The ecosystem approach to management in the Baltic Sea Region: Analyzing regional environmental governance from a spatial perspective

被引:10
作者
Kern, Kristine [1 ,2 ]
Soderstrom, Sara [3 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Res Soc & Space IRS, Flakenstr 29-31, D-15537 Erkner, Germany
[2] Abo Akad Univ, Fac Social Sci Business & Econ, Fanriksgatan 3, SF-20500 Turku, Finland
[3] Sodertorn Univ, Sch Nat Sci Technol & Environm Studies, Alfred Nobels Alle 7, S-14189 Huddinge, Sweden
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
INSTITUTIONAL INTERPLAY; ORGANIZING COORDINATION; EU; IMPLEMENTATION; CHALLENGES; FISHERIES; DIMENSION; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2018.09.023
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The ecosystem approach to management (EAM) is a policy principle and management tool of increasing importance in European environmental governance. In the Baltic Sea region (BSR), this approach has developed in line with a progressive environmental management agenda, reaching from hot spot solutions to new holistic agendas. This paper examines the spatial dimensions of the EAM in the Baltic Sea Region (BSR). The analysis is based on an analytical framework which combines regional environmental governance with debates on socio-spatial relations. It is found that the development, implementation, and spread of EAM corresponds with changing socio-spatial relations. Reterritorialisation of both institutional arrangements and policies is needed to solve cross-boundary problems. Place-making such as hot spots and pilot projects (e.g., in maritime spatial planning) are first steps towards the upscaling of local experiments and re-scaling of policies is also needed for the implementation of EAM in a macroregional multi-level setting, stretching from the EU to the local level. Analyzing regional environmental governance from a spatial perspective reveals institutional ambiguities and even institutional voids because the successful implementation of EAM requires new institutional arrangements.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 277
页数:7
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2000, P 5 M C PART CONV BI
  • [2] [Anonymous], J ENVL L
  • [3] Verifying environmental cleanup: lessons from the Baltic Sea Joint Comprehensive Environmental Action Programme
    Auer, MR
    Nilenders, E
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2001, 19 (06): : 881 - 901
  • [4] Bache I., 2004, MULTILEVEL GOVERNANC, P93
  • [5] Transboundary maritime spatial planning: a Baltic Sea perspective
    Backer, Hermanni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COASTAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 15 (02) : 279 - 289
  • [6] Balsiger J., 2010, The International Studies Encyclopedia, V9, P6179
  • [7] Balsiger J, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V12, P1
  • [8] Major challenges in regional environmental governance research and practice
    Balsiger, Joerg
    Debarbieux, Bernard
    [J]. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE: INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, THEORETICAL ISSUES, COMPARATIVE DESIGNS (REGOV), 2011, 14 : 1 - 8
  • [9] Boström M, 2016, MARE PUBL SER, V10, P149, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-27006-7_7
  • [10] Ecosystem management: what is it really?
    Brussard, PF
    Reed, JM
    Tracy, CR
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 1998, 40 (1-3) : 9 - 20