Installation of telerobotic surgery and initial experience with telerobotic radical prostatectomy

被引:39
作者
Costello, AJ
Haxhimolla, H
Crowe, H
Peters, JS
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Urol, Div Surg, Parkville, Vic 3050, Australia
[2] Epworth Med Fdn, Australian Inst Robot Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
telerobotic; radical prostatectomy; Da Vinci system; outcome;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05562.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the ability of untrained laparoscopic surgeons to learn and implement laparoscopic telerobotic radical prostatectomy (TRP) using the daVinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, CA), and assess the education, safety and efficacy issues when instituting this system. Patients and methods Between December 2003 and October 2004, 122 consecutive TRPs were performed by two surgeons for clinically localized prostate cancer. The individual robotic surgeon was assisted at the bedside by another surgeon. The TRP was performed robotically by the surgeon at the remote console unit. Perioperative data and pathological results were recorded. The two surgeons spent 1 week in a skills laboratory using a porcine model of laparoscopic TRP, and then cadaveric robotic prostatectomy. The first six cases were mentored by an experienced telerobotic surgeon. Results The TRP was conducted by two surgeons with no previous laparoscopic experience. There were no conversions to open surgery. Assessing the complications, postoperative continence, operating time and transfusion rates showed equivalent efficacy and safety to open and pure laparoscopic methods. Conclusion TRP represents a novel computer-based surgical approach to prostate cancer, which offers the benefits of minimally invasive surgery without the extensive experience associated with the laparoscopic method. It remains to be seen whether the robotic approach can deliver better outcomes in continence and potency over time.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 38
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: Initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Ahlering, TE
    Skarecky, D
    Lee, D
    Clayman, RV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (05) : 1738 - 1741
  • [2] Feasibility of robot-assisted totally intracorporeal laparoscopic ileal conduit urinary diversion: Initial results of a single institutional pilot study
    Balaji, KC
    Yohannes, P
    McBride, CL
    Oleynikov, D
    Hemstreet, GP
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2004, 63 (01) : 51 - 55
  • [3] Trans-oceanic telerobotic surgery
    Challacombe, BJ
    Kavoussi, LR
    Dasgupta, P
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 (07) : 678 - 680
  • [4] Recent advances in minimal access surgery
    Darzi, A
    Mackay, S
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7328): : 31 - 34
  • [5] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases at Montsouris Institute
    Guillonneau, B
    El-Fettouh, H
    Baumert, H
    Cathelineau, X
    Doublet, JD
    Fromont, G
    Vallancien, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04) : 1261 - 1266
  • [6] Guillonneau B, 2000, J UROLOGY, V163, P1643, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67512-X
  • [7] Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: What are the real advantages?
    Herrell, SD
    Smith, JA
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 95 (01) : 3 - 4
  • [8] Robotic surgery - A current perspective
    Lanfranco, AR
    Castellanos, AE
    Desai, JP
    Meyers, WC
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 239 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [9] Robotic radical prostatectomy and the Vattikuti Urology Institute technique: An interim analysis of results and technical points
    Menon, M
    Tewari, A
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (04) : 15 - 20
  • [10] Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: A comparative study at a single institution
    Rassweiler, J
    Seemann, O
    Schulze, M
    Teber, D
    Hatzinger, M
    Frede, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (05) : 1689 - 1693