In silico evaluation and optimisation of magnetic resonance elastography of the liver

被引:0
|
作者
McGrath, Deirdre M. [1 ,2 ]
Bradley, Christopher R. [1 ,2 ]
Francis, Susan T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Ctr, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Queens Med Ctr, NIHR Nottingham Biomed Res Ctr, Radiol Sci, Div Clin Neurosci, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
magnetic resonance elastography; simulation; finite element modelling; liver; fibrosis; cirrhosis; MR ELASTOGRAPHY; INVERSION ALGORITHMS; FIBROSIS; ACCURATE; BRAIN; ACQUISITION; MULTISCALE; PHANTOMS;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ac3263
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is widely adopted as a biomarker of liver fibrosis. However, in vivo MRE accuracy is difficult to assess. Approach. Finite element model (FEM) simulation was employed to evaluate liver MRE accuracy and inform methodological optimisation. MRE data was simulated in a 3D FEM of the human torso including the liver, and compared with spin-echo echo-planar imaging MRE acquisitions. The simulated MRE results were compared with the ground truth magnitude of the complex shear modulus ( divide G* divide ) for varying: (1) ground truth liver divide G* divide ; (2) simulated imaging resolution; (3) added noise; (4) data smoothing. Motion and strain-based signal-to-noise (SNR) metrics were evaluated on the simulated data as a means to select higher-quality voxels for preparation of acquired MRE summary statistics of divide G* divide . Main results. The simulated MRE accuracy for a given ground truth divide G* divide was found to be a function of imaging resolution, motion-SNR and smoothing. At typical imaging resolutions, it was found that due to under-sampling of the MRE wave-field, combined with motion-related noise, the reconstructed simulated divide G* divide could contain errors on the scale of the difference between liver fibrosis stages, e.g. 54% error for ground truth divide G* divide = 1 kPa. Optimum imaging resolutions were identified for given ground truth divide G* divide and motion-SNR levels. Significance. This study provides important knowledge on the accuracy and optimisation of liver MRE. For example, for motion-SNR <= 5, to distinguish between liver divide G* divide of 2 and 3 kPa (i.e. early-stage liver fibrosis) it was predicted that the optimum isotropic voxel size is 4-6 mm.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver: Clinical Applications
    Venkatesh, Sudhakar K.
    Yin, Meng
    Ehman, Richard L.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2013, 37 (06) : 887 - 896
  • [2] Simultaneous multislice rapid magnetic resonance elastography of the liver
    Majeed, Waqas
    Kalra, Prateek
    Kolipaka, Arunark
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2020, 33 (04)
  • [3] Magnetic Resonance Elastography for Staging Liver Fibrosis in the Oncopig
    Gaba, Ron C.
    Elkhadragy, Lobna
    Pennix, Thomas
    Schachtschneider, Kyle M.
    Bolt, Courtni R.
    Anderson, Aaron
    Majumdar, Shreyan
    Weber, Denise
    Whiteley, Herbert E.
    Regan, Daniel P.
    Schook, Lawrence B.
    Sutton, Bradley P.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (17)
  • [4] The role of magnetic resonance elastography in liver stiffness evaluation
    Mannelli, Lorenzo
    Monti, Serena
    Ogurtsov, Pavel
    POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE-POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ, 2019, 129 (05): : 301 - 302
  • [5] Viscoelastic properties of liver measured by oscillatory rheometry and multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography
    Klatt, Dieter
    Friedrich, Christian
    Korth, Yasmin
    Vogt, Robert
    Braun, Juergen
    Sack, Ingolf
    BIORHEOLOGY, 2010, 47 (02) : 133 - 141
  • [6] Magnetic resonance elastography for the detection and staging of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B
    Venkatesh, Sudhakar Kundapur
    Wang, Gang
    Lim, Seng Gee
    Wee, Aileen
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (01) : 70 - 78
  • [7] Repeatability of Magnetic Resonance Elastography for Quantification of Hepatic Stiffness
    Hines, Catherine D. G.
    Bley, Thorsten A.
    Lindstrom, Mary J.
    Reeder, Scott B.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 31 (03) : 725 - 731
  • [8] Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Brain: An In Silico Study to Determine the Influence of Cranial Anatomy
    McGrath, Deirdre M.
    Ravikumar, Nishant
    Wilkinson, Iain D.
    Frangi, Alejandro F.
    Taylor, Zeike A.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2016, 76 (02) : 645 - 662
  • [9] Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver
    Venkatesh, Sudhakar Kundapur
    Ehman, Richard L.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 22 (03) : 433 - +
  • [10] A Comparative Study of Three Systems for Liver Magnetic Resonance Elastography
    Wang, Runke
    Wang, Yikun
    Qiu, Suhao
    Ma, Shengyuan
    Yan, Fuhua
    Yang, Guang-Zhong
    Li, Ruokun
    Feng, Yuan
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024, 60 (06) : 2472 - 2484