Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma: Long-term Outcomes, Prognostic Value, Accuracy, and Safety

被引:11
|
作者
Hanks, John E. [1 ]
Kovatch, Kevin J. [1 ]
Ali, S. Ahmed [1 ]
Roberts, Emily [4 ]
Durham, Alison B. [2 ]
Smith, Joshua D. [1 ]
Bradford, Carol R. [1 ,3 ]
Malloy, Kelly M. [1 ]
Boonstra, Philip S. [4 ]
Lao, Christopher D. [5 ]
McLean, Scott A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Dermatol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Med Sch, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Michigan Med, Dept Med Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
melanoma; head and neck; sentinel lymph node biopsy; false omission; otolaryngology; cutaneous; AMERICAN JOINT COMMITTEE; EARLY-STAGE MELANOMA; CUTANEOUS HEAD; FOLLOW-UP; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; METASTATIC MELANOMA; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; RISK-FACTORS; RECURRENCE; DISSECTION;
D O I
10.1177/0194599819899934
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the long-term outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for head and neck cutaneous melanoma (HNCM). Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Tertiary academic medical center. Subjects and Methods Longitudinal review of a 356-patient cohort with HNCM undergoing SLNB from 1997 to 2007. Results Descriptive characteristics included the following: age, 53.5 +/- 19 years (mean +/- SD); sex, 26.8% female; median follow-up, 4.9 years; and Breslow depth, 2.52 +/- 1.87 mm. Overall, 75 (21.1%) patients had a positive SLNB. Among patients undergoing completion lymph node dissection following positive SLNB, 20 (27.4%) had at least 1 additional positive nonsentinel lymph node. Eighteen patients with local control and negative SLNB developed regional disease, indicating a false omission rate of 6.4%, including 10 recurrences in previously unsampled basins. Ten-year overall survival (OS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were significantly greater in the negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) cohort (OS, 61% [95% CI, 0.549-0.677]; MSS, 81.9% [95% CI, 0.769-0.873]) than the positive SLN cohort (OS, 31% [95% CI, 0.162-0.677]; MSS, 60.3% [95% CI, 0.464-0.785]) and positive SLN/positive nonsentinel lymph node cohort (OS, 8.4% [95% CI, 0.015-0.474]; MSS, 9.6% [95% CI, 0.017-0.536]). OS was significantly associated with SLN positivity (hazard ratio [HR], 2.39; P < .01), immunosuppression (HR, 2.37; P < .01), angiolymphatic invasion (HR, 1.91; P < .01), and ulceration (HR, 1.86; P < .01). SLN positivity (HR, 3.13; P < .01), angiolymphatic invasion (HR, 3.19; P < .01), and number of mitoses (P = .0002) were significantly associated with MSS. Immunosuppression (HR, 3.01; P < .01) and SLN status (HR, 2.84; P < .01) were associated with recurrence-free survival, and immunosuppression was the only factor significantly associated with regional recurrence (HR, 6.59; P < .01). Conclusions Long-term follow up indicates that SLNB showcases durable accuracy, safety, and prognostic importance for cutaneous HNCM.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 529
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The long-term results and prognostic significance of cutaneous melanoma surgery using sentinel node biopsy with triple technique
    Rutkowski, Piotr
    Szydlowski, Konrad
    Nowecki, Zbigniew I.
    Salamacha, Maciej
    Goryn, Tomasz
    Mitrega-Korab, Beata
    Pienkowski, Andrzej
    Dziewirski, Wirginiusz
    Zdzienicki, Marcin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 13
  • [22] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck oncology
    Moya-Plana, Antoine
    Guerlain, Joanne
    Casiraghi, Odile
    Bidault, Francois
    Grimaldi, Serena
    Breuskin, Ingrid
    Gorphe, Philippe
    Temam, Stephane
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2020, 107 (06) : 653 - 659
  • [23] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous head and neck melanoma
    D. Evrard
    E. Routier
    C. Mateus
    G. Tomasic
    J. Lombroso
    F. Kolb
    C. Robert
    A. Moya-Plana
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2018, 275 : 1271 - 1279
  • [24] Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Malignant Melanoma of the Head and Neck: A Single Center Experience
    Rubatto, Marco
    Picciotto, Franco
    Moirano, Giovenale
    Fruttero, Enrico
    Caliendo, Virginia
    Borriello, Silvia
    Sciamarrelli, Nadia
    Fava, Paolo
    Senetta, Rebecca
    Lesca, Adriana
    Sapino, Anna
    Deandreis, Desiree
    Ribero, Simone
    Quaglino, Pietro
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (02)
  • [25] Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Cutaneous Head and Neck Melanoma: Mapping the Parotid Gland
    Picon, Antonio I.
    Coit, Daniel G.
    Shaha, Ashok R.
    Brady, Mary S.
    Boyle, Jay O.
    Singh, Bhuvanesh B.
    Wong, Richard J.
    Busam, Klaus J.
    Shah, Jatin P.
    Kraus, Dennis H.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 : 9001 - 9009
  • [26] Role of SPECT-CT in sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients diagnosed with head and neck melanoma
    Lopez-Rodriguez, E.
    Garcia-Gomez, F. J.
    Alvarez-Perez, R. M.
    Martinez-Castillo, R.
    Borrego-Dorado, I.
    Fernandez-Ortega, P.
    Zulueta-Dorado, T.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE MEDICINA NUCLEAR E IMAGEN MOLECULAR, 2016, 35 (01): : 22 - 28
  • [27] Sentinel lymph node biopsy:: a new perspective in head and neck mucosal melanoma?
    Starek, Ivo
    Koranda, Pavel
    Benes, Petr
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2006, 16 (05) : 423 - 427
  • [28] False-Negative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma
    Miller, Matthew W.
    Vetto, John T.
    Monroe, Marcus M.
    Weerasinghe, Roshanthi
    Andersen, Peter E.
    Gross, Neil D.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2011, 145 (04) : 606 - 611
  • [29] The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Management of Head and Neck Desmoplastic Melanoma
    A. Mohebati
    I. Ganly
    K. J. Busam
    D. Coit
    D. H. Kraus
    J. P. Shah
    S. G. Patel
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2012, 19 : 4307 - 4313
  • [30] The long-term prognostic impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma: a prospective study with 10-year follow-up
    Portinari, Mattia
    Baldini, Gabriele
    Guidoboni, Massimo
    Borghi, Alessandro
    Panareo, Stefano
    Bonazza, Simona
    Dionigi, Gianlorenzo
    Carcoforo, Paolo
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2018, 95 (05) : 286 - 296