Optimal switching policy between driving entities in semi-autonomous vehicles

被引:16
|
作者
van Wyk, Franco [1 ]
Khojandi, Anahita [1 ]
Masoud, Neda [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Control authority; Semi-autonomous vehicles; Markov decision process; Partial information; Safety; Intelligent transportation; ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL; AUTOMATION; TRANSITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.trc.2020.02.011
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
In the future, autonomous vehicles are expected to safely move people and cargo around. However, as of now, automated entities do not necessarily outperform human drivers under all circumstances, particularly under certain road and environmental factors such as bright light, heavy rain, poor quality of road and traffic signs, etc. Therefore, in certain conditions it is safer for the driver to take over the control of the vehicle. However, switching control back and forth between the human driver and the automated driving entity may itself pose a short-term, elevated risk, particularly because of the out of the loop (OOTL) issue for humans. In this study, we develop a mathematical framework to determine the optimal driving-entity switching policy between the automated driving entity and the human driver. Specifically, we develop a Markov decision process (MDP) model to prescribe the entity in charge to minimize the expected safety cost of a trip, considering the dynamic changes of the road/environment during the trip. In addition, we develop a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) model to accommodate the fact that the risk posed by the immediate road/environment may only be partially observed. We conduct extensive numerical experiments and thorough sensitivity and robustness analyses, where we also compare the expected safety cost of trips under the optimal and single driving entity policies. In addition, we quantify the risks associated with the policies, as well as the impact of miss-estimating road/environment condition risk level by the driving entities, and provide insights. The proposed frameworks can be used as a policy tool to identify factors that can render a region suitable for level four autonomy.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 531
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MaDSAV: Maintaining Driving Skills in Semi-Autonomous Vehicles
    Meschtscherjakov, Alexander
    Tscheligi, Manfred
    McCall, Rod
    Louveton, Nicolas
    Engel, Thomas
    Koenig, Vincent
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMOTIVE USER INTERFACES AND INTERACTIVE VEHICULAR APPLICATIONS (AUTOMOTIVE UI '15), 2015, : 136 - 139
  • [2] An Algorithm for Supervised Driving of Cooperative Semi-Autonomous Vehicles
    Altche, Florent
    Qian, Xiangjun
    de La Fortelle, Arnaud
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2017, 18 (12) : 3527 - 3539
  • [3] Optimal Velocity Profile Generation for Semi-Autonomous Vehicles
    Winter, Christoph
    de Castro, Ricardo
    AUTOREG 2017: AUTOMATISIERTES FAHREN UND VERNETZTE MOBILITAT, 2017, 2292 : 129 - 141
  • [4] Designing for Enhancing Situational Awareness of Semi-Autonomous Driving Vehicles
    Wang, Chao
    van de Star, Sietze
    Sudhakaran, Adityen
    Steeghs, Sander
    Chakraborty, Debayan
    Gorle, Archita
    Dey, Debargha
    Terken, Jacques
    Hu, Jun
    AUTOMOTIVEUI'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMOTIVE USER INTERFACES AND INTERACTIVE VEHICULAR APPLICATIONS, 2017, : 228 - 229
  • [5] Human-Machine Interaction in Driving Assistant Systems for Semi-Autonomous Driving Vehicles
    Lee, Heung-Gu
    Kang, Dong-Hyun
    Kim, Deok-Hwan
    ELECTRONICS, 2021, 10 (19)
  • [6] Evaluation of Semi-Autonomous Convoy Driving
    Davis, James
    Animashaun, Asisat
    Schoenherr, Edward
    McDowell, Kaleb
    JOURNAL OF FIELD ROBOTICS, 2008, 25 (11-12) : 880 - 897
  • [7] Formal Methods for Semi-Autonomous Driving
    Seshia, Sanjit A.
    Sadigh, Dorsa
    Sastry, S. Shankar
    2015 52ND ACM/EDAC/IEEE DESIGN AUTOMATION CONFERENCE (DAC), 2015,
  • [8] Non-optimal Semi-autonomous Agent Behavior Policy Recognition
    Lelerre, Mathieu
    Mouaddib, Abdel-Illah
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 1: ECTA, 2016, : 193 - 200
  • [9] Gaze-based Intention Anticipation over Driving Manoeuvres in Semi-Autonomous Vehicles
    Wu, Min
    Louw, Tyron
    Lahijanian, Morteza
    Ruan, Wenjie
    Huang, Xiaowei
    Merat, Natasha
    Kwiatkowska, Marta
    2019 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS), 2019, : 6210 - 6216
  • [10] Intelligent semi-autonomous vehicles in materials handling
    Moore, P
    Pu, JS
    Lundgren, JO
    Ujvari, S
    MECHATRONICS '98, 1998, : 311 - 316