In silico evaluation and optimisation of magnetic resonance elastography of the liver

被引:0
|
作者
McGrath, Deirdre M. [1 ,2 ]
Bradley, Christopher R. [1 ,2 ]
Francis, Susan T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Ctr, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Queens Med Ctr, NIHR Nottingham Biomed Res Ctr, Radiol Sci, Div Clin Neurosci, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
magnetic resonance elastography; simulation; finite element modelling; liver; fibrosis; cirrhosis; MR ELASTOGRAPHY; INVERSION ALGORITHMS; FIBROSIS; ACCURATE; BRAIN; ACQUISITION; MULTISCALE; PHANTOMS;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ac3263
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is widely adopted as a biomarker of liver fibrosis. However, in vivo MRE accuracy is difficult to assess. Approach. Finite element model (FEM) simulation was employed to evaluate liver MRE accuracy and inform methodological optimisation. MRE data was simulated in a 3D FEM of the human torso including the liver, and compared with spin-echo echo-planar imaging MRE acquisitions. The simulated MRE results were compared with the ground truth magnitude of the complex shear modulus ( divide G* divide ) for varying: (1) ground truth liver divide G* divide ; (2) simulated imaging resolution; (3) added noise; (4) data smoothing. Motion and strain-based signal-to-noise (SNR) metrics were evaluated on the simulated data as a means to select higher-quality voxels for preparation of acquired MRE summary statistics of divide G* divide . Main results. The simulated MRE accuracy for a given ground truth divide G* divide was found to be a function of imaging resolution, motion-SNR and smoothing. At typical imaging resolutions, it was found that due to under-sampling of the MRE wave-field, combined with motion-related noise, the reconstructed simulated divide G* divide could contain errors on the scale of the difference between liver fibrosis stages, e.g. 54% error for ground truth divide G* divide = 1 kPa. Optimum imaging resolutions were identified for given ground truth divide G* divide and motion-SNR levels. Significance. This study provides important knowledge on the accuracy and optimisation of liver MRE. For example, for motion-SNR <= 5, to distinguish between liver divide G* divide of 2 and 3 kPa (i.e. early-stage liver fibrosis) it was predicted that the optimum isotropic voxel size is 4-6 mm.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Transient Elastography for Liver Fibrosis and Steatosis Assessments in the Liver Transplant Setting
    Ellik, Zeynep Melekoglu
    Idilman, Ilkay S.
    Kartal, Aysun
    Balaban, Yasemin
    Elhan, Atilla H.
    Karcaaltincaba, Musturay
    Ozkan, Hasan
    Idilman, Ramazan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 33 (02) : 153 - 160
  • [42] Magnetic resonance elastography in evaluation of liver fibrosis in children with chronic liver disease
    Duygu Demirtaş
    Emre Ünal
    İlkay S. İdilman
    Zuhal Akçören
    Mehmet Akif Göktaş
    Meryem Seda Boyraz
    Sevilay Karahan
    Diclehan Orhan
    Mithat Haliloğlu
    Muşturay Karçaaltıncaba
    Hasan Özen
    Insights into Imaging, 14
  • [43] Prospective comparison of transient, point shear wave, and magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis
    Lefebvre, Thierry
    Wartelle-Bladou, Claire
    Wong, Philip
    Sebastiani, Giada
    Giard, Jeanne-Marie
    Castel, Helene
    Murphy-Lavallee, Jessica
    Olivie, Damien
    Ilinca, Andre
    Sylvestre, Marie-Pierre
    Gilbert, Guillaume
    Gao, Zu-Hua
    Nguyen, Bich N.
    Cloutier, Guy
    Tang, An
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (12) : 6477 - 6488
  • [44] Magnetic resonance elastography quantification of the solid-to-fluid transition of liver tissue due to decellularization
    Everwien, Hannah
    de Schellenberger, Angela Ariza
    Haep, Nils
    Tzschaetzsch, Heiko
    Pratschke, Johann
    Sauer, Igor M.
    Braun, Juergen
    Hillebrandt, Karl H.
    Sack, Ingolf
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2020, 104
  • [45] Ensemble Kalman inversion for magnetic resonance elastography
    Iglesias, Marco
    McGrath, Deirdre M.
    Tretyakov, M., V
    Francis, Susan T.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (23)
  • [46] Liver stiffness measurement by magnetic resonance elastography is not affected by hepatic steatosis
    Chen, Jie
    Allen, Alina M.
    Therneau, Terry M.
    Chen, Jun
    Li, Jiahui
    Hoodeshenas, Safa
    Chen, Jingbiao
    Lu, Xin
    Zhu, Zheng
    Venkatesh, Sudhakar K.
    Song, Bin
    Ehman, Richard L.
    Yin, Meng
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (02) : 950 - 958
  • [47] Magnetic resonance elastography with guided pressure waves
    Tardieu, Marion
    Salameh, Najat
    Souris, Line
    Rousseau, David
    Jourdain, Laurene
    Skeif, Hanadi
    Prevot, Francois
    de Rochefort, Ludovic
    Ducreux, Denis
    Louis, Bruno
    Garteiser, Philippe
    Sinkus, Ralph
    Darrasse, Luc
    Poirier-Quinot, Marie
    Maitre, Xavier
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2022, 35 (07)
  • [48] Magnetic resonance elastography of liver and spleen: Methods and applications
    Garteiser, Philippe
    Doblas, Sabrina
    Van Beers, Bernard E.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2018, 31 (10)
  • [49] Automated liver stiffness measurements with magnetic resonance elastography
    Dzyubak, Bogdan
    Glaser, Kevin
    Yin, Meng
    Talwalkar, Jayant
    Chen, Jun
    Manduca, Armando
    Ehman, Richard L.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 38 (02) : 371 - 379
  • [50] Viscoelasticity-Based Magnetic Resonance Elastography for the Assessment of Liver Fibrosis in Hepatitis C Patients after Liver Transplantation
    Kamphues, C.
    Klatt, D.
    Bova, R.
    Yahyazadeh, A.
    Bahra, M.
    Braun, J.
    Klauschen, F.
    Neuhaus, P.
    Sack, I.
    Asbach, P.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2012, 184 (11): : 1013 - 1019