共 50 条
The QardioArm Blood Pressure App for Self-Measurement in an Obese Population: Validation Study Using the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol Revision 2010
被引:6
|作者:
Mazoteras-Pardo, Victoria
[1
]
Becerro-De-Bengoa-Vallejo, Ricardo
[1
]
Elena Losa-Iglesias, Marta
[2
]
Lopez-Lopez, Daniel
[3
]
Palomo-Lopez, Patricia
[4
]
Rodriguez-Sanz, David
[1
,5
]
Calvo-Lobo, Cesar
[6
]
机构:
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Enfermeria Fisioterapia & Podol, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Fac Hlth Sci, Alcorcon, Spain
[3] Univ A Coruna, Fac Nursing & Podiatry, Dept Hlth Sci, Res Hlth & Podiatry Unit, Ferrol, Spain
[4] Univ Extremadura, Univ Ctr Plasencia, Avda Virgen del Puerto 2, Plasencia 10600, Spain
[5] Univ Europea Madrid, Fac Sports, Villaviciosa De Odon, Spain
[6] Univ Leon, Inst Biomed, Dept Nursing & Phys Therapy, Fac Hlth Sci, Ponferrada, Spain
来源:
JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH
|
2018年
/
6卷
/
10期
关键词:
obesity;
blood pressure determination;
M3 INTELLISENSE HEM-7051-E;
MEASURING DEVICES;
MANAGEMENT;
RECOMMENDATIONS;
DISEASE;
HEALTH;
ADULTS;
RISK;
D O I:
10.2196/11632
中图分类号:
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Obesity and high blood pressure (HBP) pose high cardiovascular risks, and they are frequent causes of cardiovascular disease. Objective: The aim of this study was to validate the mobile app QardioArm for high blood pressure monitoring in obese subjects (body mass index >= 30 kg/m(2)) according to guidelines in the European Society of Hypertension-International Protocol 2 (ESH-IP2). Methods: We recruited 33 obese subjects and measured their blood pressure using QardioArm (test device) and Omron M3 Intellisense (Omron Healthcare, Kyoto, Japan; standard device). We compared systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR) according to the ESH-IP2. Results: A total of 95 of 99 differences for SBP and 91 of 99 for DBP displayed absolute differences within 10 mm Hg. A total of 98 of 99 differences for SBP and 98 of 99 for DBP exhibited absolute differences within 15 mm Hg. This result satisfied requirements for part 1 of the ESH-IP2. A total of 27 out of 33 individuals for SBP and 30 out of 33 individuals for DBP had a minimum of 2 of 3 comparisons within 5 mm Hg difference. None of the subjects had 3 differences outside 5 mm Hg for SBP and DBP, satisfying part 2 of the ESH-IP2. For HR measurements, a total of 90 of 99 differences had absolute differences within 3 beats per minute (bpm), and a total of 94 or 99 differences had absolute differences within 5 bpm. A total of 98 of 99 differences had absolute differences within 8 bpm. Therefore, the test device satisfied part 1 of ESH-IP2 criteria for HR. For part 2 of ESH-IP2, 31 of 33 individuals had a minimum of 2 of 3 comparisons within 3 bpm difference for HR. Only 1 of 33 subjects had 3 differences outside 3 bpm. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this was the first study to show that an app that measures blood pressure and HR meets the requirements of the ESH-IP2 in an obese population. We believe the ESH-IP2 should publish explicit criteria for validation of blood pressure devices in specific populations.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文