Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: A comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease

被引:56
|
作者
Zimmermann, Frederik M. [1 ]
De Bruyne, Bernard [2 ]
Pijls, Nico H. J. [1 ,3 ]
Desai, Manisha [4 ,5 ]
Oldroyd, Keith G. [6 ]
Park, Seung-Jung [7 ]
Reardon, Michael J. [8 ]
Wendler, Olaf [9 ]
Woo, Joseph [10 ]
Yeung, Alan C. [10 ]
Fearon, William F. [10 ]
机构
[1] Catharina Hosp, Dept Cardiol, NL-5623 EJ Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Cardiovasc Ctr Aalst, Aalst, Belgium
[3] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Biomed Engn, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Inst Canc, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[6] Golden Jubilee Natl Hosp, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[7] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Heart Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vasc Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Houston, TX USA
[9] Kings Hlth Partners, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Kings Coll Hosp, London, England
[10] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Div Cardiovasc Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
PACLITAXEL-ELUTING STENTS; 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; MEDICAL THERAPY; REVASCULARIZATION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; RESOLUTE; OUTCOMES; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2015.06.024
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Guidelines recommend coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery over percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of 3-vessel coronary artery disease (3-VD). The inferior results of PCI demonstrated by previous large randomized trials comparing PCI and CABG might be explained by the use of suboptimal stent technology and by the lack of fractional flow reserve (FFR) guidance of PCI. Trial design The objective of this investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized clinical trial is to investigate whether FFR-guided PCI with new-generation stents is noninferior to CABG in patients with 3-VD, not including the left main coronary artery. Eligible patients must have >= 50% coronary stenoses in all 3 major epicardial vessels or major side branches. Patients with a nondominant right coronary artery may be included only if the left anterior descending artery and left circumflex have >= 50% stenoses. Consecutive patients who meet all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be randomized in a 1: 1 fashion to either CABG or FFR-guided PCI. Coronary artery bypass graft will be performed based on the angiogram as per clinical routine. Patients assigned to FFR-guided PCI will have FFR measured in each diseased vessel and only undergo stenting if the FFR is <= 0.80. The primary end point of the study is a composite of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, including death, myocardial infarction, repeat coronary revascularization, and stroke at 1 year. Key secondary end point will be a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke at 3-year follow-up. Other secondary end points include the individual adverse events, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life at 2-year, 3-year, with up to 5-year follow-up. Conclusion The FAME 3 study will compare in a multicenter, randomized fashion FFR-guided PCI with contemporary drug-eluting stents to CABG in patients with 3-VD.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A protocol update of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 trial: A comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease
    Zimmermann, Frederik M.
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Desai, Manisha
    Oldroyd, Keith G.
    Reardon, Michael J.
    Wendler, Olaf
    Woo, Joseph
    Yeung, Alan C.
    Fearon, William F.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 214 : 156 - 157
  • [2] Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting or Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Diabetic Patients With Multivessel Disease
    Di Gioia, Giuseppe
    Soto Flores, Nina
    Franco, Danilo
    Colaiori, Iginio
    Sonck, Jeroen
    Gigante, Carlo
    Kodeboina, Monika
    Bartunek, Jozef
    Vanderheyden, Marc
    Van Praet, Frank
    Casselman, Filip
    Degriek, Ivan
    Stockman, Bernard
    Barbato, Emanuele
    Collet, Carlos
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 13 (10) : E009157
  • [3] The impact of age on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial substudy
    Lim, Hong-Seok
    Tonino, Pim A. L.
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Yong, Andy S. C.
    Lee, Bong-Ki
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Fearon, William F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 177 (01) : 66 - 70
  • [4] Does Age Affect Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention? A FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Trial Substudy
    Lim, Hong-Seok
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Fearon, William F.
    Lee, Bong-Ki
    Pijls, Nico
    Tonino, Pim A.
    Yong, Andy S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (18) : B25 - B25
  • [5] The Impact of Sex Differences on Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention A FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Substudy
    Kim, Hyun-Sook
    Tonino, Pim A. L.
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Yong, Andy S. C.
    Tremmel, Jennifer A.
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Fearon, William F.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2012, 5 (10) : 1037 - 1042
  • [6] Cost utility of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel coronary artery disease in Brazil
    Stella, Steffan Frosi
    Polanczyk, Carisi Anne
    Arvandi, Marjan
    Siebert, Uwe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2019, 31 (09) : 676 - 681
  • [7] Economic Evaluation of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Disease
    Fearon, William F.
    Bornschein, Bernhard
    Tonino, Pim A. L.
    Gothe, Raffaella M.
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Siebert, Uwe
    CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (24) : 2545 - 2550
  • [8] Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease 2-Year Follow-Up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Study
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Fearon, William F.
    Tonino, Pim A. L.
    Siebert, Uwe
    Ikeno, Fumiaki
    Bornschein, Bernhard
    van't Veer, Marcel
    Klauss, Volker
    Manoharan, Ganesh
    Engstrom, Thomas
    Oldroyd, Keith G.
    Lee, Peter N. Ver
    MacCarthy, Philip A.
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 56 (03) : 177 - 184
  • [9] Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
    Toth, Gabor
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Casselman, Filip
    De Vroey, Frederic
    Pyxaras, Stylianos
    Di Serafino, Luigi
    Van Praet, Frank
    Van Mieghem, Carlos
    Stockman, Bernard
    Wijns, William
    Degrieck, Ivan
    Barbato, Emanuele
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (13) : 1405 - 1411
  • [10] Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Guiding PCI in Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
    Pijls, N.
    Fearon, W.
    HERZ, 2008, 33 (08) : 609 - 609