On the use of probabilistic and non-probabilistic super parametric hybrid models for time-variant reliability analysis

被引:15
|
作者
Meng, Zeng [1 ]
Guo, Liangbing [1 ]
Hao, Peng [2 ]
Liu, Zhaotao [1 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Univ Technol, Dept Engn Mech, State Key Lab Struct Anal Ind Equipment, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hybrid time-variant reliability; Super parametric non-probabilistic model; Out-crossing rate; RRIM; CONVEX MODEL; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2021.114113
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Due to having a large number of uncertain variables originating from various sources in time-variant reliability problem, the methods for taking account of these uncertainties are of high significance in engineering. In this study, a novel hybrid time-variant reliability model is established based on a probabilistic model and a super parametric convex model. The probabilistic and non-probabilistic parameters can be addressed simultaneously using this model. The stochastic processes are discretized using the expansion optimal linear estimation method to capture the correlation among different time nodes. In addition, the hybrid reliability iteration method is presented to obtain the upper and lower bounds of failure probability simultaneously. Subsequently, a new relaxed reliability iteration method is proposed to solve the hybrid time-variant reliability model. The relaxed method is adopted to ensure the robustness and efficiency of the proposed method. Three examples are discussed to demonstrate the validity and usage of the presented methodology. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A non-probabilistic time-variant method for structural reliability analysis
    Xin, Tengda
    Zhao, Jiguang
    Cui, Cunyan
    Duan, Yongsheng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART O-JOURNAL OF RISK AND RELIABILITY, 2020, 234 (05) : 664 - 675
  • [2] The Hybrid Probabilistic and Non-Probabilistic Model of Structural Reliability Analysis
    Fang, Pengya
    Chang, Xinlong
    Hu, Kuan
    Wang, Zhaoxia
    Long, Bing
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST SYMPOSIUM ON AVIATION MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT-VOL II, 2014, 297 : 237 - 244
  • [3] Structural design optimization based on hybrid time-variant reliability measure under non-probabilistic convex uncertainties
    Wang, Lei
    Ma, Yujia
    Yang, Yaowen
    Wang, Xiaojun
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2019, 69 : 330 - 354
  • [4] Hybrid probabilistic fuzzy and non-probabilistic reliability analysis on structural system
    Ni, Zao
    Qiu, Zhiping
    Nanjing Hangkong Hangtian Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010, 42 (03): : 272 - 277
  • [5] Time-variant reliability model and its measure index of structures based on a non-probabilistic interval process
    Lei Wang
    Xiaojun Wang
    Xiao Chen
    Ruixing Wang
    Acta Mechanica, 2015, 226 : 3221 - 3241
  • [6] Hybrid probabilistic fuzzy and non-probabilistic model of structural reliability
    Ni, Zao
    Qiu, Zhiping
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 58 (03) : 463 - 467
  • [7] Time-variant reliability model and its measure index of structures based on a non-probabilistic interval process
    Wang, Lei
    Wang, Xiaojun
    Chen, Xiao
    Wang, Ruixing
    ACTA MECHANICA, 2015, 226 (10) : 3221 - 3241
  • [8] Non-probabilistic time-variant reliability assessment (NTRA) for the active control of vibration systems with convex uncertainties
    Wang, Lei
    Wang, Xiaojun
    Wu, Di
    Zhang, Xiaoyu
    ISA TRANSACTIONS, 2018, 83 : 276 - 289
  • [9] A time-variant non-probabilistic reliability assessment strategy for laterally loaded offshore monopiles under scour and corrosion
    Jiang, Chong
    Guo, Shiyu
    Shao, Xiaodong
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2024, 310
  • [10] The interval estimation of reliability for probabilistic and non-probabilistic hybrid structural system
    Qiu, Zhiping
    Wang, Jun
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2010, 17 (05) : 1142 - 1154