Goff Septotomy Is a Safe and Effective Salvage Biliary Access Technique Following Failed Cannulation at ERCP

被引:3
作者
Barakat, Monique T. [1 ]
Girotra, Mohit [1 ]
Huang, Robert J. [1 ]
Choudhary, Abhishek [1 ]
Thosani, Nirav C. [1 ]
Kothari, Shivangi [1 ]
Sethi, Saurabh [1 ]
Banerjee, Subhas [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Sch Med, 300 Pasteur Dr,MC 5244, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Goff septotomy; Biliary cannulation; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Needle knife; Double wire; TRANSPANCREATIC PRECUT SPHINCTEROTOMY; COMMON BILE-DUCT; RECTAL INDOMETHACIN; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND; PANCREATITIS; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; DRAINAGE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s10620-020-06124-6
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Biliary cannulation is readily achieved in > 85% of patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). When standard cannulation techniques fail, salvage techniques utilized include the needle knife precut, double wire technique, and Goff septotomy. Methods Records of patients undergoing ERCP from 2005 to 2016 were retrospectively examined using a prospectively maintained endoscopy database. Patients requiring salvage techniques for biliary access were analyzed together with a control sample of 20 randomly selected index ERCPs per study year. Demographic and clinical variables including indications for ERCP, cannulation rates, and adverse events were collected. Results A total of 7984 patients underwent ERCP from 2005 to 2016. Biliary cannulation was successful in 94.9% of control index ERCPs, 87.2% of patients who underwent Goff septotomy (significantly higher than for all other salvage techniques, p <= 0.001), 74.5% of patients in the double wire group and 69.6% of patients in the needle knife precut group. Adverse event rates were similar in the Goff septotomy (4.1%) and index ERCP control sample (2.7%) groups. Adverse events were significantly higher in the needle knife group (27.2%) compared with all other groups. Conclusions This study represents the largest study to date of Goff septotomy as a salvage biliary access technique. It confirms the efficacy of Goff septotomy and indicates a safety profile similar to standard cannulation techniques and superior to the widely employed needle knife precut sphincterotomy. Our safety and efficacy data suggest that Goff septotomy should be considered as the primary salvage approach for failed cannulation, with needle knife sphincterotomy restricted to Goff septotomy failures.
引用
收藏
页码:866 / 872
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] A retrospective comparison of outcomes using three different precut needle knife techniques for biliary cannulation
    Abu-Ramda, EM
    Baron, TH
    Simmons, DT
    Petersen, BT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 39 (08) : 717 - 721
  • [2] Endoscopic transpancreatic for inaccessible obstructed papillary septotomy bile ducts: comparison with standard pre-cut papillotomy
    Catalano, MF
    Linder, JD
    Geenen, JE
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (04) : 557 - 561
  • [3] The utility of upfront double wire guided biliary cannulation following early unintentional pancreatic cannulation in patients undergoing ERCP
    Chandran S.
    Nikfarjam M.
    [J]. Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013, 32 (5) : 324 - 329
  • [4] Lower Provider Volume is Associated With Higher Failure Rates for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
    Cote, Gregory A.
    Imler, Timothy D.
    Xu, Huiping
    Teal, Evgenia
    French, Dustin D.
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    Rosenman, Marc B.
    Wilson, Jeffery
    Hui, Siu L.
    Sherman, Stuart
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2013, 51 (12) : 1040 - 1047
  • [5] ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY COMPLICATIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT - AN ATTEMPT AT CONSENSUS
    COTTON, PB
    LEHMAN, G
    VENNES, J
    GEENEN, JE
    RUSSELL, RCG
    MEYERS, WC
    LIGUORY, C
    NICKL, N
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (03) : 383 - 393
  • [6] ERCP (Ensuring Really Competent Practitioners): Action Please
    Cotton, Peter B.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 15 (12) : 1855 - 1857
  • [7] Cotton PB, 2017, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V86, P866, DOI [10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.1530, 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.008]
  • [8] Rectal indomethacin alone versus indomethacin and prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for preventing pancreatitis after ERCP: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Elmunzer, B. Joseph
    Serrano, Jose
    Chak, Amitabh
    Edmundowicz, Steven A.
    Papachristou, Georgios I.
    Scheiman, James M.
    Singh, Vikesh K.
    Varadurajulu, Shyam
    Vargo, John J.
    Willingham, Field F.
    Barons, Todd H.
    Cote, Gregory A.
    Romagnuolo, Joseph
    Wood-Williams, April
    Depue, Emily K.
    Spitzer, Rebecca L.
    Spino, Cathie
    Foster, Lydia D.
    Durkalski, Valerie
    [J]. TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [9] Does Rectal Indomethacin Eliminate the Need for Prophylactic Pancreatic Stent Placement in Patients Undergoing High-Risk ERCP? Post hoc Efficacy and Cost-Benefit Analyses Using Prospective Clinical Trial Data
    Elmunzer, B. Joseph
    Higgins, Peter D. R.
    Saini, Sameer D.
    Scheiman, James M.
    Parker, Robert A.
    Chak, Amitabh
    Romagnuolo, Joseph
    Mosler, Patrick
    Hayward, Rodney A.
    Elta, Grace H.
    Korsnes, Sheryl J.
    Schmidt, Suzette E.
    Sherman, Stuart
    Lehman, Glen A.
    Fogel, Evan L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 108 (03) : 410 - 415
  • [10] Guidelines for privileging, credentialing, and proctoring to perform GI endoscopy
    Faulx, Ashley L.
    Lightdale, Jenifer R.
    Acosta, Ruben D.
    Agrawal, Deepak
    Bruining, David H.
    Chandrasekhara, Vinay
    Eloubeidi, Mohamad A.
    Fanelli, Robert D.
    Gurudu, Suryakanth R.
    Kelsey, Loralee
    Khashab, Mouen A.
    Kothari, Shivangi
    Muthusamy, V. Raman
    Qumseya, Bashar J.
    Shaukat, Aasma
    Wang, Amy
    Wani, Sachin B.
    Yang, Julie
    DeWitt, John M.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (02) : 273 - 281