Environmental and economic benefits of electric, hybrid and conventional vehicle treatment: A case study of Lithuania

被引:8
作者
Petrauskiene, Kamile [1 ]
Tverskyte, Rasa [1 ]
Dvarioniene, Jolanta [1 ]
机构
[1] Kaunas Univ Technol, Inst Environm Engn, Gedimino Str 50, LT-44239 Kaunas, Lithuania
关键词
End-of-life vehicles; Waste treatment; Material flow analysis; Life cycle assessment; Economic benefit; Electric car; OF-LIFE VEHICLES; CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2022.01.009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Reuse, recovery, and recycling of end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) are encouraged owing to various economic and environmental benefits. Automotive remanufacturing serves as a specific circular marketing system for the reuse of recovered parts that can bring economic benefits for both dismantling companies and consumers. This study aimed to reveal the economic and environmental benefits of the end-of-life treatment of electric, hybrid, and conventional passenger cars. This research presents an economic assessment of the reuse of ELV parts based on a material flow analysis (MFA) and a practical analysis of the prices of these parts in the Lithuanian market. The environmental assessment of the reuse of ELV parts was performed using an MFA, the CO2 equivalents for the production of different materials, and a life cycle assessment methodology. The results showed that 38% of all electric and hybrid ELV parts, and 27% and 28% of diesel- and petrol-powered ELV parts, respectively, can be sold (reused). The economic benefit across all four types of ELVs could amount to savings of up to 12,739 Eur and 51,281 Eur for the dismantlers and passenger car consumers, respectively. The greatest CO2 savings result from reusing the parts of electric ELVs, whilst the lowest savings come from petrol ELVs.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, COMMUNICATION COMMIS, P640, DOI [10.2833/9937, DOI 10.2833/9937, 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, WEBSITE INT DISMANTL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Official Journal of the European Union, V269, P34, DOI 2004R0726 - v.7 of 05.06
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040: Environmental management -- Life cycle assessment -- Principles and framework
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A European Strategy for Data
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, [No title captured]
[7]   CO2 Footprint and Life-Cycle Costs of Electrochemical Energy Storage for Stationary Grid Applications [J].
Baumann, M. ;
Peters, J. F. ;
Weil, M. ;
Grunwald, A. .
ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 5 (07) :1071-1083
[8]   Life cycle assessment of hybrid vehicles recycling: Comparison of three business lines of dismantling [J].
Belboom, Sandra ;
Lewis, Gregory ;
Bareel, Pierre-Francois ;
Leonard, Angelique .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 50 :184-193
[9]  
Brunner Rechberger, 2016, HDB MAT FLOW ANAL EN, Vsecond, DOI [10.1201/9781315313450, DOI 10.1201/9781315313450]
[10]  
Chen Yisong, 2019, International Journal of Environmental Studies, V76, P1019, DOI [10.1080/00207233.2019.1618670, 10.1080/00207233.2019.1618670]