Validation of a digital identification tool for individuals at risk for hereditary cancer syndromes

被引:5
作者
Bucheit, Leslie [1 ]
Taber, Katherine Johansen [1 ]
Ready, Kaylene [1 ]
机构
[1] Counsyl, 180 Kimball Way, San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
关键词
BRCA1; BRCA2; Hereditary breast and ovarian Cancer; Lynch syndrome; Hereditary cancer; Family history screening; Risk assessment; Digital tool; Health information technology; FAMILY-HISTORY; AMERICAN SOCIETY; MULTIGENE PANELS; BREAST-CANCER; MUTATIONS; WOMEN; COLLECTION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13053-018-0099-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe number of individuals meeting criteria for genetic counseling and testing for hereditary cancer syndromes (HCS) is far less than the number that actually receive it. To facilitate identification of patients at risk for HCS, Counsyl developed a digital identification tool (digital ID tool) to match personal and family cancer history to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) BRCA-related Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC), Lynch syndrome, and polyposis testing criteria in one-to-one, automated fashion. The purpose of this study was to validate the ability of the digital ID tool to accurately identify histories that do and do not meet NCCN testing criteria.MethodsThird-party recorded three-generation pedigrees were retrospectively reviewed by a certified genetic counselor (CGC) to determine if independent events included in pedigree histories met NCCN guidelines, and were then sorted into groups: high risk events (meets criteria) and low risk events (does not meet criteria). Events were entered into the digital ID tool to determine the extent of its concordance with events sorted by CGC review. Statistical tests of accuracy were calculated at a 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsOne hundred ninety-seven pedigrees were reviewed consecutively representing 765 independent events for analysis across groups. 382/382 (100%) high risk events identified by the digital ID tool and 381/383 (99.47%) low risk events identified by the digital ID tool were concordant with CGC sorting. The digital ID tool had a sensitivity of 100% (99.04-100% CI) and specificity of 99.48% (98.13-99.94% CI). The overall accuracy of the digital ID tool was estimated to be 99.74% (99.06-99.97% CI), reflecting the rate at which the digital ID tool reached the same conclusion as that of CGC review of pedigree events for the recommendation of genetic testing for individuals at risk for HCS.ConclusionsThe digital ID tool accurately matches NCCN criteria in one-to-one fashion to identify at-risk individuals for HCS and may be useful in clinical practice, specifically for BRCA-related HBOC and Lynch Syndrome.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Validation of a self-administered, computerized tool for collecting and displaying the family history of cancer [J].
Acheson, Louise S. ;
Zyzanski, Stephen J. ;
Stange, Kurt C. ;
Deptowicz, Amy ;
Wiesner, Georgia L. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (34) :5395-5402
[2]  
[Anonymous], CANC FACTS FIG 2017
[3]   Characteristics associated with genetic counseling referral and BRCA1/2 testing among women in a large integrated health system [J].
Bellcross, Cecelia A. ;
Peipins, Lucy A. ;
McCarty, Frances A. ;
Rodriguez, Juan L. ;
Hawkins, Nikki A. ;
Alford, Sharon Hensley ;
Leadbetter, Steven .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 17 (01) :43-50
[4]   Interactive e-counselling for genetics pre-test decisions: where are we now? [J].
Birch, P. H. .
CLINICAL GENETICS, 2015, 87 (03) :209-217
[5]   National Estimates of Genetic Testing in Women With a History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer [J].
Childers, Christopher P. ;
Childers, Kimberly K. ;
Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda ;
Macinko, James .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (34) :3800-+
[6]   Inherited Mutations in 17 Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes Among a Large Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cohort Unselected for Family History of Breast Cancer [J].
Couch, Fergus J. ;
Hart, Steven N. ;
Sharma, Priyanka ;
Toland, Amanda Ewart ;
Wang, Xianshu ;
Miron, Penelope ;
Olson, Janet E. ;
Godwin, Andrew K. ;
Pankratz, V. Shane ;
Olswold, Curtis ;
Slettedahl, Seth ;
Hallberg, Emily ;
Guidugli, Lucia ;
Davila, Jaime I. ;
Beckmann, Matthias W. ;
Janni, Wolfgang ;
Rack, Brigitte ;
Ekici, Arif B. ;
Slamon, Dennis J. ;
Konstantopoulou, Irene ;
Fostira, Florentia ;
Vratimos, Athanassios ;
Fountzilas, George ;
Pelttari, Liisa M. ;
Tapper, William J. ;
Durcan, Lorraine ;
Cross, Simon S. ;
Pilarski, Robert ;
Shapiro, Charles L. ;
Klemp, Jennifer ;
Yao, Song ;
Garber, Judy ;
Cox, Angela ;
Brauch, Hiltrud ;
Ambrosone, Christine ;
Nevanlinna, Heli ;
Yannoukakos, Drakoulis ;
Slager, Susan L. ;
Vachon, Celine M. ;
Eccles, Diana M. ;
Fasching, Peter A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (04) :304-U154
[7]   BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations and risk of breast cancer public health perspectives [J].
Coughlin, SS ;
Khoury, MJ ;
Steinberg, KK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1999, 16 (02) :91-98
[8]   Physicians' Awareness and Utilization of Genetic Services in Texas [J].
Diamonstein, Callie ;
Stevens, Blair ;
Hashmi, S. Shahrukh ;
Refuerzo, Jerrie ;
Sullivan, Cathy ;
Hoskovec, Jennifer .
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2018, 27 (04) :968-977
[9]   Formative Evaluation of Clinician Experience with Integrating Family History-Based Clinical Decision Support into Clinical Practice [J].
Doerr, Megan ;
Edelman, Emily ;
Gabitzsch, Emily ;
Eng, Charis ;
Teng, Kathryn .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2014, 4 (02) :115-136
[10]   Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Other Hereditary Syndromes: Using Technology to Identify Carriers [J].
Drohan, Brian ;
Roche, Constance A. ;
Cusack, James C., Jr. ;
Hughes, Kevin S. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (06) :1732-1737