A Prospective Multicenter Study on the Outcome of Type I Collagen Hydrogel-Based Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (CaReS) for the Repair of Articular Cartilage Defects in the Knee

被引:111
作者
Schneider, Ulrich
Rackwitz, Lars
Andereya, Stefan
Fensky, Florian
Reichert, Johannes
Loeer, Ingo
Barthel, Thomas
Rudert, Maximilian
Noeth, Ulrich
机构
[1] Univ Aachen, Dept Orthopaed Surg, D-5100 Aachen, Germany
[2] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Wurzburg, Germany
关键词
CaReS; type I collagen hydrogel; matrix-associated ACI; chondral and osteochondral lesion of the knee; prospective study; OSTEOCHONDRAL DEFECTS; CHONDRAL DEFECTS; TRANSPLANTATION; MOSAICPLASTY; TISSUE; JOINT; ACT;
D O I
10.1177/0363546511423369
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Cartilage Regeneration System (CaReS) is a novel matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) technique for the treatment of chondral and osteochondral lesions (Outerbridge grades III and IV). For this technology, no expansion of the chondrocytes in a monolayer culture is needed, and a homogeneous cell distribution within the gel is guaranteed. Purpose: To report a prospective multicenter study of matrix-associated ACI of the knee using a new type I collagen hydrogel (CaReS). Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: From 2003 to 2008, 116 patients (49 women and 67 men; mean age, 32.5 +/- 8.9 years) had CaReS implantation of the knee in 9 different centers. On the basis of the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) Cartilage Injury Evaluation Package 2000, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, pain score (visual analog scale [VAS]), SF-36 score, overall treatment satisfaction and the IKDC functional status were evaluated. Patient follow-up was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and annually thereafter. Mean follow-up was 30.2 +/- 17.4 months (range, 12-60 months). There were 67 defects of the medial condyle, 14 of the lateral, 22 of the patella/trochlea, and 3 of the tibial plateau, and 10 patients had 2 lesions. The mean defect size was 5.4 +/- 2.4 cm(2). Thirty percent of the defects were < 4 cm(2) and 70% were > 4 cm(2). Results: The IKDC score improved significantly from 42.4 +/- 13.8 preoperatively to 70.5 +/- 18.7 (P < .001) at latest follow-up. Global pain level significantly decreased (P < .001) from 6.7 +/- 2.2 preoperatively to 3.2 +/- 3.1 at latest follow-up. There also was a significant increase of both components of the SF-36 score. The overall treatment satisfaction was judged as very good or good in 88% by the surgeon and 80% by the patient. The IKDC functional knee status was grade I in 23.4%, II in 56.3%, III in 17.2%, and IV in 3.1% of the patients. Conclusion: Matrix-associated ACI employing the CaReS technology for the treatment of chondral or osteochondral defects of the knee is a safe and clinically effective treatment that yields significant functional improvement and improvement in pain level. However, further investigation is necessary to determine the long-term viability and clinical outcome of this procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:2558 / 2565
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
AICHER WK, 2003, PRAXISLEITFADEN KNOR, P143
[2]   What factors influence the results of ACT when the indication limits are exceeded? [J].
Andereya, S ;
Mumme, T ;
Müller-Rath, R ;
Schneider, U .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 2004, 142 (06) :651-658
[3]  
ANDEREYA S, 2004, Z PHYSIOTHERAPEUTEN, V2, P226
[4]  
Anders S, 2001, ORTHOPADE, V30, P866, DOI 10.1007/s001320170023
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, ICRS Cartilage Evaluation Package
[6]   Autologous chondrocyte implantation versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee [J].
Bartlett, W ;
Skinner, JA ;
Gooding, CR ;
Carrington, RWJ ;
Flanagan, AM ;
Briggs, TWR ;
Bentley, G .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2005, 87B (05) :640-645
[7]   Recommendations for indication and application of ACT of the joined advisory board of the German societies for Traumatology (DGU) and Orthopaedic Surgery (DGOOC) [J].
Behrens, P ;
Bosch, U ;
Bruns, J ;
Erggelet, C ;
Esenwein, SA ;
Gaissmaier, C ;
Krackhardt, T ;
Löhnert, J ;
Marlovits, S ;
Meenen, NM ;
Mollenhauer, J ;
Nehrer, S ;
Niethard, FU ;
Nöth, U ;
Perka, C ;
Richter, W ;
Schäfer, D ;
Schneider, U ;
Steinwachs, M ;
Weise, K .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 2004, 142 (05) :529-539
[8]   A prospective, randomised comparison of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for osteochondral defects in the knee [J].
Bentley, G ;
Biant, LC ;
Carrington, RWJ ;
Akmal, M ;
Goldberg, A ;
Williams, AM ;
Skinner, JA ;
Pringle, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2003, 85B (02) :223-230
[9]   Histological evaluation of chondral defects after autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee [J].
Briggs, TWR ;
Mahroof, S ;
David, LA ;
Flannelly, DJ ;
Pringle, J ;
Bayliss, M .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2003, 85B (07) :1077-1083
[10]   TREATMENT OF DEEP CARTILAGE DEFECTS IN THE KNEE WITH AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE TRANSPLANTATION [J].
BRITTBERG, M ;
LINDAHL, A ;
NILSSON, A ;
OHLSSON, C ;
ISAKSSON, O ;
PETERSON, L .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (14) :889-895