation yields; CARBON-DIOXIDE EXPLOSION; SUGAR-CANE BAGASSE; LIME PRETREATMENT; ENZYMATIC-HYDROLYSIS; CORN STOVER; FERMENTATION INHIBITORS; CELLULOSE HYDROLYSIS; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; ACID-HYDROLYSIS; WHEAT-STRAW;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2011.08.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Lignocellulosic materials, which consist mainly of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, are among the most promising renewable feedstocks for the production of energy and chemicals. Bioethanol is a major biofuel that can be produced from lignocellulosic materials. Its production typically involves a hydrolysis-fermentation route, which has three main steps: pretreatment to get fermentable sugars, fermentation to produce bioethanol, and a separation process to obtain highly concentrated bioethanol. The pretreatment step has been recognized as a technological bottleneck for the cost-effective development of bioprocesses from lignocellulosic materials. In this work we analyze the potential of several pretreatment methods for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic materials. Simulations based on stoichiometric relations and yield data were conducted to evaluate the energy requirements of each pretreatment method. Other parameters were also considered such as the cost of chemicals, consumption of water, and constraints on the composition of inhibitors. Performance benchmarks were identifies using targeting techniques and these benchmarks were used to assess the actual performance of the alternatives. The combination of the evaluated parameters with target production values obtained from reported yields served as the basis for identifying the most promising pretreatment options and for defining areas of opportunities. This approach uses limited information, but it provides reliable results in order to reduce the number of pretreatment alternatives. The target production usage gives an estimation of the global process efficiency without the completed flowsheet defined. (C) 2011 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 202
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
[11]   Sugarcane bagasse hemicellulose hydrolysate for ethanol production by acid recovery process [J].
Cheng, Ke-Ke ;
Cai, Bai-Yan ;
Zhang, Jian-An ;
Ling, Hong-Zhi ;
Zhou, Yu-He ;
Ge, Jing-Ping ;
Xu, Jing-Ming .
BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2008, 38 (01) :105-109
[12]  
de Avila Rodrigues F., 2008, CHEM ENG TECHNOL, V31, P883
[13]   An Economic Comparison of Different Fermentation Configurations to Convert Corn Stover to Ethanol Using Z. mobilis and Saccharomyces [J].
Dutta, Abhijit ;
Dowe, Nancy ;
Ibsen, Kelly N. ;
Schell, Daniel J. ;
Aden, Andy .
BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS, 2010, 26 (01) :64-72
[14]   Process and economic analysis of pretreatment technologies [J].
Eggeman, T ;
Elander, RT .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 96 (18) :2019-2025
[15]   Pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials for efficient bioethanol production [J].
Galbe, Mats ;
Zacchi, Guido .
BIOFUELS, 2007, 108 :41-65
[16]   Hydrothermal processing of lignocellulosic materials [J].
Garrote, G ;
Domínguez, H ;
Parajó, JC .
HOLZ ALS ROH-UND WERKSTOFF, 1999, 57 (03) :191-202
[17]  
Hu G, 2008, BIORESOURCES, V3, P270
[18]  
Icis, 2011, TRUST MARK INT GLOB
[19]   Lime pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover [J].
Kim, S ;
Holtzapple, MT .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 96 (18) :1994-2006
[20]   Methods for Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Efficient Hydrolysis and Biofuel Production [J].
Kumar, Parveen ;
Barrett, Diane M. ;
Delwiche, Michael J. ;
Stroeve, Pieter .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2009, 48 (08) :3713-3729