Location, quality and choice of hospital: Evidence from England 2002-2013

被引:63
作者
Moscelli, Giuseppe [1 ]
Siciliani, Luigi [1 ,2 ]
Gutacker, Nils [1 ]
Gravelle, Hugh [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Econ Social & Hlth Care Res Unit, Ctr Hlth Econ, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ York, Dept Econ & Related Studies, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
Hospital; Choice; Quality; Waiting times; Distance; Rurality; RURAL MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES; OF-CARE; PATIENT; READMISSIONS; REPLACEMENT; NETHERLANDS; COMPETITION; SERVICES; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.07.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We investigate (a) how patient choice of hospital for elective hip replacement is influenced by distance, quality and waiting times, (b) differences in choices between patients in urban and rural locations, (c) the relationship between hospitals' elasticities of demand to quality and the number of local rivals, and how these changed after relaxation of constraints on hospital choice in England in 2006. Using a data set on over 500,000 elective hip replacement patients over the period 2002 to 2013 we find that patients became more likely to travel to a provider with higher quality or lower waiting times, the proportion of patients bypassing their nearest provider increased from 25% to almost 50%, and hospital elasticity of demand with respect to own quality increased. By 2013 average hospital demand elasticity with respect to readmission rates and waiting times were -0.2 and -0.04. Providers facing more rivals had demand that was more elastic with respect to quality and waiting times. Patients from rural areas have smaller disutility from distance. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 124
页数:13
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
ADAMS EK, 1991, HEALTH SERV RES, V26, P583
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Discrete choice methods with simulation
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, QOL OFF CHECKL INSTR
[4]  
Appleby J., 2005, WORKING PAPER
[5]   The association between the quality of inpatient care and early readmission - A meta-analysis of the evidence [J].
Ashton, CM ;
DelJunco, DJ ;
Souchek, J ;
Wray, NP ;
Mansyur, CL .
MEDICAL CARE, 1997, 35 (10) :1044-1059
[6]  
Askildsen J., 2013, WAITING TIME POLICIE
[7]   Quality of care for acute myocardial infarction in rural and urban US hospitals [J].
Baldwin, LM ;
MacLehose, RF ;
Hart, LG ;
Beaver, SK ;
Every, N ;
Chan, L .
JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2004, 20 (02) :99-108
[8]   Early readmissions to the department of medicine as a screening tool for monitoring quality of care problems [J].
Balla, Uri ;
Malnick, Stephen ;
Schatmer, Ami .
MEDICINE, 2008, 87 (05) :294-300
[9]   Choice of NHS-funded Hospital Services in England* [J].
Beckert, Walter ;
Christensen, Mette ;
Collyer, Kate .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2012, 122 (560) :400-417
[10]   Incentives, choice, and accountability in the provision of public services [J].
Besley, T ;
Ghatak, M .
OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2003, 19 (02) :235-249