共 50 条
Reducing Frequent Visits to the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review of Interventions
被引:164
|作者:
Soril, Lesley J. J.
[1
,2
]
Leggett, Laura E.
[1
,2
]
Lorenzetti, Diane L.
[1
,3
]
Noseworthy, Tom W.
[1
,2
]
Clement, Fiona M.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Inst Publ Hlth, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Inst Hlth Econ, Edmonton, AB, Canada
来源:
PLOS ONE
|
2015年
/
10卷
/
04期
关键词:
CLINICAL CASE-MANAGEMENT;
INAPPROPRIATE ATTENDERS;
USERS;
CARE;
ACCIDENT;
PROGRAM;
ACCESS;
D O I:
10.1371/journal.pone.0123660
中图分类号:
O [数理科学和化学];
P [天文学、地球科学];
Q [生物科学];
N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号:
07 ;
0710 ;
09 ;
摘要:
Objective The objective of this study was to establish the effectiveness of interventions to reduce frequent emergency department (ED) use among a general adult high ED-use population. Methods Systematic review of the literature from 1950-January 2015. Studies were included if they: had a control group (controlled trials or comparative cohort studies), were set in an ED or acute care facility, and examined the impact of an intervention to reduce frequent ED use in a general adult population. Studies reporting non-original data or focused on a specific patient population were excluded. Study design, patient population, intervention, the frequency of ED visits, and costs of frequent ED use and/or interventions were extracted and narratively synthesized. Results Among 17 included articles, three intervention categories were identified: case management (n = 12), individualized care plans (n = 3), and information sharing (n = 2). Ten studies examining case management reported reductions in mean (-0.66 to -37) or median (-0.1 to -20) number of ED visits after 12-months; one study reported an increase in mean ED visits (+2.79); and one reported no change. Of these, 6 studies also reported reduced hospital costs. Only 1 study evaluating individualized care plans examined ED utilization and found no change in median ED visits post-intervention. Costs following individualized care plans were also only evaluated in 1 study, which reported savings in hospital costs of $742/patient. Evidence was mixed regarding information sharing: 1 study reported no change in mean ED visits and did not examine costs; whereas the other reported a decrease in mean ED visits (-16.9) and ED cost savings of $15,513/patient. Conclusions The impact of all three frequent-user interventions was modest. Case management had the most rigorous evidence base, yielded moderate cost savings, but with variable reductions in ED use. Future studies evaluating non-traditional interventions, tailoring to patient subgroups or socio-cultural contexts, are warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文