Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Spain: A Survey Regarding Its Practice, the Target Population, and Premedication Use

被引:23
作者
Fernandez, Cristina [1 ]
Boix, Hector [1 ]
Camba, Fatima [1 ]
Jose Comunas, Juan [1 ]
Castillo, Felix [1 ]
机构
[1] Vall dHebron Univ Hosp, Dept Neonatol, Passeig Vall dHebron 119-129, Barcelona 08035, Spain
关键词
preterm; respiratory distress syndrome; less invasive surfactant administration; surfactant; PRETERM INFANTS; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; PRESSURE; THERAPY; VENTILATION; RESPONSES; PROPOFOL; ATROPINE; AWAKE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0039-1678534
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective Scientific evidence supports the use of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) techniques, but certain issues may be limiting its generalized incorporation in clinical practice. The objectives were to determine the level of acceptance of LISA techniques in Spanish hospitals, the types of methods used, the target population, and the premedication administered. Study Design An online survey was designed and sent to various secondary/tertiary hospitals in Spain. Results Among 67 neonatal units contacted, 44 (65.7%) participated. LISA was used in 89%, and those that did not perform the technique were contemplating its use in the future. In total, 77% of hospitals used some type of pharmacologic sedation/analgesia before the procedure: 28% always and 49% sometimes. In all cases, the reason for premedication was concerned about pain and discomfort. The types of drugs and doses varied. Conclusion LISA has been incorporated in clinical practice of the hospitals surveyed, with a utilization rate higher than what has been reported to date. Sedation and analgesia are commonly administered. LISA is viewed as potentially involving some degree of pain and discomfort. Further studies are needed to determine the safest and most effective pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic measures to apply in these procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 280
页数:4
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Less invasive surfactant administration versus intubation for surfactant delivery in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Aldana-Aguirre, Jose C. ;
Pinto, Merlin ;
Featherstone, Robin M. ;
Kumar, Manoj .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2017, 102 (01) :F17-F23
[2]  
[Anonymous], BIOMED RES INT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Levels of Neonatal Care Pediatrics, V130, P587
[4]  
[Anonymous], AN PEDIAT BARC
[5]  
Attar Mohammad Ali, 2002, Semin Neonatol, V7, P353, DOI 10.1053/siny.2002.0129
[6]  
Borszewska-Kornacka Maria Katarzyna, 2015, Dev Period Med, V19, P271
[7]   Minimally-invasive surfactant therapy in preterm infants on continuous positive airway pressure [J].
Dargaville, Peter A. ;
Aiyappan, Ajit ;
De Paoli, Antonio G. ;
Kuschel, Carl A. ;
Kamlin, C. Omar F. ;
Carlin, John B. ;
Davis, Peter G. .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2013, 98 (02) :F122-F126
[8]   Sedation during Minimal Invasive Surfactant Therapy in Preterm Infants [J].
Dekker, Janneke ;
Lopriore, Enrico ;
Rijken, Monique ;
Rijntjes-Jacobs, Esther ;
Smits-Wintjens, Vivianne ;
te Pas, Arjan .
NEONATOLOGY, 2016, 109 (04) :308-313
[9]  
FRIESEN RH, 1987, ANESTH ANALG, V66, P874
[10]   Propofol compared with the morphine, atropine, and suxamethonium regimen as induction agents for neonatal endotracheal intubation: A randomized, controlled trial [J].
Ghanta, Satish ;
Abdel-Latif, Mohamed E. ;
Lui, Kei ;
Ravindranathan, Hari ;
Awad, John ;
Oei, Julee .
PEDIATRICS, 2007, 119 (06) :E1248-E1255