Modular endoprosthetic replacement for failed internal fixation of the proximal femur following trauma

被引:37
作者
Dean, Benjamin John Floyd [1 ]
Matthews, Jon J. [1 ]
Price, Andrew [1 ]
Stubbs, David [1 ]
Whitwell, Duncan [1 ]
Gibbons, Christopher M. L. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nuffield Orthopaed Ctr, Oxford OX3 7LD, England
关键词
HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; FRACTURES;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-011-1332-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Although originally designed for reconstruction after primary malignant bone tumour resection, modular endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) can be used in salvage surgery for complex periprosthetic fracture and failed internal fixation. The purpose of this study was to assess the functional outcome following EPR for failed internal fixation of the proximal femur. We assessed clinical and functional outcomes of using a modular tumour endoprosthesis to reconstruct the proximal femur following failed internal fixation in eight consecutive patients between 2001 and 2008. There were four men and four women, with a mean age of 67.5 (range 50-79) years and a mean follow-up of 16.5 (6-36) months. All patients had failed internal fixation for traumatic proximal femoral fractures-four 31.A2.3, two 31.A3.1, two 31.A3.3 using the Arbeitsgemeinshaft fur Osteosynthesefragen (AO) fracture classification. Mean time from the first attempted internal fixation to definitive EPR was 34 (6-102) months, and the median number of previous surgical procedures was two (1-11). Histology revealed infection (two cases), uninfected nonunion (five cases) and plasmocytoma (one case). The EPR was carried out as a one-stage procedure in six cases and a two-stage procedure in two cases. Mean postoperative Harris Hip Score was 71.4 (range 64-85). There were no surgical complications. One patient died as a result of systemic complications of myeloma several years following EPR. EPR is an effective salvage procedure for failed fixation of traumatic proximal femoral fractures. Immediate weightbearing and a good functional outcome can be expected in this difficult group of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 734
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] THE INCIDENCE OF PROXIMAL FEMORAL FRACTURES IN AN ENGLISH COUNTY
    ANDERSON, GH
    RAYMAKERS, R
    GREGG, PJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1993, 75 (03): : 441 - 444
  • [2] A 6-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF INFECTED TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS MANAGED BY GIRDLESTONES ARTHROPLASTY
    BOURNE, RB
    HUNTER, GA
    RORABECK, CH
    MACNAB, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1984, 66 (03): : 340 - 343
  • [3] Modular endoprosthetic replacement for tumours of the proximal femur
    Chandrasekar, C. R.
    Grimer, R. J.
    Carter, S. R.
    Tillman, R. M.
    Abudu, A.
    Buckley, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2009, 91B (01): : 108 - 112
  • [4] Freedman EL, 1997, ORTHOPEDICS, V20, P27
  • [5] Two-stage uncemented revision hip arthroplasty for infection
    Haddad, FS
    Muirhead-Allwood, SK
    Manktelow, ARJ
    Bacarese-Hamilton, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2000, 82B (05): : 689 - 694
  • [6] Use of an 'internal proximal femoral replacement' with distal fixation in revision arthroplasty of the hip
    Jaiswal, P. K.
    Jagiello, J.
    David, L. A.
    Blunn, G.
    Carrington, R. W. J.
    Skinner, J. A.
    Cannon, S. R.
    Briggs, T. W. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2008, 90B (01): : 11 - 15
  • [7] Comparison of the results of the Girdlestone pseudarthrosis with reimplantation of a total hip replacement
    Schroder, J
    Saris, D
    Besselaar, PP
    Marti, RK
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 1998, 22 (04) : 215 - 218
  • [8] Girdlestone resection arthroplasty following failed surgical procedures
    Sharma, H
    De Leeuw, J
    Rowley, DI
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2005, 29 (02) : 92 - 95
  • [9] Hip arthroplasty for failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures
    Zhang, BS
    Chiu, KY
    Wang, MY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2004, 19 (03) : 329 - 333