Rheology of Fiber-Reinforced High-Strength Grout Modified with Polymer Latexes

被引:6
|
作者
Assaad, Joseph J. [1 ,2 ]
Khayat, Kamal H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Balamand, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Balamand, El Koura, Lebanon
[2] Univ Sherbrooke, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Missouri Univ Sci & Technol, Rolla, MO 65409 USA
关键词
bond strength; fibers; high-strength grout; polymers; rheology; thixotropy; BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; CEMENTITIOUS GROUTS; PERFORMANCE; CONCRETE; BEHAVIOR; FLOWABILITY; WATER;
D O I
10.14359/51733104
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Fiber-reinforced high-strength grout (HSG) can secure exceptional mechanical properties; yet, case studies show that the interfacing layer to the existing substrate can be particularly vulnerable when used in specialty repair, precast, and retrofitting applications. Polymeric latex materials such as styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) and acrylic ester (AE) are often incorporated to improve the bond properties and ensure monolithic behavior of the composite system. This paper assesses the concurrent effects of using steel fibers (SFs) and polymeric latexes on the flow and rheology of HSG, including their impact on mechanical properties and bond to existing concrete. The SF content varied from 0 to 5% by volume, while the mixing water was replaced by 10 to 20% of latex. Test results showed that the rheological properties of HSG increased with latex inclusion, given the coalescence of water-soluble polymers in the cementitious matrix that increased the viscosity of the interstitial liquid phase. The viscosity was aggravated with the addition of SF that accentuates the tendency of fiber grouping and interference between solid particles to hinder the ease of flow. The compressive strength slightly decreased when part of the mixing water was replaced by SBR or AE. Yet, in contrast, the flexural properties and pulloff bond strength were remarkably improved, which can be relevant to guarantee the integrity and monolithic behavior of the repair application.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 60
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machinability of High-Strength Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Textile Composites: A Review
    Mali, H. S.
    Sharma, P.
    MECHANICS OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 2023, 59 (01) : 1 - 28
  • [2] Bond properties of high-strength carbon fiber-reinforced polymer strands
    Xue, Weichen
    Wang, Xiaohui
    Zhang, Shulu
    ACI MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2008, 105 (01) : 11 - 19
  • [3] Machinability of High-Strength Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Textile Composites: A Review
    H. S. Mali
    P. Sharma
    Mechanics of Composite Materials, 2023, 59 : 1 - 28
  • [4] DYNAMIC STRENGTH OF POLYMER MODIFIED AND FIBER-REINFORCED CONCRETES
    BHARGAVA, J
    REHNSTROM, A
    CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 1977, 7 (02) : 199 - 208
  • [5] Strength and ductility of fiber-reinforced high-strength concrete columns
    Foster, SJ
    Attard, MM
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2001, 127 (01): : 28 - 34
  • [6] Shear behavior of high-strength concrete beams reinforced with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer bars
    Moussa, Amr M. A.
    Said, Hemdan O. A.
    Khodary, Farag
    Hassanean, Yahia A.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2025, 325
  • [7] Flexural behavior of steel fiber-reinforced high-strength lightweight aggregate concrete beams reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars
    Wu T.
    Sun Y.
    Liu X.
    Wei H.
    Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures, 2020, 41 (04): : 129 - 139and159
  • [8] Shear Strength of Externally U-Bonded Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer High-Strength Reinforced Concrete
    Ibrahim, Basil
    Leblouba, Moussa
    Altoubat, Salah
    Barakat, Samer
    MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (13)
  • [9] Effect of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Confinement on Bond Strength of Hooked Bars in High-Strength Concrete
    Hamad, Bilal S.
    Abs, Charbel. D. Bou
    ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2009, 106 (06) : 831 - 839
  • [10] Effect of Member Depth on Shear Strength of High-Strength Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Reinforced Concrete Beams
    Alam, M. S.
    Hussein, A.
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 16 (02) : 119 - 126