In silico evaluation and optimisation of magnetic resonance elastography of the liver

被引:0
|
作者
McGrath, Deirdre M. [1 ,2 ]
Bradley, Christopher R. [1 ,2 ]
Francis, Susan T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Ctr, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Queens Med Ctr, NIHR Nottingham Biomed Res Ctr, Radiol Sci, Div Clin Neurosci, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
magnetic resonance elastography; simulation; finite element modelling; liver; fibrosis; cirrhosis; MR ELASTOGRAPHY; INVERSION ALGORITHMS; FIBROSIS; ACCURATE; BRAIN; ACQUISITION; MULTISCALE; PHANTOMS;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ac3263
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is widely adopted as a biomarker of liver fibrosis. However, in vivo MRE accuracy is difficult to assess. Approach. Finite element model (FEM) simulation was employed to evaluate liver MRE accuracy and inform methodological optimisation. MRE data was simulated in a 3D FEM of the human torso including the liver, and compared with spin-echo echo-planar imaging MRE acquisitions. The simulated MRE results were compared with the ground truth magnitude of the complex shear modulus ( divide G* divide ) for varying: (1) ground truth liver divide G* divide ; (2) simulated imaging resolution; (3) added noise; (4) data smoothing. Motion and strain-based signal-to-noise (SNR) metrics were evaluated on the simulated data as a means to select higher-quality voxels for preparation of acquired MRE summary statistics of divide G* divide . Main results. The simulated MRE accuracy for a given ground truth divide G* divide was found to be a function of imaging resolution, motion-SNR and smoothing. At typical imaging resolutions, it was found that due to under-sampling of the MRE wave-field, combined with motion-related noise, the reconstructed simulated divide G* divide could contain errors on the scale of the difference between liver fibrosis stages, e.g. 54% error for ground truth divide G* divide = 1 kPa. Optimum imaging resolutions were identified for given ground truth divide G* divide and motion-SNR levels. Significance. This study provides important knowledge on the accuracy and optimisation of liver MRE. For example, for motion-SNR <= 5, to distinguish between liver divide G* divide of 2 and 3 kPa (i.e. early-stage liver fibrosis) it was predicted that the optimum isotropic voxel size is 4-6 mm.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A bayesian method for accelerated magnetic resonance elastography of the liver
    Ebersole, Christopher
    Ahmad, Rizwan
    Rich, Adam V.
    Potter, Lee C.
    Dong, Huiming
    Kolipaka, Arunark
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2018, 80 (03) : 1178 - 1188
  • [22] The role of magnetic resonance elastography in the evaluation of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
    Idilman, Ilkay S.
    Karcaaltincaba, Musturay
    HEPATOLOGY FORUM, 2023, 4 (01): : 1 - 2
  • [23] Free-breathing radial magnetic resonance elastography of the liver in children at 3 T: a pilot study
    Kafali, Sevgi Gokce
    Armstrong, Tess
    Shih, Shu-Fu
    Kim, Grace J.
    Holtrop, Joseph L.
    Venick, Robert S.
    Ghahremani, Shahnaz
    Bolster, Bradley D., Jr.
    Hillenbrand, Claudia M.
    Calkins, Kara L.
    Wu, Holden H.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 52 (07) : 1314 - 1325
  • [24] Hepatic magnetic resonance elastography: can it be an alternative to invasive biopsy preceding living donor liver transplantation?
    Mohamed, Rania Essam-el-dein
    Amin, Mohamed A.
    Omar, Hazem M.
    Soliman, Hossam Eldeen M.
    Zakaria, Hazem
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 51 (01)
  • [25] Do regions of interest location and type influence liver stiffness measurement using magnetic resonance elastography?
    Cogneau, A.
    Cho, H.
    Lucidarme, O.
    Wagner, M.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2019, 100 (06) : 363 - 370
  • [26] Inflammation activity affects liver stiffness measurement by magnetic resonance elastography in MASLD
    Wei, Xiaodie
    Qi, Shi
    Wei, Xinhuan
    Qiu, Lixia
    Du, Xiaofei
    Liu, Yali
    Xu, Hangfei
    Zhao, Jinhan
    Chen, Sitong
    Zhang, Jing
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2024, 56 (10) : 1715 - 1720
  • [27] Use of magnetic resonance elastography for assessing liver functional reserve: A clinical study
    Li, Bin
    Min, Jie
    Liang, Wei-Ren
    Zhang, Guang-Qiang
    Wu, Jian-Jun
    Jin, Kai
    Huang, Wei
    Ying, Cai-Yu
    Chao, Ming
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (24) : 7522 - 7528
  • [28] Magnetic Resonance Elastography in the Liver at 3 Tesla Using a Second Harmonic Approach
    Herzka, D. A.
    Kotys, M. S.
    Sinkus, R.
    Pettigrew, R. I.
    Gharib, A. M.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2009, 62 (02) : 284 - 291
  • [29] Magnetic resonance elastography for the detection and staging of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B
    Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh
    Gang Wang
    Seng Gee Lim
    Aileen Wee
    European Radiology, 2014, 24 : 70 - 78
  • [30] Preoperative evaluation of liver regeneration following hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance elastography
    Zhang, Tong
    Li, Qian
    Wei, Yi
    Yao, Shan
    Yuan, Yuan
    Deng, Liping
    Wu, Dongbo
    Nie, Lisha
    Wei, Xiaocheng
    Tang, Hehan
    Song, Bin
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, : 5433 - 5451