What is the best time for psychosocial counselling from the perspective of cancer patients and their relatives? A multi-centre qualitative study

被引:6
|
作者
Singer, Susanne [1 ,2 ]
Kojima, Erika [1 ,2 ]
Deppisch, Larissa [1 ,2 ]
Taylor, Katherine [1 ,2 ]
Wickert, Martin [3 ]
Riedel, Petra [3 ]
Alt, Juergen [2 ]
Hess, Georg [2 ]
Hechtner, Marlene [1 ,2 ]
Bayer, Oliver [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med Ctr, Inst Med Biostat Epidemiol & Informat IMBEI, Div Epidemiol & Hlth Serv Res, Obere Zahlbacher Str 69, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
[2] Univ Canc Ctr Mainz UCT, Mainz, Germany
[3] Canc Counselling Ctr, Tubingen, Germany
关键词
counselling; gender; help-seeking; optimal time-point; preferences; timing; DECISION-MAKING; BREAST-CANCER; CARE; DEPRESSION; SERVICES; SUPPORT; DISTRESS; IMPACT; INTERVENTIONS; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1002/capr.12488
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Purpose The aim of this study was to identify at what time patients with cancer and their relatives want to be informed about and receive psychosocial counselling. Methods In a multi-centre prospective study, both users and non-users of psychosocial cancer counselling were asked to participate in a qualitative interview about their preferences for psychosocial counselling. A second interview was scheduled 3-6 months thereafter. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded according to content analysis. Results Altogether, 61 patients and 42 relatives participated, resulting in 183 interviews (103 at t1, 80 at t2). Most often, the optimal time-point for cancer counselling was defined by the participants according to the treatment trajectory, and the most frequently mentioned preferred time-point was 'as early as possible': at the time of cancer diagnosis (mentioned in 22% of interviews with men and 10% of interviews with women). In particular, men also said that they wanted psychosocial counselling while waiting for test results (5%), at the point of returning to work and/or when under the threat of unemployment (3%). Women especially preferred this support during therapy (4%) and 'when one has the capacity for it' (4%), in terms of time and emotional capacity. Conclusions Healthcare providers should inform their cancer patients and the relatives about the possibilities of professional psychosocial support early on in the disease trajectory (i.e. at the time of diagnosis) and repeatedly thereafter, especially in times of uncertainty, while ensuring the patients' capacity to process information at each time-point is taken into consideration.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 568
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What is the supporting role of health care providers from the perspective of patients with renal allograft rejection? A qualitative study
    Ebadzadeh, Mohammad Reza
    Nouhi, Esmat
    Farokhzadian, Jamileh
    Shahrbabaki, Parvin Mangolian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 34 (01) : 338 - 345
  • [32] AB0 blood groups and rhesus factor expression as prognostic parameters in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer - a retrospective multi-centre study
    Seebacher, Veronika
    Polterauer, Stephan
    Reinthaller, Alexander
    Koelbl, Heinz
    Achleitner, Regina
    Berger, Astrid
    Concin, Nicole
    BMC CANCER, 2018, 18
  • [33] The challenge of managing mild to moderate distress in patients with end stage renal disease: results from a multi-centre, mixed methods research study and the implications for renal service organisation
    Damery, Sarah
    Sein, Kim
    Nicholas, Johann
    Baharani, Jyoti
    Combes, Gill
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [34] Conversations on Cancer Chemotherapy Cessation in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Qualitative Findings From a Multi-Institutional Study
    Stout, Jeremiah
    Kumbamu, Ashok
    Tilburt, Jon
    Fernandez, Cara
    Geller, Gail
    Koenig, Barbara
    Lenz, Heinz-Josep
    Jatoi, Aminah
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 38 (02) : 175 - 179
  • [35] Prevalence of mental disorders, psychosocial distress, and perceived need for psychosocial support in cancer patients and their relatives stratified by biopsychosocial factors: rationale, study design, and methods of a prospective multi-center observational cohort study (LUPE study)
    Mehnert-Theuerkauf, Anja
    Hufeld, Julia Marie
    Esser, Peter
    Goerling, Ute
    Hermann, Myriel
    Zimmermann, Tanja
    Reuter, Hannah
    Ernst, Jochen
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [36] Supporting participation in paid work of cancer survivors and their partners in the Netherlands: protocol of the SusTained Employability in cancer Patients and their partnerS (STEPS) multi-centre randomized controlled trial and cohort study
    Zegers, Amber D.
    Coenen, Pieter
    Bultmann, Ute
    Retel, Valesca
    Kieffer, Jacobien M.
    Van der Beek, Allard J.
    Duijts, Saskia F. A.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [37] What do patients with prostate or breast cancer want from an Internet site? A qualitative study of information needs
    Rozmovits, L
    Ziebland, S
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2004, 53 (01) : 57 - 64
  • [38] Participation in adjuvant clinical breast cancer trials: Does study participation improve survival compared to guideline adherent adjuvant treatment? A retrospective multi-centre cohort study of 9433 patients
    Schwentner, L.
    Van Ewijk, R.
    Kurzeder, C.
    Hoffmann, I.
    Koenig, J.
    Kreienberg, R.
    Blettner, M.
    Woeckel, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 (03) : 553 - 563
  • [39] Fatalism and metaphor in Confucianism: A qualitative study of barriers to genetic testing among first-degree relatives of hereditary cancer patients from China
    Jiang, Chaonan
    Liu, Li
    Wang, Ye
    Wu, Liangzheng
    Zhang, Wenxia
    Wu, Xiaodan
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2023, 32 (02) : 275 - 282
  • [40] Two-Year Follow-Up of a Multi-centre Randomized Controlled Trial to Study Effectiveness of a Hospital-Based Work Support Intervention for Cancer Patients
    Tamminga, S. J.
    Verbeek, J. H. A. M.
    Bos, M. M. E. M.
    Fons, G.
    Kitzen, J. J. E. M.
    Plaisier, P. W.
    Frings-Dresen, M. H. W.
    de Boer, A. G. E. M.
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2019, 29 (04) : 701 - 710