Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Malignant Small Bowel Obstruction A National Cohort Study

被引:4
|
作者
Song, Yun [1 ]
Metzger, Daniel Aryeh [1 ]
Bruce, Adrienne N. [1 ]
Krouse, Robert S. [1 ,2 ]
Roses, Robert E. [1 ]
Fraker, Douglas L. [1 ]
Kelz, Rachel R. [1 ]
Karakousis, Giorgos C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Corporal Michael J Crescenz Vet Affairs Med Ctr P, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
malignant small bowel obstruction; metastatic cancer; postoperative complications; postoperative mortality; prediction model; small bowel obstruction; RISK CALCULATOR; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY; CARCINOMATOSIS; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000003890
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The study objectives were to characterize surgical outcomes for malignant small bowel obstruction (MaSBO) as compared to other small bowel obstructions (SBO) and to develop a prediction model for postoperative mortality for MaSBO. Summary Background Data: MaSBO is a morbid complication of advanced cancers for which the optimal management remains undefined. Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for MaSBO or SBO were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005-2017). Outcomes [30-day morbidity, unplanned readmissions, mortality, postoperative length of stay (LOS)] were compared between propensity score-matched MaSBO and SBO patients. An internally validated prediction model for mortality in MaSBO patients was developed. Results: Of 46,706 patients, 1612 (3.5%) had MaSBO. Although MaSBO patients were younger than those with SBO (median 63 vs 65 years, P < 0.001), they were otherwise more clinically complex, including a higher proportion with recent weight loss (22.0% vs 4.0%, P < 0.001), severe hypoalbuminemia (18.6% vs 5.2%, P < 0.001), and cytopenias. After matching (N = 1609/group), MaSBO was associated with increased morbidity [odds ratio (OR) 1.2, P = 0.004], but not readmission (OR 1.1, P = 0.48) or LOS (incidence rate ratio 1.0, P = 0.14). The odds of mortality were significantly higher for MaSBO than SBO (OR 3.3, P < 0.001). A risk-score model predicted postoperative mortality for MaSBO with an optimism-adjusted Brier score of 0.114 and area under the curve of 0.735. Patients in the highest-risk category (11.5% of MaSBO population) had a predicted mortality rate of 39.4%. Conclusion: Surgery for MaSBO is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, necessitating careful patient evaluation before operative intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:e198 / e205
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Management of primary and metastatic malignant small bowel obstruction, operate or palliate. A systematic review
    Banting, Samuel P.
    Waters, Peadar S.
    Peacock, Oliver
    Narasimhan, Vignesh
    Lynch, Andrew C.
    McCormick, Jacob J.
    Warrier, Satish K.
    Heriot, Alexander G.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 91 (03) : 282 - 290
  • [22] Assessing outcomes in laparoscopic vs open surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction
    Chin, Ryan L.
    Lima, Diego L.
    Pereira, Xavier
    Romero-Velez, Gustavo
    Friedmann, Patricia
    Dawodu, Gbalekan
    Sterbenz, Kaitlin
    Yamada, Jaclyn
    Sreeramoju, Prashanth
    Smith, Vance
    Malcher, Flavio
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (02): : 1376 - 1383
  • [23] Abdominal Multidetector Computed Tomography for Suspected Small-Bowel Obstruction: Multireader Study Comparing Radiologist Performance for Predicting Surgical Outcomes
    Scrima, Andrew
    Lubner, Meghan G.
    King, Scott
    Kennedy, Gregory
    Pickhardt, Perry J.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2017, 41 (03) : 388 - 393
  • [24] Diabetes Mellitus in Patients Presenting with Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: Delaying Surgical Intervention Results in Worse Outcomes
    Karamanos, Efstathios
    Dulchavsky, Scott
    Beale, Elizabeth
    Inaba, Kenji
    Demetriades, Demetrios
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (04) : 863 - 869
  • [25] Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: a comparison of outcomes
    Byrne, James
    Saleh, Fady
    Ambrosini, Luciano
    Quereshy, Fayez
    Jackson, Timothy D.
    Okrainec, Allan
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (09): : 2525 - 2532
  • [26] Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of small bowel obstruction: an analysis of clinical outcomes
    Nordin, Ann
    Freedman, Jacob
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (10): : 4454 - 4463
  • [27] Contemporary National Surgical Outcomes in the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction
    Oberlin, Daniel T.
    McGuire, Barry B.
    Pilecki, Matthew
    Rambachan, Aksharananda
    Kim, John Y.
    Perry, Kent T.
    Nadler, Robert B.
    UROLOGY, 2015, 85 (02) : 363 - 367
  • [28] Small bowel obstruction: early parameters predicting the need for surgical intervention
    Isaksson, K.
    Weber, E.
    Andersson, R.
    Tingstedt, B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2011, 37 (02) : 155 - 159
  • [29] Assessing the Modified Frailty Index and Post-Operative Outcomes in Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Talwar, Gaurav
    Mckechnie, Tyler
    Patel, Janhavi
    Qiu, Reva
    Wu, Kathy
    Lee, Yung
    Hong, Dennis
    Doumouras, Aristithes
    Bogach, Jessica
    Eskicioglu, Cagla
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 297 : 71 - 82
  • [30] Early laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction: retrospective study of main advantages
    Mazzetti, Claudia Hannele
    Serinaldi, Francesco
    Lebrun, Eric
    Lemaitre, Jean
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (06): : 2781 - 2792