Strategies and measures for sustainable urban transport systems

被引:19
作者
Persia, Luca [1 ]
Cipriani, Ernesto [2 ]
Sgarra, Veronica [1 ]
Meta, Eleonora [3 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Roma, Ctr Ric Trasporto & Logist CTL, Via Eudossiana 18, I-00184 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Roma Tre, Dipartimento Sci Ingn Civile, Via Vito Volterra 62, I-00154 Rome, Italy
[3] Sapienza Univ Roma, Dipartimento Ingn Civile Edile & Ambientale, Via Eudossiana 18, I-00184 Rome, Italy
来源
TRANSPORT RESEARCH ARENA TRA2016 | 2016年 / 14卷
关键词
sustainability; road; enviroment; benchmarking; strategies;
D O I
10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.075
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Increasing sustainability of urban transport systems is a crucial objective of all strategic plans both at national and European level. Different strategies and measures can be adopted to improve the efficiency of transport systems, according to a large set of factors that can affect the results of the implemented actions. A comprehensive study has been carried out in order to define a methodology able to define effective and efficient strategies and measures, allowing to increase the sustainability level of different kinds of cities, from small-medium sized to large metropolitan areas. The methodology has been tested on a group of 50 Italian cities, whose characteristics have been analysed through an initial set of more than 200 indicators. Three main groups of indicators have been taken into account: State indicators, Sustainability indicators, Policy indicators. The main aim has been to identify existing relationships between Sustainability and Policy indicators for cities showing commonalities in terms of State indicators. A correlation analysis allowed to identify 53 relevant indicators from the initial set of 200, while a cluster analysis, based on a hierarchical model, allowed to group the cities into five different groups, according to their population size and density. Correlations between relevant indicators have also been analysed within each group, while linear regression models have allowed to describe some functional relations between Policy and Sustainability indicators. A benchmarking exercise has allowed to identify strategies and measures adopted by the best performers within each group, hence defining possible paths to a better sustainability level for the remaining cities. Finally, recommendations for a correct urban mobility planning procedures have been produced. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:955 / 964
页数:10
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
CIVITAS, 2009, CLEAN BETT TRANSP CI
[2]  
European Commission, 2011, White paper on transport: roadmap to a single European transport area-towards a competitive and resource-efficient transport system
[3]  
IRTAD, 2010, IRTAD ANN REP 2010
[4]  
Kenworthy J, 1999, INT SOURCEBOOK AUTOM, P704
[5]  
KonSult, 2012, KNOWL SUST URB LAND
[6]  
LUTR, 2012, LAND US TRANSP RES P
[7]  
Newman P.W. G., 1989, Cities and Automobile Dependence: A Sourcebook, P388
[8]  
Sustainable Transportation Indicators Subcommittee of the Transportation Research Board, 2008, 2009 TRANSP RES BOAR
[9]  
*UITP, 2005, MOB CIT DAT
[10]  
Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2012, ON LIN TRANSP DEM EN