Monitoring of sugar beet growth indicators using wide-dynamic-range vegetation index (WDRVI) derived from UAV multispectral images

被引:53
作者
Cao, Yang [1 ]
Li, Guo Long [1 ]
Luo, Yuan Kai [1 ]
Pan, Qi [1 ]
Zhang, Shao Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Inner Mongolia Agr Univ, Sugar Beet Physiol Res Inst, Hohhot 010010, Peoples R China
关键词
Sugar beet; UAV; WDRVI; NDVI; Monitoring; REMOTE ESTIMATION; LEAF-AREA; NITROGEN; FIELD; REFLECTANCE; MAIZE; WHEAT; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.compag.2020.105331
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The normalized vegetation index (NDVI) is widely used to monitor the spatial, temporal, physiological, and biophysical characteristics of vegetation. However, if the ground biomass is high, the NDVI becomes rapidly saturated. In the leaf area index (LAI) range of 2 to 6, reflectance in the near-infrared band is significantly higher than that in the red band. When reflectance in the near-infrared band exceeds 40%, the contribution of that reflectance to the NDVI is low. Here, we applied a weight coefficient, alpha (range 0.05 to 0.5), to the near-infrared band, thus developing a wide-dynamic-range vegetation index (WDRVI). We calculated (alpha * NIR-RED)/(alpha * NIR + RED) values; these emphasized the Fresh Weight of Beet LAI, the Fresh Weight of Leaves (FWL), and the Fresh Weight of Roots (FWR). We sought a vegetation index that optimally monitored early-stage sugar beet growth. The WDRVI sensitivities using various a coefficients were higher than those of the NDVI in the LAI range of 2 to 6. The determination coefficients (r(2) values) of the sugar beet LAI, FWL, and FWT models established using the WDRVI1 were 0.957, 0.950, and 0.963, respectively. Using the WDRVI1 index model to estimate the accuracy of beet growth indicators can improve 1.05% to 5.07%. Use of the WDRVI reduces beet growth indicator saturation when the ground biomass is high, enhancing the accuracy of growth monitoring. This is useful as the sugar beet has huge ground biomass.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Citrus rootstock evaluation utilizing UAV-based remote sensing and artificial intelligence
    Arnpatzidis, Yiannis
    Partel, Victor
    Meyering, Bo
    Albrecht, Ute
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2019, 164
  • [2] ESTIMATING ABSORBED PHOTOSYNTHETIC RADIATION AND LEAF-AREA INDEX FROM SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE IN WHEAT
    ASRAR, G
    FUCHS, M
    KANEMASU, ET
    HATFIELD, JL
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1984, 76 (02) : 300 - 306
  • [3] QuickBird satellite versus ground-based multi-spectral data for estimating nitrogen status of irrigated maize
    Bausch, W. C.
    Khosla, R.
    [J]. PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2010, 11 (03) : 274 - 290
  • [4] Bausch W.C., 2003, GROUND BASED SENSING
  • [5] [陈江鲁 CHEN Jianglu], 2011, [棉花学报, Cotton Science], V23, P265
  • [6] High-Throughput Biomass Estimation in Rice Crops Using UAV Multispectral Imagery
    Devia, Carlos A.
    Rojas, Juan P.
    Petro, E.
    Martinez, Carol
    Mondragon, Ivan F.
    Patino, D.
    Rebolledo, M. C.
    Colorado, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, 2019, 96 (3-4) : 573 - 589
  • [7] Remote estimation of rice LAI based on Fourier spectrum texture from UAV image
    Duan, Bo
    Liu, Yating
    Gong, Yan
    Peng, Yi
    Wu, Xianting
    Zhu, Renshan
    Fang, Shenghui
    [J]. PLANT METHODS, 2019, 15 (01)
  • [8] Quantifying vegetation change in semiarid environments: Precision and accuracy of spectral mixture analysis and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
    Elmore, AJ
    Mustard, JF
    Manning, SJ
    Lobell, DB
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 73 (01) : 87 - 102
  • [9] Validation of agronomic UAV and field measurements for tomato varieties
    Enciso, Juan
    Avila, Carlos A.
    Jung, Jinha
    Elsayed-Farag, Sheren
    Chang, Anjin
    Yeom, Junho
    Landivar, Juan
    Maeda, Murilo
    Chavez, Jose C.
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2019, 158 : 278 - 283
  • [10] Use of a green channel in remote sensing of global vegetation from EOS-MODIS
    Gitelson, AA
    Kaufman, YJ
    Merzlyak, MN
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 58 (03) : 289 - 298