GIS-based groundwater vulnerability modelling: A case study of the Witbank, Ermelo and Highveld Coalfields in South Africa

被引:10
作者
Sakala, E. [1 ,2 ]
Fourie, F. [2 ]
Gomo, M. [2 ]
Coetzee, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Council Geosci, P Bag X112, ZA-0001 Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Univ Free State, IGS, P Box 339, ZA-9300 Bloemfontein, South Africa
关键词
Mineral systems approach; Groundwater vulnerability; Fuzzy; Acid mine drainage; Pollution; Coalfield; PROSPECTIVITY ANALYSIS; MINERAL SYSTEMS; OROGENIC GOLD; EXPLORATION; TOOL; DEPOSITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.09.012
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
In the last 20 years, the popular mineral systems approach has been used successfully for the exploration of various mineral commodities at various scales owing to its scientific soundness, cost effectiveness and simplicity in mapping the critical processes required for the formation of deposits. In the present study this approach was modified for the assessment of groundwater vulnerability. In terms of the modified approach, water drives the pollution migration processes, with various analogies having been derived from the mineral systems approach. The modified approach is illustrated here by the discussion of a case study of acid mine drainage (AMD) pollution in the Witbank, Ermelo and Highveld coalfields of the Mpumalanga and KwaZulu-Natal Provinces in South Africa. Many AMD cases have been reported in these provinces in recent years and are a cause of concern for local municipalities, mining and environmental agencies. In the Witbank, Ermelo and Highveld coalfields, several areas have been mined out while mining has not yet started in others, hence the need to identify groundwater regions prone to AMD pollution in order to avoid further impacts on the groundwater resources. A knowledge-based fuzzy expert system was built using vulnerability factors (energy sources, ligands sources, pollutant sources, transportation pathways and traps) to generate a groundwater vulnerability model of the coalfields. Highly vulnerable areas were identified in Witbank coalfield and the eastern part of the Ermelo coalfield which are characterised by the presence of AMD sources, good subsurface transport coupled with poor AMD pollution trapping properties. The results from the analysis indicate significant correlations between model values and both groundwater sulphate concentrations as well as pH. This shows that the proposed approach can indeed be used as an alternative to traditional methods of groundwater vulnerability assessment. The methodology only considers the AMD pollution attenuation and migration at a regional scale and does not account for local-scale sources of pollution and attenuation. Further research to refine the approach may include the incorporation of groundwater flow direction, rock-pollution reaction time, and temporal datasets for the future prediction of groundwater vulnerability. The approach may be applied to other coalfields to assess its robustness to changing hydrogeological conditions. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 60
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Groundwater vulnerability assessment in central Iran: Integration of GIS-based DRASTIC model and a machine learning approach
    Motlagh, Zeynab Karimzadeh
    Derakhshani, Reza
    Sayadi, Mohammad Hossein
    GROUNDWATER FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 23
  • [42] Groundwater pollution vulnerability assessment in the Assin municipalities of Ghana using GIS-based DRASTIC and SINTACS methods
    Derrick Owusu Mensah
    Emmanuel K. Appiah-Adjei
    Dennis Asante
    Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2023, 9 : 2955 - 2967
  • [43] Groundwater vulnerability assessment using GIS-based DRASTIC model in the upper catchment of Dwarakeshwar river basin, West Bengal, India
    Chakraborty, Baisakhi
    Roy, Sambhunath
    Bera, Amit
    Adhikary, Partha Pratim
    Bera, Biswajit
    Sengupta, Debashish
    Bhunia, Gouri Sankar
    Shit, Pravat Kumar
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2022, 81 (01)
  • [44] Comparative assessment of groundwater vulnerability using GIS-based DRASTIC and DRASTIC-AHP for Thoothukudi District, Tamil Nadu India
    Saravanan, Subbarayan
    Pitchaikani, S.
    Thambiraja, M.
    Sathiyamurthi, Subbarayan
    Sivakumar, Vivek
    Velusamy, Sampathkumar
    Shanmugamoorthy, Manoj
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2023, 195 (01)
  • [45] A GIS-based LVF model for semiquantitative assessment of groundwater pollution risk: A case study in Shenyang, NE China
    Zhang, Junjun
    Zhai, Yuanzheng
    Xue, Pengwei
    Huan, Huan
    Zhao, Xiaobing
    Teng, Yanguo
    Wang, Jinsheng
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2017, 23 (02): : 276 - 298
  • [46] Development of GIS-based fuzzy pattern recognition model (modified DRASTIC model) for groundwater vulnerability to pollution assessment
    Iqbal, J.
    Gorai, A. K.
    Katpatal, Y. B.
    Pathak, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 12 (10) : 3161 - 3174
  • [47] Assessment of groundwater intrinsic vulnerability using GIS-based DRASTIC method in district Karak, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
    Muneer, Muhammad
    Khan, Mumtaz Ali
    Shinwari, Fayaz Ullah
    Ahmed, Ijaz
    Siyar, Syed Mamoon
    Alshehri, Fahad
    Shahab, Muhammad
    FRONTIERS IN WATER, 2025, 7
  • [48] Assessment of groundwater intrinsic vulnerability using GIS-based DRASTIC method in District Haripur, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
    Ahmed, Sohail
    Qadir, Anwar
    Khan, Mumtaz Ali
    Khan, Tahseenullah
    Zafar, Muhammad
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2021, 193 (08)
  • [49] Assessing Groundwater Resource Vulnerability by Coupling GIS-Based DRASTIC and Solute Transport Model in Ajmer District, Rajasthan
    Joshi, Pranjay
    Gupta, Pankaj Kumar
    JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA, 2018, 92 (01) : 101 - 106
  • [50] Development of GIS-based fuzzy pattern recognition model (modified DRASTIC model) for groundwater vulnerability to pollution assessment
    J. Iqbal
    A. K. Gorai
    Y. B. Katpatal
    G. Pathak
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2015, 12 : 3161 - 3174