Life cycle assessment of beef cattle production in two typical grassland systems of southern Brazil

被引:103
作者
Dick, Milene [1 ]
da Silva, Marcelo Abreu [2 ]
Dewes, Homero [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, CEPAN, Ctr Res Agribusiness, BR-91540000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Fac Agron, Forage & Agrometeorol Dept, BR-91540000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Biosci Inst, Dept Biophys, BR-91540000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
Enteric fermentation; Global warming; Impact categories; Native grassland; Sustainable development; Winter pasture; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; CARBON FOOTPRINT; DAIRY PRODUCTION; MILK-PRODUCTION; WESTERN CANADA; WHITE CLOVER; IMPROVEMENT; RYEGRASS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.080
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The importance of animal production in the overall context of human activity is undisputed and influences food supply, job security, income producing, as well as landscape and local ecosystems conservation. This relevance enhances the charges by society as the environmental impacts of various activities, especially in relation to ruminant production amid the current problems of climate changes. In this context, we analyzed the main environmental impacts of two typical beef cattle production systems from southern Brazil, namely the extensive system (ES) and the improved system (IS), and identified the components that have the greatest environmental impacts using the life cycle assessment method. The basis of the system construction was a cattle herd that originated from 100 weaned heifers, four weaned calves, and the progeny of these cattle during their productive life (12 years), and the land areas, external inputs, and other natural resources and technologies necessary to the operations. The functional unit was the production of 1 kg of live weight. The values of greenhouse gas emissions, land use, and freshwater depletion in the ES were higher compared with those values obtained for the IS (22.52 and 9.16 kg CO2 equivalents; 234.78 and 21.03 m(2)a; and 0.217 and 0.0949 m(3), respectively). These variations were attributed to the permanence time of the animals in each system and to the quality and production of the pastures. The ES presented lower potential impacts than the IS on metal depletion and soil acidification (0.000519 and 0.0536 kg Fe equivalents; and 0.0028 and 0.0038 kg SO2 equivalents, respectively) mainly due to the pasture improvement practices and the salt supply to the animals. Moreover, the values of freshwater eutrophication and fossil depletion were higher in the ES than in the IS (0.00383 and 0.00219 kg P equivalents and 0.0042 and 0.1255 kg oil equivalents, respectively). While the pasture nutrient loss from runoff and leaching defined the values of eutrophication, the introduction of legumes compensates the use of fossil fuels. The diversity of the results provides a better understanding of the environmental impacts of different production systems and of regional singularities. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 434
页数:9
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Producao da Pecuaria Municipal, P65
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 15 SWISS CTR LIF CYC
[3]  
[Anonymous], ISO14040
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, NUTR REQ BEEF CATTL, V8th
[5]   Comparing the environmental impacts of pasture-based and confinement-based dairy systems in Nova Scotia (Canada) using life cycle assessment [J].
Arsenault, Nicole ;
Tyedmers, Peter ;
Fredeen, Alan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2009, 7 (01) :19-41
[6]   Life cycle assessment of milk produced in two smallholder dairy systems in the highlands and the coast of Peru [J].
Bartl, Karin ;
Gomez, Carlos A. ;
Nemecek, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (13) :1494-1505
[7]   Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada - Evaluation using farm-based life cycle assessment [J].
Beauchemin, K. A. ;
Janzen, H. H. ;
Little, S. M. ;
McAllister, T. A. ;
McGinn, S. M. .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 166-67 :663-677
[8]   Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada: A case study [J].
Beauchemin, Karen A. ;
Janzen, H. Henry ;
Little, Shannan M. ;
McAllister, Tim A. ;
McGinn, Sean M. .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2010, 103 (06) :371-379
[9]   On the overlap between effect and response plant functional types linked to grazing [J].
Blanco, C. C. ;
Sosinski, E. E., Jr. ;
dos Santos, B. R. C. ;
da Silva, M. A. ;
Pillar, V. D. .
COMMUNITY ECOLOGY, 2007, 8 (01) :57-65
[10]  
Capper JL, 2009, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH ANNUAL TRI-STATE DAIRY NUTRITION CONFERENCE, P71