Evidence-Based Clinical Psychological Assessment (EBCPA): Review of Current State of the Literature and Best Practices

被引:15
作者
Wright, A. Jordan [1 ]
Pade, Hadas [2 ]
Gottfried, Emily D. [3 ]
Arbisi, Paul A. [4 ,5 ]
McCord, David M. [6 ]
Wygant, Dustin B. [7 ]
机构
[1] New York Univ, Dept Appl Psychol, 246 Greene St,8th Floor, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Alliant Int Univ, Calif Sch Profess Psychol, Dept Psychol, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Community & Publ Safety Psychiat Div, Charleston, SC USA
[4] Minneapolis Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Dept Psychiat & Psychol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[6] Western Carolina Univ, Dept Psychol, Cullowhee, NC 28723 USA
[7] Eastern Kentucky Univ, Dept Psychol, Richmond, KY 40475 USA
关键词
psychological assessment; evidence-based practice; cultural competence; assessment feedback; TREATMENT UTILITY; THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTION; MULTIPLE INFORMANTS; TEST-PERFORMANCE; NATIONAL-SURVEY; SCORING ERRORS; VALIDITY; MODEL; JUDGMENT; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1037/pro0000447
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Public Significance Statement Clinical psychological assessment affects people in many, extremely significant, and lasting ways. This paper aims to help psychologists ensure that they are following the best practices supported by the literature. Although it constitutes a primary function of psychologists, distinguishing the field from all others, and serves as a core competency in graduate training, there is not a great deal of literature (and certainly not consensus) on what constitutes evidence-based practice in clinical psychological assessment. The goal of this paper is to review the available literature (and clinical wisdom) related to the practice of evidence-based clinical psychological assessment (EBCPA), aimed at improving outcomes in clinical settings. Within the framework of how EBCPA aspires to be and can be useful in clinical practice, this paper discusses specific components that contribute to best possible practices. Concrete recommendations are made, as well as calls for further research in specific areas to build a more solid empirical foundation for EBCPA.
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 386
页数:15
相关论文
共 152 条
[1]   Interaction of therapeutic process and alliance during psychological assessment [J].
Ackerman, SJ ;
Hilsenroth, MJ ;
Baity, MR ;
Blagys, MD .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2000, 75 (01) :82-109
[2]   The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project:: Fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction [J].
AEgisdottir, S ;
White, MJ ;
Spengler, PM ;
Maugherman, AS ;
Anderson, LA ;
Cook, RS ;
Nichols, CN ;
Lampropoulos, GK ;
Walker, BS ;
Cohen, G ;
Rush, JD .
COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGIST, 2006, 34 (03) :341-382
[3]  
Alfonso V.C., 1997, Contemporary intellectual assessment theories, tests, and issues, P326, DOI DOI 10.1080/02783190802201986
[4]  
Allen A., 2003, J MENTAL HEALTH COUN, V25, P165, DOI [10.17744/mehc.25.3.lw7h84q861dw6ytj, DOI 10.17744/MEHC.25.3.LW7H84Q861DW6YTJ]
[5]   Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology [J].
不详 .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2013, 68 (01) :7-19
[6]  
American Educational Research Association American Psychological Association National Council on Measurement in Education, 2014, STAND ED PSYCH TESTS
[7]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DSM 5, DOI [10.1007/springerreference_179660, DOI 10.1007/SPRINGERREFERENCE_179660]
[8]  
American Psychological Association, 2020, APA GUID PSYCH ASS E
[9]  
American Psychological Association, 2020, APA GUID ED TRAIN PS
[10]  
American Psychological Association Commission on Accreditation, 2017, IMPL REG PROF WID CO