Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma: Long-term Outcomes, Prognostic Value, Accuracy, and Safety

被引:11
作者
Hanks, John E. [1 ]
Kovatch, Kevin J. [1 ]
Ali, S. Ahmed [1 ]
Roberts, Emily [4 ]
Durham, Alison B. [2 ]
Smith, Joshua D. [1 ]
Bradford, Carol R. [1 ,3 ]
Malloy, Kelly M. [1 ]
Boonstra, Philip S. [4 ]
Lao, Christopher D. [5 ]
McLean, Scott A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Dermatol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Med Sch, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Michigan Med, Dept Med Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
melanoma; head and neck; sentinel lymph node biopsy; false omission; otolaryngology; cutaneous; AMERICAN JOINT COMMITTEE; EARLY-STAGE MELANOMA; CUTANEOUS HEAD; FOLLOW-UP; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; METASTATIC MELANOMA; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; RISK-FACTORS; RECURRENCE; DISSECTION;
D O I
10.1177/0194599819899934
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the long-term outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for head and neck cutaneous melanoma (HNCM). Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Tertiary academic medical center. Subjects and Methods Longitudinal review of a 356-patient cohort with HNCM undergoing SLNB from 1997 to 2007. Results Descriptive characteristics included the following: age, 53.5 +/- 19 years (mean +/- SD); sex, 26.8% female; median follow-up, 4.9 years; and Breslow depth, 2.52 +/- 1.87 mm. Overall, 75 (21.1%) patients had a positive SLNB. Among patients undergoing completion lymph node dissection following positive SLNB, 20 (27.4%) had at least 1 additional positive nonsentinel lymph node. Eighteen patients with local control and negative SLNB developed regional disease, indicating a false omission rate of 6.4%, including 10 recurrences in previously unsampled basins. Ten-year overall survival (OS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were significantly greater in the negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) cohort (OS, 61% [95% CI, 0.549-0.677]; MSS, 81.9% [95% CI, 0.769-0.873]) than the positive SLN cohort (OS, 31% [95% CI, 0.162-0.677]; MSS, 60.3% [95% CI, 0.464-0.785]) and positive SLN/positive nonsentinel lymph node cohort (OS, 8.4% [95% CI, 0.015-0.474]; MSS, 9.6% [95% CI, 0.017-0.536]). OS was significantly associated with SLN positivity (hazard ratio [HR], 2.39; P < .01), immunosuppression (HR, 2.37; P < .01), angiolymphatic invasion (HR, 1.91; P < .01), and ulceration (HR, 1.86; P < .01). SLN positivity (HR, 3.13; P < .01), angiolymphatic invasion (HR, 3.19; P < .01), and number of mitoses (P = .0002) were significantly associated with MSS. Immunosuppression (HR, 3.01; P < .01) and SLN status (HR, 2.84; P < .01) were associated with recurrence-free survival, and immunosuppression was the only factor significantly associated with regional recurrence (HR, 6.59; P < .01). Conclusions Long-term follow up indicates that SLNB showcases durable accuracy, safety, and prognostic importance for cutaneous HNCM.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 529
页数:10
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system [J].
Balch, CM ;
Soong, SJ ;
Gershenwald, JE ;
Thompson, JF ;
Reintgen, DS ;
Cascinelli, N ;
Urist, M ;
McMasters, KM ;
Ross, MI ;
Kirkwood, JM ;
Atkins, MB ;
Thompson, JA ;
Coit, DG ;
Byrd, D ;
Desmond, R ;
Zhang, YT ;
Liu, PY ;
Lyman, GH ;
Morabito, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (16) :3622-3634
[2]   Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma [J].
Balch, CM ;
Buzaid, AC ;
Soong, SJ ;
Atkins, MB ;
Cascinelli, N ;
Coit, DG ;
Fleming, ID ;
Gershenwald, JE ;
Houghton, A ;
Kirkwood, JM ;
McMasters, KM ;
Mihm, MF ;
Morton, DL ;
Reintgen, DS ;
Ross, MI ;
Sober, A ;
Thompson, JA ;
Thompson, JF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (16) :3635-3648
[3]   Regional recurrence after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma [J].
Carlson, Grant W. ;
Page, Andrew J. ;
Cohen, Cynthia ;
Parker, Douglas ;
Yaar, Ron ;
Li, Anya ;
Hestley, Andrea ;
Delman, Keith A. ;
Murray, Douglas R. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 248 (03) :378-385
[4]   Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of cutaneous head and neck melanoma [J].
Carlson, GW ;
Murray, DR ;
Lyles, RH ;
Hestley, A ;
Cohen, C .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 115 (03) :721-728
[5]   Nivolumab and ipilimumab: immunotherapy for treatment of malignant melanoma [J].
Carreau, Nicole A. ;
Pavlick, Anna C. .
FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2019, 15 (04) :349-358
[6]   Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous melanoma: The WHO Melanoma Program experience [J].
Cascinelli, N ;
Belli, F ;
Santinami, M ;
Fait, V ;
Testori, A ;
Ruka, W ;
Cavaliere, R ;
Mozzillo, N ;
Rossi, CR ;
MacKie, RM ;
Nieweg, O ;
Pace, M ;
Kirov, K .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 7 (06) :469-474
[7]   Sentinel and nonsentinel node status in stage IB and II melanoma patients: Two-step prognostic indicators of survival [J].
Cascinelli, Natale ;
Bombardieri, Emilio ;
Bufalino, Rosaria ;
Camerini, Tiziana ;
Carbone, Antonino ;
Clemente, Claudio ;
Lenisa, Leonardo ;
Mascheroni, Luigi ;
Maurichi, Andrea ;
Pennacchioli, Elisabetta ;
Patuzzo, Roberto ;
Santinami, Mario ;
Tragni, Gabrina .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (27) :4464-4471
[8]   Sentinel lymph node biopsy for head and neck melanomas [J].
Chao, C ;
Wong, SL ;
Edwards, MJ ;
Ross, MI ;
Reintgen, DS ;
Noyes, RD ;
Stadelmann, WK ;
Lentsch, E ;
McMasters, KM .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 10 (01) :21-26
[9]   Sentinel lymph node biopsy: Is it possible to reduce false negative rates by excluding patients with nodular melanoma? [J].
Corrigan, M. A. ;
Coffey, J. C. ;
O'Sullivan, M. J. ;
Fogarty, K. M. ;
Redmond, H. P. .
SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2006, 4 (03) :153-157
[10]   Sentinel Node Biopsy for Head and Neck Melanoma: A Systematic Review [J].
de Rosa, Nicole ;
Lyman, Gary H. ;
Silbermins, Damian ;
Valsecchi, Matias E. ;
Pruitt, Scott K. ;
Tyler, Douglas M. ;
Lee, Walter T. .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2011, 145 (03) :375-382