Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma: Long-term Outcomes, Prognostic Value, Accuracy, and Safety

被引:11
|
作者
Hanks, John E. [1 ]
Kovatch, Kevin J. [1 ]
Ali, S. Ahmed [1 ]
Roberts, Emily [4 ]
Durham, Alison B. [2 ]
Smith, Joshua D. [1 ]
Bradford, Carol R. [1 ,3 ]
Malloy, Kelly M. [1 ]
Boonstra, Philip S. [4 ]
Lao, Christopher D. [5 ]
McLean, Scott A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Dermatol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Med Sch, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Michigan Med, Dept Med Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
melanoma; head and neck; sentinel lymph node biopsy; false omission; otolaryngology; cutaneous; AMERICAN JOINT COMMITTEE; EARLY-STAGE MELANOMA; CUTANEOUS HEAD; FOLLOW-UP; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; METASTATIC MELANOMA; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; RISK-FACTORS; RECURRENCE; DISSECTION;
D O I
10.1177/0194599819899934
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the long-term outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for head and neck cutaneous melanoma (HNCM). Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Tertiary academic medical center. Subjects and Methods Longitudinal review of a 356-patient cohort with HNCM undergoing SLNB from 1997 to 2007. Results Descriptive characteristics included the following: age, 53.5 +/- 19 years (mean +/- SD); sex, 26.8% female; median follow-up, 4.9 years; and Breslow depth, 2.52 +/- 1.87 mm. Overall, 75 (21.1%) patients had a positive SLNB. Among patients undergoing completion lymph node dissection following positive SLNB, 20 (27.4%) had at least 1 additional positive nonsentinel lymph node. Eighteen patients with local control and negative SLNB developed regional disease, indicating a false omission rate of 6.4%, including 10 recurrences in previously unsampled basins. Ten-year overall survival (OS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were significantly greater in the negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) cohort (OS, 61% [95% CI, 0.549-0.677]; MSS, 81.9% [95% CI, 0.769-0.873]) than the positive SLN cohort (OS, 31% [95% CI, 0.162-0.677]; MSS, 60.3% [95% CI, 0.464-0.785]) and positive SLN/positive nonsentinel lymph node cohort (OS, 8.4% [95% CI, 0.015-0.474]; MSS, 9.6% [95% CI, 0.017-0.536]). OS was significantly associated with SLN positivity (hazard ratio [HR], 2.39; P < .01), immunosuppression (HR, 2.37; P < .01), angiolymphatic invasion (HR, 1.91; P < .01), and ulceration (HR, 1.86; P < .01). SLN positivity (HR, 3.13; P < .01), angiolymphatic invasion (HR, 3.19; P < .01), and number of mitoses (P = .0002) were significantly associated with MSS. Immunosuppression (HR, 3.01; P < .01) and SLN status (HR, 2.84; P < .01) were associated with recurrence-free survival, and immunosuppression was the only factor significantly associated with regional recurrence (HR, 6.59; P < .01). Conclusions Long-term follow up indicates that SLNB showcases durable accuracy, safety, and prognostic importance for cutaneous HNCM.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 529
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy the Standard of Care for Cutaneous Head and Neck Melanoma?
    Schmalbach, Cecelia E.
    Bradford, Carol R.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2015, 125 (01) : 153 - 160
  • [32] The accuracy of head and neck carcinoma sentinel lymph node biopsy in the clinically NO neck
    Shoaib, T
    Soutar, DS
    MacDonald, DG
    Camilleri, IG
    Dunaway, DJ
    Gray, HW
    McCurrach, GM
    Bessent, RG
    MacLeod, TIF
    Robertson, AG
    CANCER, 2001, 91 (11) : 2077 - 2083
  • [33] Prognostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy according to Breslow thickness for cutaneous melanoma
    Stiegel, Evan
    Xiong, David
    Ya, Jason
    Funchain, Pauline
    Isakov, Raymond
    Gastman, Brian
    Vij, Alok
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 78 (05) : 942 - 948
  • [34] RF-Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma
    Montero-Vilchez, T.
    Martinez-Lopez, A.
    Salvador-Rodriguez, L.
    Arias-Santiago, S.
    ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS, 2020, 111 (10): : 870 - 871
  • [35] Analysis of regional recurrence after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy for head and neck melanoma
    McDonald, Kelly
    Page, Andrew J.
    Jordan, Sumanas W.
    Chu, Carrie
    Hestley, Andrea
    Delman, Keith A.
    Murray, Douglas R.
    Carlson, Grant W.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2013, 35 (05): : 667 - 671
  • [36] Sentinel node biopsy for melanoma in the head and neck region
    Jansen, L
    Koops, HS
    Nieweg, OE
    Doting, MHE
    Kapteijn, BAE
    Balm, AJM
    Vermey, A
    Plukker, JT
    Hoefnagel, CA
    Piers, DA
    Kroon, BBR
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2000, 22 (01): : 27 - 33
  • [37] Sentinel node biopsy for head cutaneous melanoma in the head and neck
    Medina-Franco, H
    Beenken, SW
    Heslin, MJ
    Urist, MM
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 8 (09) : 716 - 719
  • [38] Sentinel Node Biopsy for Cutaneous Melanoma in the Head and Neck
    Heriberto Medina-Franco
    Samuel W. Beenken
    Martin J. Heslin
    Marshall M. Urist
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2001, 8 : 716 - 719
  • [39] Recurrence of cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy
    Davis-Malesevich, Melinda V.
    Goepfert, Ryan
    Kubik, Mark
    Roberts, Dianna B.
    Myers, Jeffrey N.
    Kupferman, Michael E.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2015, 37 (08): : 1116 - 1121
  • [40] Long-term survival data on sentinel lymph node biopsy in anorectal melanoma
    D. C. Damin
    M. A. Rosito
    B. L. Spiro
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2010, 14 : 367 - 368