The Effects of Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:26
|
作者
Ojo, Omorogieva [1 ]
Ojo, Osarhumwese Osaretin [2 ]
Feng, Qianqian [3 ]
Boateng, Joshua [4 ]
Wang, Xiaohua [3 ]
Brooke, Joanne [5 ]
Adegboye, Amanda Rodrigues Amorim [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Greenwich, Sch Hlth Sci Hlth & Human Sci, Fac Educ, Avery Hill Campus,Avery Hill Rd, London SE9 2UG, England
[2] South London & Maudsley NHS Fdn Trust, Univ Hosp, Smoking Cessat Dept, Lewisham High St, London SE13 6LH, England
[3] Soochow Univ, Sch Nursing, Suzhou 215006, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Greenwich, Sch Sci, Medway Campus,Cent Ave, Chatham ME4 4TB, Kent, England
[5] Birmingham City Univ, Fac Hlth Educ & Life Sci, Ravensbury House,City South Campus, Birmingham B15 3TN, W Midlands, England
[6] Coventry Univ, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Hlth, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Ctr Healthcare Res, Priory St, Coventry CV1 5FB, W Midlands, England
关键词
COVID-19; enteral nutrition; early enteral nutrition; delayed enteral nutrition; parenteral nutrition; gastrointestinal intolerance; mortality; length of hospital stay; days on mechanical ventilation;
D O I
10.3390/nu14051120
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: Patients who are critically ill with COVID-19 could have impaired nutrient absorption due to disruption of the normal intestinal mucosa. They are often in a state of high inflammation, increased stress and catabolism as well as a significant increase in energy and protein requirements. Therefore, timely enteral nutrition support and the provision of optimal nutrients are essential in preventing malnutrition in these patients. Aim: This review aims to evaluate the effects of enteral nutrition in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Method: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-Analysis framework and PICO. Searches were conducted in databases, including EMBASE, Health Research databases and Google Scholar. Searches were conducted from database inception until 3 February 2022. The reference lists of articles were also searched for relevant articles. Results: Seven articles were included in the systematic review, and four articles were included in the meta-analysis. Two distinct areas were identified from the results of the systematic review and meta-analysis: the impact of enteral nutrition and gastrointestinal intolerance associated with enteral nutrition. The impact of enteral nutrition was further sub-divided into early enteral nutrition versus delayed enteral nutrition and enteral nutrition versus parenteral nutrition. The results of the meta-analysis of the effects of enteral nutrition in critically ill patients with COVID-19 showed that, overall, enteral nutrition was effective in significantly reducing the risk of mortality in these patients compared with the control with a risk ratio of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79, 0.99, p = 0.04). Following sub-group analysis, the early enteral nutrition group also showed a significant reduction in the risk of mortality with a risk ratio of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79, 1.00, p = 0.05). The Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) of mortality in patients with COVID-19 by early enteral nutrition was 11%. There was a significant reduction in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in the early enteral nutrition group compared with the delayed enteral nutrition group. There was no significant difference between enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition in relation to mortality (RR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.59, 1.28, p = 0.48). Concerning the length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay and days on mechanical ventilation, while there were reductions in the number of days in the enteral nutrition group compared to the control (delayed enteral nutrition or parenteral nutrition), the differences were not significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The results showed that early enteral nutrition significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the risk of mortality among critically ill patients with COVID-19. However, early enteral nutrition or enteral nutrition did not significantly (p > 0.05) reduce the length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay and days on mechanical ventilation compared to delayed enteral nutrition or parenteral nutrition. More studies are needed to examine the effect of early enteral nutrition in patients with COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Venous thromboembolism in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Syed Shahzad Hasan
    Sam Radford
    Chia Siang Kow
    Syed Tabish Razi Zaidi
    Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2020, 50 : 814 - 821
  • [32] Bolus Versus Continuous Enteral Feeding for Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Abdelbaky, Ahmed M.
    Elmasry, Wael G.
    Awad, Ahmed H.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [33] Safety and tolerance of enteral nutrition in COVID-19 critically ill patients, a retrospective study
    Osuna-Padilla, Ivan
    Carolina Rodriguez-Moguel, Nadia
    Aguilar-Vargas, Adriana
    Rodriguez-Llamazares, Sebastian
    CLINICAL NUTRITION ESPEN, 2021, 43 : 495 - 500
  • [34] Multidisciplinary Approach for Implementation of Early Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients
    Lopez, Frank
    Reddy, Amulya
    Campbell, Nathan
    Sayegh, Ghassan
    Sciarra, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 115 : S1443 - S1443
  • [35] Mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients with fungal infections: a comprehensive systematic review and meta -analysis
    Krzych, Lukasz J.
    Putowski, Zbigniew
    Gruca, Karol
    Pluta, Michal P.
    POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE-POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ, 2022, 132 (05):
  • [36] Effect of enteral immunomodulatory nutrition formula on mortality and critical care parameters in critically ill patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis
    Malekahmadi, Mahsa
    Pahlavani, Naseh
    Firouzi, Safieh
    Clayton, Zachary S.
    Islam, Sheikh Mohammed Shariful
    Rezaei Zonooz, Sanaz
    Moradi Moghaddam, Omid
    Soltani, Sepideh
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 27 (06) : 838 - 848
  • [37] Clinical efficacy of enteral nutrition feeding modalities in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wu, Jheng-Yan
    Liu, Mei-Yuan
    Liu, Ting-Hui
    Kuo, Chia-Yin
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    Tsai, Ya-Wen
    Lai, Chih-Cheng
    Hsu, Wan-Hsuan
    Chuang, Min-Hsiang
    Huang, Po-Yu
    Tay, Hung-Tze
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2023, 77 (11) : 1026 - 1033
  • [38] The efficacy and safety of prokinetic agents in critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Kim Lewis
    Zuhoor Alqahtani
    Lauralyn Mcintyre
    Saleh Almenawer
    Fayez Alshamsi
    Andrew Rhodes
    Laura Evans
    Derek C. Angus
    Waleed Alhazzani
    Critical Care, 20
  • [39] Clinical efficacy of enteral nutrition feeding modalities in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Jheng-Yan Wu
    Mei-Yuan Liu
    Ting-Hui Liu
    Chia-Yin Kuo
    Kuo-Chuan Hung
    Ya-Wen Tsai
    Chih-Cheng Lai
    Wan-Hsuan Hsu
    Min-Hsiang Chuang
    Po-Yu Huang
    Hung-Tze Tay
    European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2023, 77 : 1026 - 1033
  • [40] The efficacy and safety of prokinetic agents in critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Lewis, Kim
    Alqahtani, Zuhoor
    Mcintyre, Lauralyn
    Almenawer, Saleh
    Alshamsi, Fayez
    Rhodes, Andrew
    Evans, Laura
    Angus, Derek C.
    Alhazzani, Waleed
    CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 20