Efficiency of Class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with 3 and 4 premolar extractions

被引:8
作者
Janson, Guilherme [1 ]
Baldo, Taiana [1 ]
Garib, Daniela [1 ,2 ]
Barros, Sergio Estelita [3 ]
Poletto, Raquel Silva [1 ]
dos Santos, Patricia Bittencourt [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Dent Sch, Dept Orthodont, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Rehabil Craniofacial Anomalies, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Orthodont, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT; PROTOCOLS; DURATION; INDEX; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.02.028
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: In this study, we compared the efficiency of Class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with symmetric and asymmetric extractions. Methods: A sample of 71 patients with complete Class II subdivision malocclusion was selected: group 1 consisted of 40 patients treated with 4 premolar extractions with an initial mean age of 13.37 years, and group 2 had 31 patients treated with 3 premolar extractions (2 maxillary premolars and 1 mandibular premolar on the Class I side) with an initial mean age of 14.44 years. To compare the efficiency of each treatment protocol, the initial and final occlusal results were evaluated on dental casts with the Peer Assessment Rating occlusal index, and time spent in treatment was calculated from the clinical charts. The amounts of initial and final midline deviation and improvement of midline deviation correction were also evaluated. Efficiency was calculated as the rate between occlusal improvement by the treatment time. The groups were compared with t and Mann-Whitney tests. Results: The results showed that group 2 had a significantly smaller final amount of midline deviation and a greater correction of midline deviation. Conclusions: Treatment efficiency of type 1 Class II subdivision malocclusions with 3 or 4 premolar extractions is similar. However, treatment with 3 premolar extractions provides a better occlusal success rate.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 503
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   PREDICTION OF MANDIBULAR GROWTH ROTATION [J].
BJORK, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1969, 55 (06) :585-&
[2]   Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs [J].
Casko, JS ;
Vaden, JL ;
Kokich, VG ;
Damone, J ;
James, RD ;
Cangialosi, TJ ;
Riolo, ML ;
Owens, SE ;
Bills, ED .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1998, 114 (05) :589-599
[3]  
Chew M T, 2000, Aust Orthod J, V16, P98
[4]  
Dahlberg G, 1940, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V14, P358
[5]   THE VALIDATION OF THE PEER ASSESSMENT RATING INDEX FOR MALOCCLUSION SEVERITY AND TREATMENT DIFFICULTY [J].
DEGUZMAN, L ;
BAHIRAEI, D ;
VIG, KWL ;
VIG, PS ;
WEYANT, RJ ;
OBRIEN, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1995, 107 (02) :172-176
[6]   AGE EFFECTS ON ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT - SKELETODENTAL ASSESSMENTS FROM THE JOHNSTON ANALYSIS [J].
HARRIS, EF ;
DYER, GS ;
VADEN, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1991, 100 (06) :531-536
[7]  
Holman JK, 1998, ANGLE ORTHOD, V68, P527
[8]  
Hornby A.S., 1993, OXFORD ADV LEARNERS
[9]   Class II subdivision treatment success rate with symmetric and asymmetric extraction protocols [J].
Janson, G ;
Dainesi, EA ;
Henriques, JFC ;
de Freitas, MR ;
de Lima, KJRS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2003, 124 (03) :257-264
[10]   Class II treatment efficiency in maxillary premolar extraction and nonextraction protocols [J].
Janson, Guilherme ;
Barros, Sergio Estelita Cavalcante ;
de Freitas, Marcos Roberto ;
Henriques, Jose Fernando Castanha ;
Pinzan, Arnaldo .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2007, 132 (04) :490-498