Ability of chest X-ray to detect faint shadows documented as ground-glass attenuation in images of computed tomography: A comparison between flat-panel detector radiography and film-screen radiography

被引:1
作者
Nagatani, Yukihiro [1 ]
Nitta, Norihisa [1 ]
Ikeda, Mitsuru [2 ]
Kitahara, Hitoshi [1 ]
Otani, Hideji [1 ]
Seko, Ayumi [1 ]
Tanaka, Toyohiko [1 ]
Murakami, Yoko [1 ]
Takahashi, Masashi [1 ]
Murata, Kiyoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiga Univ Med Sci, Dept Radiol, Shiga 5202121, Japan
[2] Nagoya Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol Technol, Higashi Ku, Nagoya, Aichi 4618673, Japan
关键词
Flat-panel detector; Ground-glass attenuation; Computed tomography; Post-processing; Faint shadow; Digital radiography; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; LARGE-AREA; AMORPHOUS-SILICON; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEM; PRINCIPLES; PARAMETERS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.057
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare flat-panel detector (FPD) radiography and film-screen (FS) radiography in detectability of faint shadows documented as ground-glass attenuation (GGA) areas in images of computed tomography (CT). Materials and methods: Study population was comprised of 50 patients who underwent FS and another 50 patients who underwent FPD. Standard of reference (SOR) was determined on the basis of area of GGA in all cross-sections of CT, in terms of GGA extent and presence or absence of GGA in each trisected lung fields (GGA distribution). Eight radiologists assessed the GGA extent with the 5-grade scale and the GGA distribution. Inter-observer variances of the GGA extents and distributions, degree of divergences and correspondence in the GGA extent and distributions with SOR, were compared between the FS and FPD by the jackknife method and Fisher's exact test. Results: Inter-observer variance in the GGA extent and distribution were slightly larger in the FS than in the FPD. The GGA extent scale corresponded with SOR in the FS statistically significantly better (p = 0.001), as the correct ratio was 0.428 in the FS and 0.310 in the FPD. Divergence in the GGA extent scale with SOR was smaller in the FS, as average kappa pseudo-value of Kendall's rank correlation coefficient was 0.474 in the FS and 0.433 in the FPD. Conclusion: These results indicate that some lesions of GGA documented in CT may not be reflected and are difficult to be detected in chest X-ray radiographs with the FPD. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 390
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Principles of digital radiography with large-area, electronically readable detectors: A review of the basics [J].
Chotas, HG ;
Dobbins, JT ;
Ravin, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 210 (03) :595-599
[2]   DIGITAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHY - COMPARISON OF UNPROCESSED AND PROCESSED IMAGES IN THE DETECTION OF SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULES [J].
CORREA, J ;
SOUTO, M ;
TAHOCES, PG ;
MALAGARI, KS ;
TUCKER, DM ;
LARKIN, JJ ;
KUHLMAN, J ;
BARNES, GT ;
ZERHOUNI, EA ;
FRASER, RG ;
VIDAL, JJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (01) :253-258
[3]   EFFICACY OF DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY FOR THE DETECTION OF PNEUMOTHORAX - COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHY [J].
ELAM, EA ;
REHM, K ;
HILLMAN, BJ ;
MALONEY, K ;
FAJARDO, LL ;
MCNEILL, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1992, 158 (03) :509-514
[4]  
FOLEY WD, 1990, RADIOLOGY, V174, P763
[5]   Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography [J].
Ganten, M ;
Radeleff, B ;
Kampschulte, A ;
Daniels, MD ;
Kauffmann, GW ;
Hansmann, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (01) :171-176
[6]   Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging:: Diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study [J].
Garmer, M ;
Hennigs, SP ;
Jäger, HJ ;
Schrick, F ;
van de Loo, T ;
Jacobs, A ;
Hanusch, A ;
Christmann, A ;
Mathias, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (01) :75-80
[7]  
HOPPNER S, 2002, P SPIE, V4681
[8]   INTERPRETATION OF SUBTLE INTERSTITIAL LUNG ABNORMALITIES - CONVENTIONAL VERSUS FILM-DIGITIZED RADIOGRAPHY [J].
KIDO, S ;
IKEZOE, J ;
TAKEUCHI, N ;
KONDOH, H ;
JOHKOH, T ;
KOHNO, N ;
TOMIYAMA, N ;
YAMAGAMI, H ;
NAITO, H ;
ARISAWA, J ;
KOZUKA, T .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 192 (01) :171-176
[9]  
NEIZEL U, 1994, MED PHYS, V21, P509
[10]   Principles of image processing in digital chest radiography [J].
Prokop, M ;
Neitzel, U ;
Schaefer-Prokop, C .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2003, 18 (03) :148-164